Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combining AHP and genetic algorithms approaches to modify DRASTIC model to assess groundwater vulnerability: a case study from Jianghan Plain, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate identification of vulnerability areas is critical for groundwater resources protection and management. The present study employed the modified DRASTIC model to assess the groundwater vulnerability of Jianghan Plain, a major farming area in central China. DRASTICL model was developed by incorporating the land use factor to the original model. The ratings and weightings of the selected parameters were optimized by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and genetic algorithms (GAs) method, respectively. A combined AHP–GAs method was proposed to further develop this methodology. The unity-based normalization process was employed to categorize the vulnerability maps into four types, such as very high (>0.75), high (0.5–0.75), low (0.25–0.5), and very low (<0.25). The accuracy of vulnerability mapping was validated by Pearson’s correlation coefficient between vulnerability index and the nitrate concentration in groundwater and analysis of variance F statistic. The results revealed that the modified DRASTIC model had a large improvement over the conventional model. The correlation coefficient increased significantly from 41.07 to 75.31% after modification. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the depth to groundwater with 39.28% of mean effective weight was the most critical factor affecting the groundwater vulnerability. The developed vulnerability model proposed in this study could provide important objective information for groundwater and environmental management at local level and innovation for international researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Hanbali A, Kondoh A (2008) Groundwater vulnerability assessment and evaluation of human activity impact (HAI) within the Dead Sea groundwater basin, Jordan. Hydrogeol J 16:499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr J, Petty R, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. EPA, Washington, EPA-600/2-87-035

  • Baalousha H (2010) Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: A case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. Agric Water Manag 97:240–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiker IS, Mohamed MA, Hiyama T, Kato K (2005) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. Sci Total Environ 345:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty S, Mohanty A, Ghosh B, Tarafdar M, Aggarwal SG, Gupta PK (2013) Proficiency testing in chemical analysis of iron ore: comparison of statistical methods for outlier rejection. Mapan 29:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Sun X, Ma T, Zhang W (1985) A preliminary study on environmental geology of cold spring paddy soil in Jinaghan Plain, Hubei Province (in Chinese). Hubei Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Wuhan

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitsazan M, Akhtari Y (2008) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kherran Plain, Khuzestan, Iran. Water Resour Manag 23:1137–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Y, Gan Y, Wang Y, Deng Y, Guo X, Dong C (2015) Temporal variation of groundwater level and arsenic concentration at Jianghan Plain, central China. J Geochem Explor 149:106–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan Y, Wang Y, Duan Y, Deng Y, Guo X, Ding X (2014) Hydrogeochemistry and arsenic contamination of groundwater in the Jianghan Plain, central China. J Geochem Explor 138:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacobbo F, Marseguerra M, Zio E (2002) Solving the inverse problem of parameter estimation by genetic algorithms: the case of a groundwater contaminant transport model. Ann Nucl Energy 29:967–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogu RC, Dassargues A (2000) Sensitivity analysis for the EPIK method of vulnerability assessment in a small karstic aquifer, southern Belgium. Hydrogeol J 8:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan Y, Zhang L, Hu X, Xiang J, Wang F (2016) National survey and evaluation groundwater and environment in Jianghan–Dongting Plain (in Chinese). Hubei Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Wuhan

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad M, Hachemi H, Taibi H (2015) Assessment of Gravity Anomaly Surfaces (DTU10, EGM2008 and ITG-Goce02) in Western Mediterranean Sea. Mediterr J Model Simul 3:87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Espriú A et al (2014) The DRASTIC-Sg model: an extension to the DRASTIC approach for mapping groundwater vulnerability in aquifers subject to differential land subsidence, with application to Mexico City. Hydrogeol J 22:1469–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. University of Michigan Press, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Huan H, Wang J, Teng Y (2012) Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Jilin City of northeast China. Sci Total Environ 440:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javadi S, Kavehkar N, Mohammadi K, Khodadadi A, Kahawita R (2011a) Calibrating DRASTIC using field measurements, sensitivity analysis and statistical methods to assess groundwater vulnerability. Water Int 36:719–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javadi S, Kavehkar N, Mousavizadeh MH, Mohammadi K (2011b) Modification of DRASTIC model to map groundwater vulnerability to pollution using nitrate measurements in agricultural areas. J Agric Sci Technol 13:239–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z, Yang C (1996) Evaluation of machine selection by the AHP method. J Mater Process Technol 57:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, S-Y Wang, D-M Li (2014) The analysis of the impact of land-use changes on flood exposure of Wuhan in Yangtze River Basin, China. Water Resour Manage 28:2507–2522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2008) Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano P, Fabbri AG (1996) Single-parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In: Paper presented at the HydroGIS 96: application of geographical information systems in hydrology and water resources management, Proceedings of Vienna conference, April 1996

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B, Pirasteh S, Shafri HZM (2013) Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 71:3119–3131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B, Dadras M (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neukum C, Azzam R (2009) Quantitative assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability to contamination using numerical simulations. Sci Total Environ 408:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi S, Shadman Roodposhti M, Ali Abbaspour R (2014) Using combined AHP–genetic algorithm in artificial groundwater recharge site selection of Gareh Bygone Plain, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 72:1979–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Secunda S, Collin ML, Melloul AJ (1998) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel’s Sharon region. J Environ Manage 54:39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener E, Davraz A (2012) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 21:701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener E, Sener S, Davraz A (2009) Assessment of aquifer vulnerability based on GIS and DRASTIC methods: a case study of the Senirkent-Uluborlu Basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 17:2023–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi SM, Imran HM, Akib S, Yusop Z, Harun ZB (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka State of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci 70:2293–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirumalaivasan D, Karmegam M, Venugopal K (2003) AHP–DRASTIC: software for specific aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC model and GIS. Environ Model Softw 18:645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85:274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin L, Zhang E, Wang X, Wenninger J, Dong J, Guo L, Huang J (2012) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in the Ordos Plateau, China. Environ Earth Sci 69:171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Chen S, Fu J (2014a) Analysis of three-nitrogen concentration and spatial-temporal distribution of groundwater in Sihu Region (in Chinese). Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 23:1295–1330

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Gao L, Jiao X, Yu J, Su X, Du S (2014b) Occurrence assessment of earth fissure based on genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks in Su-Xi-Chang land subsidence area, China. Geosci J 18:485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, Liu Z, Xiong Q (2007) The vulnerability evaluation for groundwater pollution in Jianghan Plain (in Chinese). Resour Environ Eng 21:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Wang Y, Li Y, Zwahlen F, Boillat J (2012) Hydrogeochemical characteristics of central Jianghan Plain, China. Environ Earth Sci 68:765–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by China Geological Survey (Nos. 1212011121142 and 1212011120084). The authors would like to thank Dr. Quanrong Wang and the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions which greatly improve the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhonghua Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J., Tang, Z., Jiao, T. et al. Combining AHP and genetic algorithms approaches to modify DRASTIC model to assess groundwater vulnerability: a case study from Jianghan Plain, China. Environ Earth Sci 76, 426 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6759-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6759-6

Keywords

Navigation