Advertisement

Porosity and wave velocity evolution of granite after high-temperature treatment: a review

  • Weqiang ZhangEmail author
  • Qiang Sun
  • Yuliang Zhang
  • Lei Xue
  • Fanfan Kong
Original Article

Abstract

The evolution of porosity and changes in wave velocity in granite after high-temperature treatment has been experimentally investigated in different studies. Statistical analysis of the test results shows that there is a temperature threshold value that leads to variations in porosity and wave velocity. At a temperature that is less than 200 °C, the porosity of granite slowly increases with increases in temperature, while the wave velocity decreases. When the temperature is greater than 200 °C (especially between 400 and 600 °C), the porosity quickly increases, while the wave velocity substantially decreases. The temperature ranges of room temperature to 200 and 200–400 °C correspond to the undamaged state and the micro-damage state, respectively. The results confirm that there is an important link between the variations of physical and mechanical properties in response to thermal treatment. By studying the relationships among rock porosity, wave velocity and temperature, this provides the basis for solving multi-variable coupling problems under high temperatures for the thermal exploitation of petroleum and safe disposal of nuclear waste.

Keywords

Thermal damage Porosity Wave velocity Micro-mechanism Damage coefficient Critical threshold 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (no. 41672279), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2011QNA04), State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, CAS) (no. 173114), General Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2017M621872) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

References

  1. Blake W (1982) Microseismic applications for mining—a practical guide. Bureau of Mines report, US Department of the Interior, pp 52–83Google Scholar
  2. Chaki S, Takarli M, Agbodjan WP (2008) Influence of thermal damage on physical properties of a granite rock: porosity, permeability and ultrasonic wave evolutions. Constr Build Mater 22:1456–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Y, Wang CY (1980) Thermally induced acoustic emission in Westerly granite. Geophys Res Lett 7(12):1089–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen YL, Ni J, Shao W, Azzam R (2012) Experimental study on the influence of temperature on the mechanical properties of granite under un-axial compression and fatigue loading. Int J Rock Mech Min 56:62–66Google Scholar
  5. Correa CR, Kruse A (2018) Supercritical water gasification of biomass for hydrogen production—review. J Supercrit Fluids 133(2):573–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darot M, Reuschle T (2000) Acoustic wave velocity and permeability evolution during pressure cycles on a thermally cracked granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37(7):1019–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dutton SP, Loucks RG (2010) Diagenetic controls on evolution of porosity and permeability in lower Tertiary Wilcox sandstones from shallow to ultradeep (200–6700 m) burial, Gulf of Mexica Basin, USA. Mar Pet Geol 27:1775–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dwivedi RD, Goel PK, Prasad VVR, Amalendu S (2008) Thermo-mechanical properties of Indian and other granites. Int J Rock Mech Min 45:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Etienne FH, Poupert R (1989) Thermally induced microcracking in granites: characterization and analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 26(2):125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao HM (2004) Study on law of rock permeability under high-temperature (in Chinese). Fuxin: Doctor. Thesis, Liaoning Technical UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. Geerits TW, Kelder O (1998) Acoustic waves propagation through porous media: theory and experiments. Oceanogr Lit Rev 45(3):476–479Google Scholar
  12. Hajpál M (2002) Changes in sandstone of historical monuments exposed to fire or high temperature. Fire Technol 38(4):373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hovem JM (1996) Acoustic waves in finely layered media. Int J Rock Mech Sci Geomech Abstr 33(5):210–212Google Scholar
  14. Inserra C, Biwa S, Chen YQ (2013) Influence of thermal damage on linear and nonlinear acoustic properties of granite. Int J Rock Mech Min 62:96–104Google Scholar
  15. Jana J, Agnes K (2012) Thermally induced alterations of minerals during measurements of the the temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility: a case study from the hydrothermally altered soultz-sous-Forêts granite, France. Int J Earth Sci 101:819–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones C, Keaney G, Meredith PG et al (1997) Acoustic emission and fluid permeability measurements on thermally cracked rock. Phys Chem Earth 22:813–817Google Scholar
  17. Kou SQ (1987) Effect of thermal cracking damage on the deformation and failure of granite (in Chinese). Acta Mech Sin 19(6):550–557Google Scholar
  18. Lokajícek T, Rudajev V, Dwivedi RD et al (2012) Influence of thermal heating on elastic wave velocities in granulite. Int J Rock Mech Min 54:1–8Google Scholar
  19. Nasseri MHB, Schubnel A, Young RP (2007) Coupled evolutions of fracture toughness and elastic wave velocities at high crack density in thermally treated westerly granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:601–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nasseri MHB, Tatone BSA, Grasselli G, Young RP (2009) Fracture toughness and fracture roughness interrelationship in thermally treated Westerly granite. Pure Appl Geophys 166:801–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roddy DJ, Younger PL (2010) Underground coal gasification with CCS: a pathway to decarbonising industry. Energy Environ Sci 3:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rutqvist J, Wu YS, Tsang CF, Bodvarsson G (2002) A modeling approach for analysis of coupled multiphase fluid flow, heat transfer, and deformation in fractured porous rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seipold U (1998) Temperature dependence of thermal transport properties of crystalline rocks—a general law. Tectonphysics 291:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Somerton WH (1992) Thermal properties and temperature-related behavior of rock/fluid systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 22 (29,187) Google Scholar
  25. Somerton WH, Boozer GD (1961) A method of measuring thermal diffusivities of rocks at elevatedt emperatures. AIChE J 7(1):87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Somerton WH, Selim MA (1961) Additional thermal data for porous rocks-thermal expansion and heat of reaction. Soc Petrol Eng J 1(4):249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun Q, Zhu SY (2014) Wave velocity and stress–strain in rock brittle failure. Environ Earth Sci 72(3):861–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun Q, Zhang ZZ, Xue L, Zhu SY (2013) Physical–mechanical properties variation of rock with phase transformation under high temperature (in Chinese). Chin J Rock Mech Eng 32(5):935–942Google Scholar
  29. Sun Q, Zhang WQ, Xue L (2015) Thermal damage pattern and thresholds of granite. Environ Earth Sci 74(3):2341–2349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sundberg J, Back PE, Christiansson R, Hökmark M, Ländell M, Wrafter J (2009) Modelling of thermal rock mass properties at the potential sites of a Swedish nuclear waste repository. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1042–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tian H, Kempka T, Xu NX, Ziegler M (2012) Physical properties of sandstones after high temperature treament. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:1113–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang ZL, Shi GY (2017) Effect of heat treatment on dynamic tensile strength and damage behavior of medium-fine-grained Huashan granite. Exp Tech 41(4):365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xi DY (1999) Physical characteristics of mineral phase transition in the granite (in Chinese). Acta Mineral Sin 14(3):223–227Google Scholar
  34. Yin TB (2012) Study on dynamic behavior of rocks considering thermal effect (in Chinese). Changsha: Ph.D. Thesis, Central South UniversityGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhan F, Cai M (2007) Influence of high temperature on anchoring system of cable bolts at stope hangingwall (in Chinese). J Liaoning Tech Univ 26:524–526Google Scholar
  36. Zhang RH, Zhang XT, Hu SM et al (2007) Kinetic experiments of water rock interactions at high temperatures and high pressures corresponding to the middle crust conditions (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin 23(11):223–227Google Scholar
  37. Zhao YS (2000) Rock mechanics problems in geothermal exploitation of hot dry rocks. In: The 6th academy conference of Chinese rock mechanics and engineering (in Chinese). Wuhan Science and Technology Press, pp 361–364Google Scholar
  38. Zhu HH, Yan ZG, Deng T et al (2006) Testing study on mechanical properties of tuff, granite and breccia after high temperatures (in Chinese). Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25(10):1945–1950Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weqiang Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qiang Sun
    • 1
  • Yuliang Zhang
    • 1
  • Lei Xue
    • 2
  • Fanfan Kong
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Resources and GeosciencesChina University of Mining and TechnologyXuzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Engineering Geomechanics, Institute of Geology and GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and PalaeontologyChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations