Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a hydrodynamic threshold in the Zhaidi karst aquifer (Guangxi Province, China)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding how the discharge-rate and the hydraulic gradient of a karst aquifer varies in response to rainfall events is important for the efficient management of water resources in these aquifers. The relationship between discharge and hydraulic gradient is related to aquifer properties such as the physical characteristics of the karstic matrix, hydraulic conductivity and the extent to which water is exchanged between conduits and the matrix. In this study, discharge and hydraulic gradient data were monitored at 4-h intervals for 476 continuous days in the Zhaidi karst aquifer located in Guilin, Guangxi Province, China. These data showed that the relationship between flow rate and hydraulic gradient in the aquifer became increasing non-linear with increasing flow rates. After analyzing the time series data, a hydrodynamic threshold between quickflow- and baseflow conditions was found to take place at a discharge rate of 0.80 m3/s. The linear law and nonlinear equations were obtained between discharge and hydraulic gradient which reflected the flow mechanism of groundwater flow in this karst aquifer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelini P (1997) Correlation and spectral analysis of two hydrogeological systems in central Italy. Hydrol Sci J 42(3):425–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669709492038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson TC (1977) Diffuse flow and conduit flow in limetone terrain in the Mendip hills, Somerset (Great Britain). J Hydrol 35:93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O (1993) Karst springs hydrographs as indicators of karst aquifers[J]. Hydrol Sci J 38(1):51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy H (1856) Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon: exposition et application. Victor Dalmont, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewaide L, Bonniver I, Rochez G, Hallet V (2016) Solute transport in heterogeneous karst systems: dimensioning and estimation of the transport parameters via multi-sampling tracer-tests modelling using the OTIS (One-dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage) Program. J Hydrol 534:567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiFrenna VJ, Price RM, Savabi MR (2008) Identification of a hydrodynamic threshold in karst rocks from the Biscayne Aquifer, south Florida, USA[J]. Hydrogeol J 16(1):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F (2014) The recession of spring hydrographs, focused on karst aquifers. Water Resour Manage 28:1781–1805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F, Doglioni A (2010) The relation between karst spring discharge and rainfall by cross-correlation analysis (Campania, southern Italy). Hydrogeol J 18:1881–1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0666-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemizadeh R, Hellweger F, Butscher C, Padilla I, Vesper D, Field M, Alshawabkeh A (2012) Review: groundwater flow and transport modeling of karst aquifers, with particular reference to the North Coast Limestone aquifer system of Puerto Rico. Hydrogeol J 20(8):1441–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huihai. L, Birkholzer J (2012) On the relationship between water flow and hydraulic gradient for unsaturated and saturated clay. J Hydrol 475:242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs A, Perrochet P, Darabos E, Lenart L, Szucs P (2015) Well hydrograph analysis for the characterization of flow dynamics and conduit network geometry in a karst aquifer, Bukk Mountains, Hungary. J Hydrol 530:484–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauber U, Goldscheider N (2014) Use of artificial and natural tracers to access groundwater transit-time distribution and flow systems in a high-alpine karst system (Wetterstein Mountains, Germany). Hydrogeol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-014-1173-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lianxing Yi R, Xia J, Tang D, Lu Z, Wang H, Lu LZ (2014) Karst conduit hydro-gradient nonlinear variation feature study: case study of Zhaidi karst underground river. Environ Earth Sci 74(2):1071–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Lihong L, Xunhong C, Guangquan X, Longcang S (2011) Use of hydrologic time-series data for identification of hydrodynamic function and behavior in a karstic water system in China. Hydrogeol J 19:1577–1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0774-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik P, Vojtkova S (2012) Use of recession-curve analysis for estimation of karstification degree and its application in assessing overflow/underflow conditions in closely spaced karstic springs. Environ Earth Sci 65:2245–2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1596-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayaud C, Wagner T, Benischke R, Birk S (2014) Single event time series analysis in a binary karst catchment evaluated using a groundwater model (Lurbach system, Austria). J Hydrol 511:628–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassery HR, Alijani F, Nakhaei M (2013) The comparison of hydrodynamic characteristics of karst aquifers: application on two karst formations in Zagros (Asmari and Ilan-Sarvak), southwest Iran. Arab J Geosci 10:1007–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin J, Luetscher M (2008) Inference of the structure of karst conduits using quantitative tracer tests and geological information: example of the Swiss Jura. Hydrogeol J 16:951–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0281-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjith PG, Viete DR (2011) Applicability of the ‘cubic law’ for non-Darcian fracture flow. J Pet Sci Eng 78:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker WB, Kuniansky EL, Birk S, Bauer S, Swain ED (2008) Documentation of a conduit flow process (CFP) for MODFLOW-2005, Book 6, Chapter A24. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • White WB, White EL (2005) Ground water flow distribution between matrix, fractures, and conduits: constraints on modeling. Speleogenesis Evol Karst Aquifers 3(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington SRH, Soley RWN (2017) Identifying turbulent flow in carbonate aquifers. J Hydrol 552:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41502252), CGS Research Fund (no. JYYWF20180402) and China Geological Survey (no. DD20160300) for supporting this study. We also thank all anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangjie Zhao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (RAR 27924 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Yang, Y., Xia, R. et al. Evaluation of a hydrodynamic threshold in the Zhaidi karst aquifer (Guangxi Province, China). Environ Earth Sci 77, 424 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7599-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7599-8

Keywords

Navigation