Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Water circulation in karst systems: comparing physicochemical and environmental isotopic data interpretation

Environmental Earth Sciences volume 77, Article number: 421 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Many studies have used physicochemical response observed at karst springs during storm events to investigate the concept of diffuse flow in karst systems, but the complete description of the karst systems including the interactions of all components is not fully understood. Studies have shown that physicochemical response measured at karst springs can decrease or increase in response to storm events. It is clear from these studies that the use of only physicochemical response in interpreting water circulation in karst systems can be ambiguous. In this study, both physicochemical and isotope (stable and radiogenic) responses at City Spring, Cookeville, Tennessee, during snowmelt were used to interpret the hydrological cycle of a karst system. At the beginning of snow melting, all physicochemical parameters dropped, and thereafter, temperature, Ca, Mg, and HCO3 increased steadily with increased discharge and total dissolved solids. In contrast, generally Na, Cl, and SO4 remained constant after dropping; however, very high values were observed in the spring water mixed with stormwater runoff. δ2H, δ18O, and 87Sr/86Sr of spring water were stable and contrastingly different from the snow, rain, and spring water mixed with stormwater runoff samples. CO2 pressure was higher than atmospheric and appeared to be degassing. The data suggest that spring discharge is a mix of pre-event water stored in the soil, epikarst zone, and underlying bedrock. The circulation depth is unknown, but is likely controlled by the amount of storm event recharge that occurs through the piston effect. There is little evidence to support dilution by snowmelt. This study shows that combining the techniques and data can provide greater insight into water circulation and monitoring of karst aquifer systems than applying the techniques and data individually.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

References

  • Aquilina L, Ladouche B, Doerfliger N (2005) Recharge processes in karstic systems investigated through the correlation of chemical and isotopic composition of rain and spring-waters. Appl Geochem 20:2189–2206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson TC (1971) The dangers of pollution of limestone aquifers, with special reference to the Mendip Hills Somerset. Proceedings University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 12:281–290

  • Baena CL, Andreo B, Mudry J et al (2009) Groundwater temperature and electrical conductivity as tools to characterize flow patterns in carbonate aquifers: the Sierra de las Nieves Karst aquifer, southern Spain. J Hydrol 17:843–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Berner EK, Berner RA (2012) Global environment: Water, air and geochemical cycles. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Birk S, Liedl R, Sauter M (2004) Identification of localized recharge and conduit flow by combined analysis of hydraulic and physico-chemical spring responses. J Hydrol 286:179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brahana JV, Bradley MW (1986) Preliminary delineation and description of the regional aquifers of Tennessee: the Highland Rim aquifer system. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 82-4054, Nashville

  • Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Clark ID, Fritz P (1992) Investigating recharge of shallow and paleo-groundwaters in the Villa de Reyes Basin, SLP, Mexico, with environmental isotopes. Appl Hydrogeol 1(4):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark I, Fritz P (1997) Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. Lewis Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Collerson KD, Ullman WJ, Torgersen T (1988) Ground waters with unradiogenic 87Sr/86Sr ratios in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia. Geology 16:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell DW, Ford DC (1980) Hydrochemistry of a dolomite karst: the Bruce Peninsula of Ontario. Can J Earth Sci 17(4):520–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansgaard W (1964) Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus 16(4):36–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis GH, Lee CK, Bradley E et al (1970) Geohydrologic interpretations of a volcanic island from environmental isotopes. Water Resour Res 6:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher S, Stuber AM (1976) Strontium isotopes in selected streams within the Susquehanna River Basin. Water Resour Res 12:1061–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster SSD, Cripps AC, Smith-Carington A (1982) Nitrate leaching to groundwater. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 296:477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gat JR (1971) Comments on the stable isotope method in regional groundwater investigations. Water Resour Res 7:980–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann A, Goldscheider N, Wagener T et al (2014) Karst water resources in a changing world: review of hydrological modeling approaches. Rev Geophys 52:218–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess JW, White WB (1988) Storm response of the karstic carbonate aquifer of southcentral Kentucky. J Hydrol 99(3–4):235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess JW, White WB (1993) Groundwater geochemistry of the carbonate karst aquifer, Southcentral Kentucky. Appl Geochem. 8(2):189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand O, Nödler K, Geyer T et al (2014) Investigating the dynamics of two herbicides at a karst spring in Germany: consequences for sustainable raw water management. Sci Total Environ 482–483:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hounslow A (1995) Water quality data: analysis and interpretation. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y (2011) Strontium isotope geochemistry of groundwater affected by human activities in Nandong underground river system. China Appl Geochem 26:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson TM, Roback RC, McLing TL et al (2000) Groundwater “fast paths” in the Snake River Plain aquifer: radiogenic isotope ratios as natural groundwater tracers. Geology 28(10):871–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas T, Marty C, Magnusson J (2009) Estimating the snow water equivalent from snow depth measurements in the Swiss Alps. J Hydrol 378(1–2):161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz BG, Hornsby HD, Bohlke FJ et al (1999) Sources and chronology of nitrate contamination in spring waters, Suwannee river basin. Florida 99-4252:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall C, Caldwell EA (1998) Fundamentals of isotope geochemistry. In: Kendall C, McDonnell J, Jeffrey (eds) Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 51–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Groves C, Meiman J (2004) South China karst aquifer storm-scale hydrochemistry. Ground Water 42:491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Chicano M, Bouamama M, Vallejos A et al (2001) Factors which determine the hydrogeochemical behaviour of karstic springs. A case study from the Betic Cordilleras, Spain. Appl Geochem 16(9–10):1179–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JB, Dean RW (2001) Exchange of water between conduits and matrix in the Floridan aquifer. Chem Geol 179:145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel F, Hering JG (1993) Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EW, Davis RK, Brahana JV et al (2002) Movement of nitrate through regolith covered karst terrane, northwest Arkansas. J Hydrol 256(1–2):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pride TE, Ogden AE, Harvey MJ et al (1988) The effects of urban development on spring water quality in Cookeville, Tennessee karst terranes and their solutions (November 16–18,1988, Maxwell House Hotel, Nashville, Tennessee). Proceedings of the second conference on environmental problems NGWA

