Advertisement

Landfill site selection using combination of fuzzy logic and multi-attribute decision-making approach

  • Ahmad Jamshidi-Zanjani
  • Majid Rezaei
Original Article

Abstract

During the last decades, growth of urbanization and industrialization led to an increase in solid waste generation. Landfilling is the most prevalent ultimate disposal method for the municipal solid wastes in developing countries. The rapid municipal solid waste generation in Markazi province (central part of Iran) causes the need for precision in finding a suitable landfill site selection. In the present study, 12 factors (environmental and socioeconomic factors) have been applied to select the landfill site in Markazi province, Iran. The different methods including the analytic network process (ANP) combined with fuzzy linguistic quantifier, ordered weighted average (OWA), and weighted linear combination (WLC) approach in geographic information system was applied to find an appropriate landfill site. The OWA operator function permits the evaluation of the wide spectrum of consequences (with different scenario) obtained from different management strategies. Results revealed that integration of fuzzy logic, ANP, and OWA provides flexible and better ideas compared to the Boolean logic and WLC to select a suitable landfill site.

Keywords

Landfill site selection Ordered-Weighted Average Analytic Network Process Geographic information systems Multi-attribute decision-making 

References

  1. Abd-El Monsef H (2015) Optimization of municipal landfill siting in the Red Sea coastal desert using geographic information system, remote sensing and an analytical hierarchy process. Environ Earth Sci 74(3):2283–2296. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4220-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afzali A, Sabri S, Rashid M, Samani JM, Ludin AN (2014) Inter-municipal landfill site selection using analytic network process. Water Resour Manag 28(8):2179–2194. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0605-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexakis DD, Sarris A (2014) Integrated GIS and remote sensing analysis for landfill sitting in Western Crete, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 72(2):467–482. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2966-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arkoc O (2014) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection using geographical information systems: a case study from Çorlu, Turkey. Arab J Geosci 7(11):4975–4985. doi: 10.1007/s12517-013-1107-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahrani S, Ebadi T, Ehsani H, Yousefi H, Maknoon R (2016) Modeling landfill site selection by multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy functions in GIS, case study: Shabestar, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 75(4):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5146-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beskese A, Demir HH, Ozcan HK, Okten HE (2015) Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul. Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3513–3521. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3635-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boroushaki S, Malczewski J (2008) Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Comput Geosci 34(4):399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eastman JR (2003) IDRISI Kilimanjaro: guide to GIS and image processing. Clark Labs, Clark University, WorcesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Eskandari M, Homaee M, Mahmoodi S, Pazira E, Van Genuchten MT (2015) Optimizing landfill site selection by using land classification maps. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(10):7754–7765. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4182-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferretti V, Pomarico S (2013) Ecological land suitability analysis through spatial indicators: an application of the Analytic Network Process technique and ordered weighted average approach. Ecol Indic 34:507–519. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Isalou AA, Zamani V, Shahmoradi B, Alizadeh H (2013) Landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy logic and Analytic Network Process (F-ANP). Environ Earth Sci 68(6):1745–1755. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-1865-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan S, Faisal MN (2008) An Analytic Network Process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag 28(9):1500–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kharat MG, Kamble SJ, Raut RD, Kamble SS, Dhume SM (2016) Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(2):1–16. doi: 10.1007/s40808-016-0106-x Google Scholar
  14. Makropoulos CK, Butler D (2006) Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. Enviro Model Software 21(1):69–84. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Malczewski J (2006) Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 8(4):270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2006.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malczewski J, Rinner C (2005) Exploring multicriteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: a case study of residential quality evaluation. J Geogr Syst 7(2):249–268. doi: 10.1007/s10109-005-0159-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moeinaddini M, Khorasani N, Danehkar A, Darvishsefat AA (2010) Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste Manag 30(5):912–920. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Motlagh ZK, Sayadi MH (2015) Siting MSW landfills using MCE methodology in GIS environment (Case study: Birjand plain, Iran). Waste Manag 46:322–337. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rahmat ZG, Niri MV, Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei AA, Baboli Z, Hosseinzadeh M (2017) Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(1):111–118. doi: 10.1007/s12205-016-0296-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytical network process. RWS Publications, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  22. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the Analytic Network Process: economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Shahabi H, Keihanfard S, Ahmad BB, Amiri MJ (2014) Evaluating Boolean, AHP and WLC methods for the selection of waste landfill sites using GIS and satellite images. Environ Earth Sci 71(9):4221–4233. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2816-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Uyan M (2014) MSW landfill site selection by combining AHP with GIS for Konya, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 71(4):1629–1639. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2567-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 18(1):183–190. doi: 10.1109/21.87068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zadeh LA (1997) Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst 90(2):111–127. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00077-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining, Faculty of EngineeringTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations