Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical evaluation of a yielding tunnel lining support system used in limiting large deformation in squeezing rock

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large deformation in squeezing soft rock is a significant challenge that complicates the safety of underground construction engineering. A yielding tunnel support system allows a certain amount of over-excavation, thereby accommodating large deformation in severely squeezing rock. In this study, a special yielding support system has been developed with a type of newly developed foamed concrete material which has a cushion effect. The special yielding support uses pre-cast foamed concrete blocks which are mounted in the primary lining, and an in situ cast foamed concrete layer which is placed between the primary lining and the secondary lining. The effect of the special yielding support on squeezing rock tunnels has been validated by comparing the numerical results with those of a lining-strengthened stiff support system. The incorporation of the foamed concrete blocks can both reduce the maximum and minimum principal stress in the primary lining. Relative to the stiff support, the maximum and minimum principal stress in the primary lining are about 50 and 60% of those of the stiff support, respectively, thereby improving the stress state of the primary lining. Further, compared with that in the stiff support, the plastic zone in the secondary lining in this yielding support is significantly improved, and the deformations at the roof and the sides of the secondary lining are 40 and 46% less than that of the stiff support, respectively, resulting in a better stress state and less deformation in the secondary lining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agan C (2016) Prediction of squeezing potential of rock masses around the Suruc Water tunnel. B Eng Geol Environ 75(2):451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy CO, Ogul K, Topal I, Ozer SC, Ozacar V, Posluk E (2012) Numerical modeling of non-deformable support in swelling and squeezing rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 52(6):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan O, Akagi T, Kawamoto T (1993) The squeezing potential of rocks around tunnels—theory and prediction. Rock Mech Rock Eng 26(2):137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barla G, Bonini M, Semeraro M (2011) Analysis of the behaviour of a yield-control support system in squeezing rock. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 26(1):146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantieni L, Anagnostou G (2009) The interaction between yielding supports and squeezing ground. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 24(3):309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Tian H, Yang F, Geng Y (2011) Study of effects of foam concrete preset deformation layer on long-term stability of deep soft rock tunnel. Rock Soil Mech 32(9):2577–2583

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgic S (2002) Tunneling in squeezing rock, the Bolu tunnel. Anatol Motorw Turkey Eng Geol 67(1–2):73–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi RD, Singh M, Viladkar MN, Goel RK (2013) Prediction of tunnel deformation in squeezing grounds. Eng Geol 161(7):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi RD, Singh M, Viladkar MN, Goel RK (2014) Estimation of support pressure during tunnelling through squeezing grounds. Eng Geol 168(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (2001) Big tunnels in bad rock. J Geotech Geoenviron 127(9):726–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolymbas D, Fellin W, Kirsch A (2006) Squeezing due to stress relaxation in foliated rock. Int J Numer Anal Met 30(13):1357–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng LB, Li TB, Jiang Y, Wang R, Li YR (2013) Characteristics and mechanisms of large deformation in the Zhegu mountain tunnel on the Sichuan-Tibet highway. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 37:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger F, Ramoni M, Anagnostou G, Dimitrakopoulos A, Meystre N (2017) Evaluation of higher capacity segmental lining systems when tunnelling in squeezing rock. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 65:200–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger F, Ramoni M, Anagnostou G (2018) Options for deformable segmental lining systems for tunnelling in squeezing rock. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 76:64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz B (2011) Yielding elements–requirements, overview and comparison. Geomech Tunn 4(3):221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngoc-Anh D, Dias D, Oreste P (2015) 3D numerical investigation on the interaction between mechanized twin tunnels in soft ground. Environ Earth Sci 73(5):2101–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scussel D, Chandra S (2014) New approach to the design of tunnels in squeezing ground. Int J Geomech 14(1):110–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian HM, Chen WZ, Yang DS, Wu GJ, Tan XJ (2016) Numerical analysis on the interaction of shotcrete liner with rock for yielding supports. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 54:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian HM, Chen WZ, Tan XJ, Yang DS, Wu GJ, Yu JX (2018) Numerical investigation of the influence of the yield stress of the yielding element on the behaviour of the shotcrete liner for yielding support. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 73:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrakas A, Anagnostou G (2016) Ground response to tunnel re-profiling under heavily squeezing conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(7):2753–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wang Y, Lu S (2000) Deformational behaviour of roadways in soft rocks in underground coal mines and principles for stability control. Int J Rock Mech Min 37(6):937–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Chen WZ, Tan XJ, Tian HM, Cao JJ (2012) Development of a new type of foam concrete and its application on stability analysis of large-span soft rock tunnel. J Cent South Univ 19(11):3305–3310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Chen W, Wang Q, Zheng P (2016) Rheological properties of surrounding rock in deep hard rock tunnels and its reasonable support form. J Cent South Univ 23(4):898–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu GJ, Chen WZ, Dai YH, Yang JP, Tan XJ, Tian HM (2017) Application of a type of strain block FBG sensor for strain measurements of squeezing rock in a deep-buried tunnel. Meas Sci Technol 28(11):115001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng KH, Xu JX (2013) Unified semi-analytical solution for elastic-plastic stress of deep circular hydraulic tunnel with support yielding. J Cent South Univ 20(6):1742–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao WS, Chen WZ, Tan XJ, Huang S (2013) Study on foamed concrete used as seismic isolation material for tunnels in rock. Mater Res Innov 17(7):465–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51379007), the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2018CFA012) and the support of the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guojun Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, G., Chen, W., Tian, H. et al. Numerical evaluation of a yielding tunnel lining support system used in limiting large deformation in squeezing rock. Environ Earth Sci 77, 439 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7614-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7614-0

Keywords

Navigation