  • Pu J, Cao M, Zhang Y et al (2014) Hydrochemical indications of human impact on karst groundwater in a subtropical karst area, Chongqing, China. Environ Earth Sci 72(5):1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; https://www.gbif.org/tool/81287/r-a-language-and-environment-for-statistical-computing

  • Reisch CE, Laura T (2014) Characterizing snowmelt anomalies in hydrochemographs of a karst spring, Cumberland Valley, Pennsylvania (USA): evidence for multiple recharge pathways. Environ Earth Sci 72(1):47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M, Meiman J (1996) An examination of short-term variations in water quality at a karst spring in Kentucky. Ground Water 34(1):23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Thrailkill J (1987) Chemical similarities among physically distinct spring types in a karst terrain. J Hydrol 89:259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster ET, White WB (1971) Seasonal fluctuations in the chemistry of lime-stone springs: a possible means for characterizing carbonate aquifers. J Hydrol 14:93–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel ID, Stoner D, Byrnes T et al (1990) A geochemical process approach to identify inorganic and organic ground-water contamination. Ground Water Management Number 2, Fourth National Outdoor Action Conference on Aquifer Restoration, Groundwater Monitoring and Geophysical Methods, Las Vegas, Nevada. NGWA:1291–1301

  • Ternan JL (1972) Comments on the use of a calcium hardness variability index in the study of carbonate aquifers: with reference to the Central Pennines, England. J Hydrol 16(4):317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toran L, Herman EK, White WB (2007) Comparison of flowpaths to a well and spring in a Karst aquifer. Ground Water 45(3):281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth J (1999) Groundwater as a geologic agent: an overview of the causes, processes, and manifestations. J Hydrol 7(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Tóth J (2009) Gravitational systems of groundwater flow: theory, evaluation, utilization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte ER (2001) The visual display of quantitative information, 2nd edn. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Conn, Cheshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandike JE (1982) The effects of the November 1981 liquid-fertilizer pipeline break on groundwater in Phelps County, Missouri Water Resources Report 75:1–26. Water Resources Data and Research Missouri Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Land Survey Rolla, Missouri 65401

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervier P (1990) Hydrochemical characterization of the water dynamics of a karstic system. J Hydrol 121(1–4):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesper DJ, White WB (2004) Storm pulse chemographs of saturation index and carbon dioxide pressure: implications for shifting recharge sources during storm events in the karst aquifer at Fort Campbell, Kentucky/Tennessee, USA. Hydrogeol J 12:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesper DJ, Loop CM, White WB (2003) Contaminant transport in karst aquifers. Speleogenesis Evolut Karst Aquifers 1(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • White WB (2002) Karst hydrology: recent developments and open questions 65:85–105

  • Worthington SRH, Davies GJ, Quinlan JF (1992) Geochemistry of springs in temperate carbonate aquifers: recharge type explains most of the variation. In: Chauve P, Zwahlen F (eds) 5meme colloque en pays calcaire. Neuchatel pp 341–346

  • Worthington SRH, Smart CC, Ruland W (2001) Karst hydrogeological investigations at Walkerton. http://www.worthingtongroundwater.com/Walkerton%20Exhibit%20416%20text.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The laboratory analysis and field measurement equipment for this research were funded by the Center for Management, Utilization, and Protection of Water Resources and the Art and Sciences faculty at Tennessee Tech University in Cookeville, Tennessee, and we are very grateful for their support. In particular, we sincerely thank the staff of the Center for Management, Utilization, and Protection of Water Resources Mr. Daniel Dodson, the late Mr. Michael Kuley, and Mr. Phillip Burr for their technical analytical support. In addition, we would like to thank the graduate and undergraduate students at the Earth Sciences Department, Tennessee Tech University for assisting Dr. Asante in the field. The conceptual model of karst system was drawn by John Brackins, a Ph.D. student in Civil Engineering Tennessee Tech University, who currently is in Dr. Asante’s Hydrogeology class. We give him many thanks. We are indebted to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions, which undoubtedly have helped in improving this research paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, Tennessee Technological University, 1 William L Jones Dr, Cookeville, TN, USA

    Joseph Asante, Sam Dotson & Evan Hart

  2. Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505, Maryland, NV, USA

    David K. Kreamer

Authors
  1. Joseph Asante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sam Dotson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evan Hart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David K. Kreamer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Asante.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asante, J., Dotson, S., Hart, E. et al. Water circulation in karst systems: comparing physicochemical and environmental isotopic data interpretation. Environ Earth Sci 77, 421 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7596-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7596-y

Keywords

  • Karst systems
  • Groundwater
  • Strontium isotope
  • Stable isotope
  • Hydrochemical data
  • Physicochemical data

Search

Navigation