Appropriate aspirations for effective post-mining restoration and rehabilitation: a response to Kaźmierczak et al.
Confusion surrounding the definition and application of terminology in post-mining ecological repair has resulted in uncertainty for industry, the scientific community and regulators. This lack of clarity may underrepresent high aspirations or could be misused to disguise low aspirations and so is problematic for setting objectives, establishing goals and assessing recovery trajectories. We respond to a recently published analysis of the ecosystem repair literature, where we highlight inconsistencies stemming from inadequate reference to a large proportion of the restoration and rehabilitation literature. We outline increasingly well-accepted and internationally applied definitions concerning the restoration and recovery process and invite both the mining industry and policy-makers to re-examine their terminology in the interests of attaining an internationally agreed nomenclature. Clarity in the use and understanding of terminology will align post-mining targets with community expectation, enhance the capacity of the mining industry to understand and meet these targets, and foster better analysis and more industry-relevant discussion of recovery methodologies by the scientific community and practitioners.
KeywordsEcological restoration Ecosystem recovery Ecosystem repair Post-mining Reclamation Rehabilitation Revitalisation
This research was supported by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Mine Site Restoration (Project Number ICI150100041). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Australian Government or Australian Research Council. KP was partly supported by GACR 17-09979S. We thank two anonymous reviewers and Neva Goodwin for their constructive comments on the manuscript.
- Allen EB (ed) (1988) The reconstruction of disturbed arid lands: an ecological approach. American Association for the Advancement of Science, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Bradshaw AD, Chadwick MJ (1980) The restoration of land: the ecology and reclamation of derelict and degraded land. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Bustamante MMC, Roitman I, Aide TM, Alencar A, Anderson LO, Aragão L, Asner GP, Barlow J, Berenguer E, Chambers J, Costa MH, Fanin T, Ferreira LG, Ferreira J, Kelle M, Magnusson WE, Morales-Barquero L, Morton D, Ometto JPHB, Palace M, Peres CA, Silvério D, Trumbore S, Vieira ICG (2016) Toward an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity. Glob Change Biol 22:92–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Catterall CP, Kanowski J, Wardell-Johnson G, Proctor H, Reis T (2004) Quantifying the biodiversity values of reforestation: design issues and outcomes in Australian forest landscapes. Conservation of Australia’s forest fauna. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 359–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CBD (United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity) (2016) Ecosystem restoration: short-term actionplan. CBD/COP/DEC/XIII/5, 10 December 2016Google Scholar
- EPA (2009a) Karara iron ore project. Report and recommendations of the environmental protection authority, report 1321. Government of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
- EPA (2009b) Koolanooka/blue hills direct shipping ore mining project shires of Morawa and Perenjori. Report of the environmental protection authority, report 1328. Government of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
- Grigg A, Shelton M, Mullen B (2000) The nature and management of rehabilitated pastures on open-cut coal mines in central Queensland. Trop Grasslands 34:242–250Google Scholar
- Higgs ES, Harris JA, Heger T, Hobbs RJ, Murphy SD, Suding KN (2018) Keep ecological restoration open and flexible. Nat Ecol Evol 5:1Google Scholar
- Keenleyside KA, Dudley N, Cairns S, Hall CM, Stolton S (2012) Ecological restoration for protected areas: principles, guidelines and best practices. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
- McDonald T, Gann GD, Jonson K, Dixon KW (2016) International standards for the practice of ecological restoration—including principles and key concepts. Society for Ecological Restoration, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Miller BP, Sinclair EA, Menz MH, Elliott CP, Bunn E, Commander LE, Dalziell E, David E, Davis B, Erickson TE, Golos PJ, Mayence CE, Merino-Martín L, Merritt DJ, Nevill PG, Phillips RD, Ritchie AL, Ruoss S, Stevens JC (2017) A framework for the practical science necessary to restore sustainable, resilient, and biodiverse ecosystems. Restor Ecol 25:605–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reddell P, Spain AV, Milnes AR, Hopkins M, Highnett CT, Joyce S, Playfair LA (1993) Indicators of ecosystem recovery in rehabilitated areas of the open strip bauxite mine, Gove, Northern Territory. CSIRO Minesite Rehabilitation Research Program Report to Nabalco Pty Ltd Gove Joint Venture, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
- Smith A (2012) Events and urban regeneration: the strategic use of events to revitalise cities. Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Society for Ecological Restoration (2004) The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration, TucsonGoogle Scholar
- Stevens JC, Rokich DP, Newton VJ, Barrett RL, Dixon KW (2016) Banksia woodlands: a restoration guide for the Swan Coastal Plain. UWA Publishing, PerthGoogle Scholar
- van Andel J, Aronson J (eds) (2012) Restoration ecology: the new frontier, 2nd edn. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Wardell-Johnson G, Wardell-Johnson A, Bradby K, Robinson T, Bateman PW, Williams K, Keesing A, Braun K, Beckerling J, Burbridge M (2016) Application of a Gondwanan perspective to restore ecological integrity in the southwestern Australian global biodiversity hotspot. Restor Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12372 Google Scholar