Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing groundwater vulnerability using GIS-based DRASTIC model for Ahmedabad district, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research aims to derive the intrinsic vulnerability of groundwater against contamination using the GIS platform. The study applies DRASTIC model for Ahmedabad district in Gujarat, India. The model uses parameters like depth, recharge, aquifer, soil, topography, vadose zone and hydraulic conductivity, which depict the hydrogeology of the area. The research demonstrates that northern part of district with 46.4% of area is under low vulnerability, the central and southern parts with 48.4% of the area are under moderate vulnerability, while 5.2% of area in the south-east of district is under high vulnerability. It is observed from the study that lower vulnerability in northern part may be mostly due to the greater depth of vadose zone, deeper water tables and alluvial aquifer system with minor clay lenses. The moderate and high vulnerability in central and southern parts of study area may be due to lesser depth to water tables, smaller vadose zone depths, unconfined to semi-confined alluvial aquifer system and greater amount of recharge due to irrigation practices. Further, the map removal and single-parameter sensitivity analysis indicate that groundwater vulnerability index has higher influence of vadose zone, recharge, depth and aquifer parameters for the given study area. The research also contributes to validating the existence of higher concentrations of contaminants/indicators like electrical conductivity, chloride, total dissolved solids, sulphate, nitrate, calcium, sodium and magnesium with respect to groundwater vulnerability status in the study area. The contaminants/indicators exceeding the prescribed limits for drinking water as per Indian Standard 10500 (1991) were mostly found in areas under moderate and high vulnerability. Finally, the research successfully delineates the groundwater vulnerability in the region which can aid land-use policies and norms for activities related to recharge and seepage with respect to existing status of groundwater vulnerability and its quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1985) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. U.S. EPA, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. U.S. EPA, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora PK, Rawat SN, Chhabra SS, Prakash S (1996) Evaluation of recharge to groundwater due to applied irrigation under different crops in Uttar Pradesh using isotope tracer technique—a field study. In: Singh VP, Kumar B (Eds) Subsurface-water hydrology, vol 16. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 119–130

  • Babiker IS, Mohamed MA, Tetsuya H, Kikuo K (2005) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. Sci Total Environ 345(1–3):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer H (1978) Groundwater hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC (1995) Nature and properties of soils book. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Ground Water Board (2014) Dynamic groundwater resources of india. Ministry of Water Resources, Faridabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Paul P, Sikdar P (2007) Assessing aquifer vulnerability to arsenic pollution using DRASTIC and GIS of North Bengal. J Spat Hydrol 7(1):101–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekar H, Ranganna G, Nataraju C (2000) Assessment of groundwater pollution potential through remote sensing and GIS technique a case study for Anekal taluk, Bangalore urban district, India. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens 33(Part B7):258–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitsazan M, Akhtari Y (2009) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kherran Plain, Khuzestan, Iran. Water Resour Manag 23:1137–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture and Cooperation (2008) Agriculture contingency plan for district. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Ahmedabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Planning Collaborative (1998) Proposal for Sabarmati riverfront development, Ahmedabad. Environmental Planning Collaborative, Ahmedabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteller MV, Rodríguez R, Cardona A, Padilla-Sánchez L (2012) Evaluation of hydrochemical changes due to intensive aquifer exploitation case studies from Mexico. Environ Monit Assess 184:5725–5741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster S, Hirata R, Gomes D, D’Elia M, Paris M (2002) Groundwater quality protection. Washington, DC, The World Bank

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gogu RC, Dassargues A (2000a) Sensitivity analysis for the EPIK method of vulnerability assessment in a small karstic aquifer, southern Belgium. Hydrogeol J 8:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogu R, Dassargues A (2000b) Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ Geol 39(6):549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupte PR (2011) Ahmedabad–Gandhinagar Twin City, Gujarat. In: Central Ground Water Board, Ground water scenario in major cities of India. Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, Faridabad, pp 7–17

  • Jamrah A, Al-Futaisi A, Rajmohan N, Al-Yaroubi Saif (2008) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method GIS environment. Environ Monit Assess 147:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidzadeh Z, Mirbagheri SA (2011) Evaluation of groundwater quantity and quality in the Kashan Basin, Central Iran. Desalination 270(1–3):23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaliraj S, Chandrasekar N, Simon Peter T, Selvakumar S, Magesh NS (2015) Mapping of coastal aquifer vulnerable zone in the south west coast of Kanyakumari, South India, using GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environ Monit Assess 187:4073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur R, Rosin KG (2009) Ground water vulnerability assessment—challenges and opportunities. 5th asian regional conf. of INCID, central groundwater board, ministry of water resources. New Delhi, India

  • Khemiri S, Khnissi A, Alaya MB, Saidi S, Zargouni F (2013) Using GIS for the comparison of intrinsic parametric methods assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in scenarios of semi arid climate. The case of Foussana groundwater in the central of Tunisia. J Water Resour Prot 5:835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodwick WA, Monson W, Svoboda L (1990) Attribute error and sensitivity analysis of map operations in geographical information systems: suitability analysis. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 4(4):413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margat J, van der Gun J (2013) Groundwater around the World: a geographic synopsis. CRC Press, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoud MH, Osta MM (2016) Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability in El-Bahariya Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt. J Earth Syst Sci 125(6):1139–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Urban Development (2011) Report on Indian urban infrastructure and services. Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources (2009) Groundwater estimation methodology. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano P, Fabbri AG (1996) Single-parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. HydroGIS 96 Appl Geogr Inf Syst Hydrol Water Resour 235:559–566

  • National Research Council (1993) Ground water vulnerability assessment: predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Piscopo G (2001) Groundwater vulnerability map explanatory notes Castlereagh catchment. Centre for natural resources, NSW department of land and water conservation, Parramatta

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geog 28(1):32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao SM, Mamatha P (2004) Water quality in sustainable water management. Curr Sci 87(7):942–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundquist DC, Peters AJ, Di L, Rodekohr DA, Ehrman RL, Murray G (1991) Statewide groundwater-vulnerability assessment in nebraska using the drastic/GIS model. Geocarto Int 6(2):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert MG (1999) Improvements to the DRASTIC ground-water vulnerability mapping method. United States Geological Survey, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Secunda S, Collin ML, Melloul AJ (1998) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel’s Sharon region. J Environ Manag 54(1):39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamsuddin S (2000) A study of groundwater pollution vulnerability using DRASTIC/GIS, West Bengal, India. J Environ Hydrol 8:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi SM, Imran HM, Akib S, Yusop Z, Harun ZB (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka state of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci 70:2293–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobowale A, Ramalan AA, Mudiare OJ, Oyebode MA (2014) Groundwater recharge studies in irrigated lands in Nigeria: implications for basin sustainability. Sustain Water Qual Ecol 3–4:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP/CGWB (1976) Groundwater surveys in Rajasthan and Gujarat, India, Technical Report. United Nations, New York

  • Vrba J, Zaporozec A (eds) (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International association of hydrogeologists, vol 16. International Contributions to Hydrogeology, Hannover, Heise

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2003) Sodium in drinking water (Report No. WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/15). WHO, Geneva

  • Working Group Report to Planning Commission (2011) Sustainable groundwater management. Working Group Report

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CEPT University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

    Mona Khakhar & Anjana Vyas

  2. Institute of Technology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

    Jayesh P. Ruparelia

Authors
  1. Mona Khakhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jayesh P. Ruparelia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anjana Vyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mona Khakhar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khakhar, M., Ruparelia, J.P. & Vyas, A. Assessing groundwater vulnerability using GIS-based DRASTIC model for Ahmedabad district, India. Environ Earth Sci 76, 440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6761-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6761-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation