Advertisement

Soil moisture response to white ash mortality following emerald ash borer invasion

  • Wendy M. RobertsonEmail author
  • Molly Robinett
  • Deborah G. McCullough
Original Article

Abstract

Emerald ash borer (EAB) (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire), an invasive forest insect first identified in southeastern Michigan in 2002, is established in at least 32 US states and three Canadian provinces. Ash (Fraxinus spp.) mortality rates in some forested areas exceed 90%, but to date, little is known about the potential effects of EAB-caused ash mortality on hydrological processes. More broadly, there is a need for information on the timing and magnitude of soil moisture response to species-specific mortality of overstory vegetation in deciduous forest systems. Soil moisture was examined in 28 forested sites where 0–100% of the white ash basal area (Fraxinus americana L.) was killed by EAB. Synoptic measurements of near-surface (0–6 cm depth) soil moisture were collected from 112 plots (18 m radius) within the sites. Three plots were also instrumented with soil moisture sensors at 10 and 25 cm depth to log hourly measurements from May to October. Synoptic data showing white ash mortality and soil moisture were positively correlated in the 34 plots with ≥ 5% mortality (by total basal area). In the intensively monitored plots, volumetric soil moisture declined from 37 to 16% between July and September where white ash mortality was low (0.6% of basal area killed), but remained near field capacity (~ 30%) throughout the monitoring period in the high mortality plot (8.6% of basal area killed), meriting further investigation to assess effects of white ash mortality on evapotranspiration and soil moisture dynamics in heterogeneous upland forests. Altered soil moisture may have implications for regrowth dynamics, infiltration/runoff partitioning, and nutrient cycling, but additional study to quantify the extent and duration of EAB-related ash mortality on hydrology at the plot and watershed scale is necessary.

Keywords

Soil moisture Disturbance hydrology Emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis Invasive species White ash Fraxinus americana 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Brian Martell and Alyssa Wethington, both of Michigan State University (MSU), and Jasmine Stefansky, Mike Wessenberg, John Goodin (Central Michigan University), and Jason Barnes for their assistance in the field. We appreciate the access to study sites provided by the Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, the Huron-Metro Park Association, and Eaton County. This work was funded by Grants to DGM from the USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry.

References

  1. Anulewicz AC, McCullough DG, Cappaert DL (2007) Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis) density and canopy dieback in three North American ash species. Arboric Urban For 33:338–349Google Scholar
  2. Anulewicz AC, McCullough DG, Cappaert DL, Poland TM (2008) Host range of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in North America: results of multiple-choice field experiments. Environ Entomol 37:230–241 (doi:10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[230:HROTEA]2.0.CO;2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple BA, Reeves HW (2007) Summary of hydrogeologic conditions by County for the State of Michigan (USGS Open-File Report No. 2007–1236)Google Scholar
  4. Biederman JA, Brooks PD, Harpold AA et al (2014a) Multiscale observations of snow accumulation and peak snowpack following widespread, insect-induced lodgepole pine mortality. Ecohydrol 7:150–162.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biederman JA, Harpold AA, Gochis DJ et al (2014b) Increased evaporation following widespread tree mortality limits streamflow response. Water Resour Res 50:5395–5409.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biederman JA, Somor AJ, Harpold AA et al (2015) Recent tree die-off has little effect on streamflow in contrast to expected increases from historical studies. Water Resour Res 51:9775–9789.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosch JM, Hewlett JD (1982) A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 55:3–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burr SJ, McCullough DG (2014) Condition of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) overstory and regeneration at three stages of the emerald ash borer invasion wave. Can J For Res 44:768–776.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cappaert D, McCullough DG, Poland TM, Siegert NW (2005) Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. Am Entomol 51:152–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clapp RB, Hornberger GM (1978) Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resour Res 14:601–604.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i004p00601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clow DW, Rhoades C, Briggs J et al (2011) Responses of soil and water chemistry to mountain pine beetle induced tree mortality in Grand County, Colorado, USA. Appl Geochem 26(Supplement):S174–S178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. COSEWIC (2014) COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Blue Ash Fraxinus quadrangulata in Canada - Species at Risk Public Registry. http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/document/default_e.cfm?documentID=2766. Accessed Aug 2017
  13. Decagon 5TM User’s Manual. [n.d.] Available at http://www.decagon.eu/education/5tm-manual/. Accessed Jan 2015
  14. Dunne T, Leopold LB (1978) Water in environmental planning. Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  15. EAB.info [Emerald Ash Borer Information] [n.d.]. http://www.emeraldashborer.info. Accessed Aug 2017
  16. Ebel BA, Mirus BB (2014) Disturbance hydrology: challenges and opportunities: invited commentary. Hydrol Process 28:5140–5148.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrand WR, Bell DL (1982) Quaternary geology of Michigan (map). Michigan Department of Natural Resources-Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  18. Fissore C, McFadden JP, Nelson KC et al (2012) Potential impacts of emerald ash borer invasion on biogeochemical and water cycling in residential landscapes across a metropolitan region. Urban Ecosyst 15:1015–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0239-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flower CE, Knight KS, Gonzalez-Meler MA (2012) Impacts of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) induced ash (Fraxinus spp.) mortality on forest carbon cycling and successional dynamics in the eastern United States. Biol Invasions 15:931–944.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0341-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flower CE, Knight KS, Rebbeck J, Gonzalez-Meler MA (2013) The relationship between the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) and ash (Fraxinus spp.) tree decline: using visual canopy condition assessments and leaf isotope measurements to assess pest damage. For Ecol Manag 303:143–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gandhi KJK, Herms DA (2010) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Invasions 12:389–405.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9627-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gesch DB, Oimoen M, Greenlee S, Nelson C, Steuck M, Tyler D (2002) The national elevation dataset. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:1Google Scholar
  23. Groundwater Inventory and Mapping Project (GWMAP) & Well View [n.d.]. http://gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu/. Accessed Jan 2016
  24. Herms DA, McCullough DG (2014) Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: History, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annu Rev Entomol 59:13–30.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillel D (1980) Fundamentals of soil physics. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Klooster WS, Herms DA, Knight KS et al (2014) Ash (Fraxinus spp.) mortality, regeneration, and seed bank dynamics in mixed hardwood forests following invasion by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Biol Invasions 16:859–873.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0543-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knight KS, Brown JP, Long RP (2013) Factors affecting the survival of ash (Fraxinus spp.) trees infested by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Biol Invasions 15:371–383.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0292-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kovacs KF, Mercader RJ, Haight RG et al (2011) The influence of satellite populations of emerald ash borer on projected economic costs in US communities, 2010–2020. J Environ Manag 92:2170–2181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Livneh B, Deems JS, Buma B et al (2015) Catchment response to bark beetle outbreak and dust-on-snow in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. J Hydrol 523:196–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loheide IISP. (2008) A method for estimating subdaily evapotranspiration of shallow groundwater using diurnal water table fluctuations. Ecohydrol 1:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCullough DG, Mercader RJ (2012) Evaluation of potential strategies to SLow Ash Mortality (SLAM) caused by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis): SLAM in an urban forest. Int J Pest Manag 58:9–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2011.637138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCullough DG, Mercader RJ, Siegert NW (2015) Developing and integrating tactics to slow ash (Oleaceae) mortality caused by emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Can Entomol 147:349–358.  https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2015.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mercader RJ, Siegert NW, Liebhold AM, McCullough DG (2011a) Simulating the effectiveness of three potential management options to slow the spread of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) populations in localized outlier sites. Can J For Res 41:254–264.  https://doi.org/10.1139/X10-201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mercader RJ, Siegert NW, Liebhold AM, McCullough DG (2011b) Influence of foraging behavior and host spatial distribution on the localized spread of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. Popul Ecol 53:271–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-010-0233-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mercader RJ, Siegert NW, McCullough DG (2012) Estimating the influence of population density and dispersal behavior on the ability to detect and monitor agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) populations. J Econ Entomol 105(1):272–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Millar DJ, Ewers BE, Mackay DS, Peckham S, Reed DE, Sekoni A (2017) Improving ecosystem-scale modeling of evapotranspiration using ecological mechanisms that account for compensatory responses following disturbance. Water Resour Res 53 (9):7853–7868.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mikkelson KM, Bearup LA, Maxwell RM et al (2013) Bark beetle infestation impacts on nutrient cycling, water quality and interdependent hydrological effects. Biogeochemistry 115:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9875-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nachabe M, Shah N, Ross M, Vomacka J (2005) Evapotranspiration of two vegetation covers in a shallow water table environment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:492–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NOAA National Weather Service. http://www.weather.gov/. Accessed 1 Sep 2016
  40. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Sys Sci 11(5):1633–1644.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Penn CA, Bearup LA, Maxwell RM, Clow DW (2016) Numerical experiments to explain multiscale hydrological responses to mountain pine beetle tree mortality in a headwater watershed. Water Resour Res 52(4):3143–3161.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J For 2006:118–124Google Scholar
  43. Pugh E, Gordon E (2013) A conceptual model of water yield effects from beetle-induced tree death in snow-dominated lodgepole pine forests. Hydrol Process 27:2048–2060.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pugh SA, Liebhold AM, Morin RS (2011) Changes in ash tree demography associated with emerald ash borer invasion, indicated by regional forest inventory data from the Great Lakes States. Can J For Res 41:2165–2175.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raymond P, Munson AD, Ruel J-C, Coates KD (2006) Spatial patterns of soil microclimate, light, regeneration, and growth within silvicultural gaps of mixed tolerant hardwood—white pine stands. Can J For Res 36:639–651.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rebek EJ, Herms DA, Smitley DR (2008) Interspecific variation in resistance to emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) among North American and Asian ash (Fraxinus spp.). Environ Entomol 37:242–246 (doi:10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[242:IVIRTE]2.0.CO;2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ritter E, Dalsgaard L, Einhorn KS (2005) Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manage 206:15–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ (2006) Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(5):1569–1578.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scharenbroch BC, Bockheim JG (2007) Impacts of forest gaps on soil properties and processes in old growth northern hardwood-hemlock forests. Plant Soil 294:219–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9248-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schlesinger RC (1990) Fraxinus americana L. White ash. Silvics of North America, Volume 2, Hardwoods. USDA Forest Service, Sidney pp 333–338Google Scholar
  51. Siegert NW, McCullough DG, Williams DW, Fraser I, Poland TM, Pierce SJ (2010) Dispersal of (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) From discrete epicenters in two outlier sites. Environ Entomol 39(2):253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siegert NW, McCullough DG, Liebhold AM, Telewski FW (2014) Dendrochronological reconstruction of the epicentre and early spread of emerald ash borer in North America. Divers Distrib 20:847–858.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slesak RA, Lenhart CF, Brooks KN et al (2014) Water table response to harvesting and simulated emerald ash borer mortality in black ash wetlands in Minnesota, USA. Can J For Res 44:961–968.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith A, Herms DA, Long RP, Gandhi KJK (2015) Community composition and structure had no effect on forest susceptibility to invasion by the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Can Entomol 147:318–328.  https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2015.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Soil Survey Staff Web Soil Survey. US Department of Agriculture, Washington. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm
  56. Stednick JD (1996a) Monitoring the effects of timber harvest on annual water yield. J Hydrol 176:79–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02780-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tanis SR, McCullough DG (2012) Differential persistence of blue ash and white ash following emerald ash borer invasion. Canadian J Forest Res 42(8):1542–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tanis SR, Mccullough DG (2015) Host Resistance of five Fraxinus species to Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and effects of paclobutrazol and fertilization. Environ Entomol 44(2):287–299.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvu005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Telander AC, Slesak RA, D’Amato AW et al (2015) Sap flow of black ash in wetland forests of northern Minnesota, USA: hydrologic implications of tree mortality due to emerald ash borer. Agric For Meteorol 206:4–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Villari C, Herms DA, Whitehill JGA et al (2016) Progress and gaps in understanding mechanisms of ash tree resistance to emerald ash borer, a model for wood-boring insects that kill angiosperms. New Phytol 209:63–79.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wagner DL, Todd KJ (2016) New ecological assessment for the emerald ash borer: a cautionary tale about unvetted host-plant literature. Am Entomol 62:26–35.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/tmw005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zarnoch SJ, Bechtold WA, Stolte KW (2004) Using crown condition variables as indicators of forest health. Can J For Res 34:1057–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesCentral Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA
  2. 2.Department of ForestryMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations