Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of the quality of reverse osmosis-treated coal bed water in relation to its effect on soil health

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the time of extraction of coal bed methane (CBM) gas, vast quantity of imbedded water is also simultaneously released to the surface. Quality of this water is generally very poor owing to high salt content, and discharge of such water to the land surface frequently results in serious deterioration of the soil health through expansion of salinity and alkalinity problems. Use of reverse osmosis (RO) technology has appeared to be an effective proposition for bringing down the ionic concentrations of coal bed water (CBW) and facilitating their safe release. However, reclaiming the large volume of CBW through RO is expensive and is difficult to be afforded by many CBM producers from developing countries. In this study, we assessed the possibility of releasing an intermediate-quality RO-treated CBW which will not affect the health of the flooded soils and also will involve lesser cost of RO operation. The study showed that the quality of RO-treated CBW below 2 mmho/cm did not affect the incubated soil very adversely with regard to the major soil health attributes. However, exchangeable sodium percentage of the RO water-treated soil exhibited sharp increments when the EC value of the RO water increased to 2.0 mmho/cm resulting in development of high alkalinity. It is, therefore, suggested that while treating CBW with RO technology for discharging the resultant water to adjacent areas, it is not necessary to produce highly purified reclaimed water. Instead of going for high level of reclamation, discharge of a moderate-quality treated water may be an effective proposition for improving the economy of CBW reclamation without affecting the health of the CBW-influenced soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allenman D (2010) Considerations for treating water associated with shales gas development. In: Symposium of groundwater protection council on water/energy sustainability, Pennsylvania

  • APHA (1981) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, p 1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Badia-Fabregat M, Lucas D, Gros M, Rodríguez-Mozaz S, Barceló D, Caminal G, Vicent T (2015) Identification of some factors affecting pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) removal in real wastewater. Case study of fungal treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate. J Hazard Mater 283:663–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay GN, Mandal LN (1980) Inorganic transformation of applied phosphorus in brackish water fish pond soil of West Bengal. Hydrobiologia 71(1–2):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra R (1996) Soil salinity and water quality. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Doulati Ardejani F, Shokri BJ, Moradzadeh A, Soleimani E, Ansari Jafari M (2008) A combined mathematical geophysical model for prediction of pyrite oxidation and pollutant leaching associated with a coal washing waste dump. Int J Environ Sci Technol 5(4):517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1–42. doi:10.2307/3001478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores R, Stricker G, Meyer J, Doll T, Norton P Jr, Livingston R., Jennings MC (2001) A field conference on effects of coalbed methane development in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming. USGS Denver, CO. Open-File Report 01–126

  • Gupta BR, Bajpai PD (1974) Soil microbiological studies in salt affected soils I. Pattern of soil microbial population as affected by salinity-alkalinity conditions. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 22:176–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson B, Grattan SR, Fulton A (1993) Agricultural salinity and drainage: a handbook for water managers. University of California Irrigation Program, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada Y, Inoko A (1980) The measurement of the cation exchange capacity of composts for the estimation of the degree of maturity. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 26:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Oxford & IBH Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatib Z, Verbeek P (2003) Water to value—produced water management for sustainable field development of mature and green fields. J Pet Technol 55(1):26–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majee U, Chattopadhyay GN, Roy BC, Chaudhury S, Shekhar S (2012) Possibility of using some amendments in mitigating the adverse effects of coal bed water on soil environment. In: Proceedings on international conference on nuclear energy environment and biological science, Bangkok, pp 68–70

  • Majee U, Chattopadhyay GN, Chaudhury S (2015) Monitoring of soil environment under influence of coal bed water. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeth IH, Reddy KJ, Skinner QD (2003) Chemistry of coalbed methane product water in three Wyoming watersheds. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39:575–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendhe VA, Mishra S, Varma AK, Singh AP (2015) Coal bed methane-produced water quality and its management options in Raniganj Basin, West Bengal, India. Appl Water Sci. doi:10.1007/s13201-015-0326-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Minhas PS, Gupta RK (1992) Quality of irrigation water-assessment and management. ICAR Pub, New Delhi, p 123

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal S, Wickramasinghe SR (2008) Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 322:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KJ, Whitman AJ, Andrew RK (2014) Potential beneficial uses of coalbed natural gas (CBNG) water. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice CA, Ellis MS, Bullock JH Jr (2000) Water co-produced with coalbed methane in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming: preliminary compositional data: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-372, p 20

  • Sawyer CN, McCarty PL, Parkin GF (2000) Chemistry for environmental engineering. Tata McGraw-Hill, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokri BJ, Ardejani FD, Ramazi H, Ali M (2016) Predicting pyrite oxidation and multi-component reactive transport processes from an abandoned coal waste pile by comparing 2D numerical modelling and 3D geo-electrical inversion. Int J Coal Geol. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2016.03.014

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns M, Tindall JA, Cronin G, Friedel MJ, Bergquist E (2005) Effects of coal-bed methane discharge waters on the vegetation and soil ecosystem in powder river basin, Wyoming. Water Air Soil Pollut 168:33–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1966) Diagnosis and Improvement of saline and alkali soils. Hand bk. U.S. Dept Agric No. 60

  • USGS (2000) Water produced with coal-bed methane. USGS Fact Sheet FS-156-00, http://www.usgs.gov, pp 1–2

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to ESSAR Oil Ltd., Durgapur, India, for supporting the study. The first author is grateful to Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, for providing Inspire fellowship to him for working in this programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Utpal Majee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majee, U., Chattopadhyay, G.N. & Chaudhury, S. Optimization of the quality of reverse osmosis-treated coal bed water in relation to its effect on soil health. Environ Earth Sci 76, 474 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6809-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6809-0

Keywords

Navigation