Abstract
Most multiple-fractured horizontal wells experience long-term linear flow due to the ultralow permeability of shale gas reservoirs. Considering the existence of natural fractures caused by compression and shear stresses during the process of tectonic movement or the expansion of high-pressure gas, a shale gas reservoir can be more appropriately described by dual-porosity medium. Based on the assumption of slab dual-porosity, this paper uses the trilinear flow model to simulate the transient production behavior of multiple-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs, which takes the desorption of adsorbed gas, Knudsen diffusion and gas slippage flow in the shale matrix into consideration. Production decline curves are plotted with the Stehfest numerical inversion algorithm, and sensitivity analysis is done to identify the most influential reservoir and hydraulic fracture parameters. It was found that the density and permeability of the natural fracture network are the most important parameters affecting the production dynamics of multiple-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs. The higher the density and permeability of the natural fractures are, the shorter the time is required to exploit the same amount of reserve, which means a faster investment payoff period. The analytical model presented in this paper can provide some insight into the reserve evaluation and production prediction for shale gas reservoirs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Cross-sectional area, πR 2m (m)
- B g :
-
Volume factor of shale gas (m3/Sm3)
- c t :
-
Total compressibility (P/a)
- D k :
-
Knudsen diffusion coefficient (m2/s)
- d F :
-
Distance between hydraulic fractures (m)
- F :
-
Gas slippage factor, dimensionless
- h :
-
Reservoir thickness, h =h mt + h ft (m)
- h k :
-
Equilibrium thickness of kerogen (m)
- h f :
-
Thickness of each natural fracture (m)
- h m :
-
Thickness of each matrix slab (m)
- h ft :
-
Total thickness of natural fracture (m)
- h mt :
-
Total thickness of slab matrix, h mt = nh m (m)
- J D :
-
Mass flux caused by Knudsen diffusion (kg/(m2 s))
- J a :
-
Mass flux caused by slippage flow (kg/(m2 s))
- k :
-
Permeability (m2)
- k 1f :
-
Permeability in the fracture system of region 1 (m2)
- k 2f :
-
Permeability in the fracture system of region 2 (m2)
- K n :
-
Knudsen number, decimal
- L e :
-
Length of horizontal wellbore (m)
- m :
-
Pseudo-pressure
- M :
-
Molecular weight of gas (kg/kmol)
- N :
-
Number of natural fractures
- n F :
-
Number of hydraulic fractures
- p :
-
Pressure (Pa)
- p L :
-
Langmuir pressure (Pa)
- q F :
-
One-fourth flow rate of hydraulic fracture (m3/s)
- R :
-
Gas constant, 8.314 × 103 (Pa m3/(kmol K))
- R m :
-
Pore radius (m)
- S :
-
Laplace transform parameter
- SV:
-
Specific surface area (1/m)
- t :
-
Time (s)
- t a :
-
Pseudo-time (s)
- T :
-
Temperature (K)
- u :
-
Flow velocity caused by Darcy’s flow (m/s)
- V L :
-
Langmuir volume (m3/kg)
- w F :
-
Width of hydraulic fracture (m)
- x F :
-
Half-length of hydraulic fracture (m)
- x e :
-
Outer boundary of outer region (m)
- y e :
-
Outer boundary of inner region (m)
- Z :
-
Z-factor of real gas, dimensionless
- Θ :
-
Apparent permeability coefficient, dimensionless
- α :
-
The tangential momentum accommodation coefficient
- ρ g :
-
Average gas density (kg/m3)
- ρ bi :
-
Rock density (kg/m3)
- ρ gsc :
-
Gas density under standard condition (kg/m3)
- μ g :
-
Gas viscosity (Pa s)
- ω :
-
Storativity ratio, defined in Eq. (4)
- λ:
-
Interporosity flow coefficient, defined in Eq. (5)
- ∅:
-
Porosity, decimal
- η :
-
Transmissibility factor (m2/s)
- 1:
-
Outer region
- 2:
-
Inner region
- avg:
-
Average
- D:
-
Dimensionless
- f:
-
Natural fracture
- F:
-
Hydraulic fracture
- m:
-
Matrix
- mi:
-
Matrix system at initial condition
- fi:
-
Fracture system at initial condition
- i:
-
Initial condition
- sc:
-
Standard condition
- t:
-
Total
References
Azari M, Wooden WO, Coble LE (1990) A complete set of Laplace transforms for finite-conductivity vertical fractures under bilinear and trilinear flows. In: SPE paper 20556 presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans
Bird GA (1994) Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Bohi I, Pooladi-Darvish M, Aguilera R (2011) Modeling fractured horizontal wells as dual porosity composite reservoirs—application to tight gas, shale gas and tight oil cases. In: SPE paper 144057 presented at the SPE Western North American region meeting, Anchorage
Brown M, Ozkan E, Raghavan R, Kazemi H (2009) Practical solutions for pressure transient response of fractured horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs. In: SPE paper 125043 presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans
Curtis JB (2002) Fractured shale-gas systems. AAPG Bull 86(11):1921–1938
Javadpour F, Fisher D, Unsworth M (2007) Nano-scale gas flow in shale gas sediments. J Can Pet Technol 46(10):55–61
Kazemi H (1968) Pressure transient analysis of naturally fractured reservoirs with uniform fracture distribution. SPE J 9(4):451–462
Lee ST, Brockenbrough JR (1986) A new approximate analytic solution for finite-conductivity vertical fractures. SPE F Eval 1(1):75–88
Medeiros F, Ozkan E, Kazemi H (2008) Productivity and drainage and drainage area of fractured horizontal wells in tight gas reservoirs. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 11(5):902–911
Olarewaju JS, Lee WJ (1989) A new analytical model of finite-conductivity hydraulic fracture in a finite reservoir. In: SPE paper 19093 presented at the SPE gas technology symposium, Dallas
Ozkan E, Raghavan R (2010) Modeling of fluid transfer from shale matrix to fracture network. In: SPE paper 134830 presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Florence
Ozkan E, Brown M, Raghavan R, Kazemi H (2009) Comparison of fractured horizontal-well performance in tight sand and shale reservoirs. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 14(2):248–259
Roy S, Raju R, Chuang HF et al (2003) Modeling gas flow through microchannels and nanopores. J Appl Phys 93(8):4870–4879
Van Everdingen AF, Hurst W (1949) The application of Laplace transformation to flow problem in reservoirs. J Pet Technol 12(1):305–324
Wang HT (2014) Performance of multiple fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs with consideration of multiple mechanisms. J Hydrol 510:299–312
Zhang DL, Zhang LH, Zhao YL et al (2015) A composite model to analyze the decline performance of a multiple fractured horizontal well in shale reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 26:999
Zhang RH, Zhang LH, Wang RH et al (2016) Research on transient flow theory of a multiple fractured horizontal well in a composite shale gas reservoir based on the finite-element method. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:587–598
Zhao YL, Zhang LH, Zhao JZ et al (2013) “Triple porosity” modeling of transient well test and rate decline analysis for multi-fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng 110:253–262
Zhao YL, Zhang LH, Luo JX, Zhang BN (2014) Performance of fractured horizontal well with stimulated reservoir volume in unconventional gas reservoir. J Hydrol 512:447–456
Zhao YL, Zhang LH, Feng GQ et al (2016a) Performance analysis of fractured wells with stimulated reservoir volume in coal seam reservoirs. Oil Gas Sci Technol 71(1):1–10
Zhao YL, Zhang LH, Xiong Y et al (2016b) Pressure response and production performance for multi-fractured horizontal wells with complex seepage mechanism in box-shaped shale gas reservoir. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 32:66–80
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Key Program) (Grant No. 51534006), and the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (Grant No. 51125019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Governing equation in shale matrix
Based on the mass conservation law, and considering Knudsen diffusion and the slippage flow, we can derive the following equation to describe gas flow in a shale matrix:
where q d is the mass of gas desorbed per unit rock, and can be expressed as
For gas reservoirs, gas properties are always functions of reservoir pressure, thus Eq. (33) is a linear partial differential equation. Pseudo-pressure and pseudo-time are adopted to linearize the equation.
With the equation of state and the definitions of pseudo-pressure and pseudo-time, Eq. (33) becomes
where \(k_{\text{am}} = \tilde{k}_{\text{m}} \left( {F + \frac{{\mu_{\text{g}} c_{\text{g}} D_{\text{k}} }}{{\tilde{k}_{\text{m}} }}} \right) = \tilde{k}_{\text{m}} \theta_{\text{m}}\) and \(\theta_{\text{m}} = F + \frac{{\mu_{\text{g}} c_{\text{g}} D_{\text{k}} }}{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{k}_{\text{m}} }}\).
The definitions of pseudo-time and pseudo-pressure are
and
If we define the following group of parameters as an adsorption index,
Eq. (35) can be simplified as
With the definitions of dimensionless parameters given in “Definitions of parameters” section, one can obtain the dimensionless governing equation for a shale matrix.
Appendix 2: Governing equation in a natural fracture system
Based on the mass conservation law, the following equation can be obtained for a natural fracture system in the outer region:
where q 1m is the source item, representing the volumetric gas flow rate from a unit of shale matrix to a natural fracture system, and can be expressed as
Substituting Eq. (41) into Eq. (40), and with the equation of state and the definitions of pseudo-pressure and pseudo-time, we can obtain the final expression of a governing equation for a natural fracture system in the outer region:
Similarly, the final expression of a governing equation for a natural fracture system in the inner region can be obtained as follows:
With the definitions of dimensionless parameters given in “Definitions of parameters” section, one can obtain the dimensionless forms of Eqs. (42) and (43).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, Sy., Zhu, Q., Guo, Jj. et al. Production rate analysis of multiple-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs by a trilinear flow model. Environ Earth Sci 76, 388 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6728-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6728-0