Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaluation of liquefaction-resistance of soils using standard penetration test, cone penetration test, and shear-wave velocity data for Dhaka, Chittagong, and Sylhet cities in Bangladesh

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of liquefaction-resistance for saturated loose sandy and silty soils up to a depth of 20 m is an important component of geotechnical site characterization in an earthquake-prone region. In the present study, the standard penetration-test blow count (SPT-N), cone penetration test (CPT) tip resistance (q c), and shear-wave velocity (V s) data of near-surface soils from Dhaka, Chittagong, and Sylhet cities were used to evaluate the liquefaction-resistance by a simplified procedure. At each site in the cities, the liquefaction-resistance is evaluated using a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25 g for a scenario earthquake of magnitude 7.5 (M w). Then, the liquefaction potential index (LPI) is calculated for each site using the safety factors of liquefaction-resistance and thickness of liquefiable soil layers to predict the severity of liquefaction. The results indicate that sand boils (LPI > 5) and lateral spreading (LPI > 12) will be generated due to liquefaction in the Holocene saturated sandy and silty soils in Dhaka, Chittagong, and Sylhet cities. The evaluation of liquefaction-resistance using the SPT-N, q c, and V s data shows considerable variation in the prediction of safety factor and LPI. Therefore, it is necessary to use two or more in situ test data to properly evaluate the liquefaction-resistance of soils for an area; and the simplified procedure needs to be used carefully. The results of the liquefaction-resistance of soils can be used to improve the ground condition in Dhaka, Chittagong and Sylhet cities for the construction of earthquake-resilient structures and future urban development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Aitchison JC, Ali JR, Davis AM (2007) When and where did India and Asia collide? J Geophys Res 112:1978–2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam M, Alam MM, Curray JR (2003) An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin in relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history. Sediment Geol 155:179–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Douglas J (2004) Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes. Geophys J Int 159:165–206. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02323.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (1997) Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity. In: Proceeding of NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Sate University of New York, Buffalo, pp 89–128

  • Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126:1015–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R (2009) The seismic future of cities. Bull Earthq Eng 7:839–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Hough S (2006) Future earthquakes on the Indian subcontinent: inevitable hazard, preventable risk. South Asian J 12:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton AT, Van Arsdale RB, Broughton JH (2001) Liquefaction susceptibility mapping in the city of Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee. Eng Geol 62:207–222. doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00062-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDMP (2009) Seismic hazard and vulnerability assessment of Dhaka, Chittagong and Sylhet city corporation areas. Final report, Comprehensive Disaster Management Programme, Ministry of Food and Disaster Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Chen CJ, Juang CH (2000) Calibration of SPT- and CPT-based liquefaction evaluation methods. In: Mayne P, Hryciw R (eds) Innovations and applications in geotechnical site characterization, vol 97. Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE, Reston, pp 49–64

  • Curray JR, Emmel FJ, Moore DG, Raitt RW (1982) Structure, tectonics, and geological history of the northeastern Indian Ocean. In: Nairn AEM, Stehli FG (eds) The oceans basins and margins. Plenum, New York, pp 399–449

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harder LF (1997) Application of the Becker penetration test for evaluating the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils. In: Proceeding of NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, pp 129–148

  • Heidari T, Andrus RD (2010) Mapping liquefaction potential of aged soil deposits in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina. Eng Geol 112:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer TL (2008) Probabilistic liquefaction hazard mapping. ASCE, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer TL, Noce TE, Bennett MJ et al (2005) Liquefaction at Oceano, California, during the 2003 San Simeon earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:2396–2411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2004) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. In: 11th International conference on soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, and 3rd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Berkeley, pp 32–56

  • Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Tokida K-I, Yasuda S (1978) A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on microzonation, San Francisco, pp 885–896

  • Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F et al (1982) Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In: Proceedings of 3rd international earthquake microzonation conference, Seattle, pp 1319–1330

  • Iwasaki T, Arakawa T, Tokida K-I (1984) Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Int J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 3:49–58. doi:10.1016/0261-7277(84)90027-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Juang CH, Chen CJ, Jiang T, Andrus RD (2000) Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests. Can Geotech J 37:1195–1208. doi:10.1139/t00-064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juang CH, Lu C-C, Hwang J-H (2009) Assessing probability of surface manifestation of liquefaction at a given site in a given exposure time using CPTU. Eng Geol 104:223–231. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuson WF (1978) Definition of terms related to liquefaction. J Geotech Eng Div 104:1197–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Szeliga W (2010) A catalog of felt intensity data for 570 earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:562–569. doi:10.1785/0120080328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurin T, Rangin C (2009) Structure and kinematics of the Indo-Burmese Wedge: Recent and fast growth of the outer wedge. Tectonics 28:1–21. doi:10.1029/2008TC002276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlemiss CS (1885) Report on the Bengal earthquake of July 14, 1885. Rec Geol Surv India 18(4):200–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JP, McIntire WG (1959) Quaternary geology of the Bengal Basin, East Pakistan and India. Bull Geol Soc Am 70:319–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morino M, Kamal ASMM, Muslim D et al (2011) Seismic event of the Dauki Fault in 16th century confirmed by trench investigation at Gabrakhari Village, Haluaghat, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. J Asian Earth Sci 42:492–498. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morino M, Kamal ASMM, Akhter SH et al (2014a) A paleo-seismological study of the Dauki fault at Jaflong, Sylhet, Bangladesh: historical seismic events and an attempted rupture segmentation model. J Asian Earth Sci 91:218–226. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morino M, Monsur MH, Kamal ASMM et al (2014b) Examples of paleo-liquefaction in Bangladesh. J Geol Soc Jpn 120:VII–VIII. doi:10.5575/geosoc.2014.0032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham RD (1899) Report on the great earthquake of 12th June 1897. Mem Geol Surv India 29:1–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen RS (1988) Using the CPT for dynamic response characterization. In: Proceedings of the earthquake engineering and soil dynamics II conference. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 111–117

  • Olsen RS (1997) Cyclic liquefaction based on the cone penetration test. In: Proceeding of NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, pp 225–276

  • Olsen RS, Koester JP (1995) Prediction of liquefaction resistance using the CPT. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on cone penetration testing, CPT’95, Linkoping, Sweden, vol 2. SGS, pp 251–256

  • Raghukanth STG, Dash SK (2010) Evaluation of seismic soil-liquefaction at Guwahati city. Environ Earth Sci 61:355–368. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0347-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MZ, Siddiqua S, Kamal ASMM (2015) Liquefaction hazard mapping by liquefaction potential index for Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Eng Geol 188:137–147. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MZ, Siddiqua S, Kamal ASMM (2016) Shear wave velocity estimation of the near-surface materials of Chittagong City, Bangladesh for seismic site characterization. J Appl Geophys 134:210–225. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann K-U (1993) Geology of Bangladesh. Gebruder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Science Publishers, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Campanella RG (1985) Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT. J Geotech Eng 111:384–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35:442–459. doi:10.1139/t98-017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, de Alba P (1986) Use of SPT and CPT tests for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of sands. In: Clemence SP (ed) Use of in situ tests in geotechnical engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publication, vol 6, pp 281–302

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div 97:1249–1273

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng 109:458–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder Jr LF, Chung R (1984) The influence of SPT procedures on soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Report No. UCB/EERC-84/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

  • Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng 111:1425–1445. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed RB, Cetin KO, Moss RES et al (2001) Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering and seismic site response evaluation. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference and symposium on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics. University of Missouri, Rolla, p SPL-2

  • Sonmez H (2003) Modification of the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction susceptibility mapping for a liquefaction-prone area (Inegol, Turkey). Environ Geol 44:862–871. doi:10.1007/s00254-003-0831-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C (2005) A liquefaction severity index suggested for engineering practice. Environ Geol 48:81–91. doi:10.1007/s00254-005-1263-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark TD, Olson SM (1995) Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories. J Geotech Eng ASCE 121:856–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steckler MS, Akhter SH, Seeber L (2008) Collision of the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta with the Burma Arc: implications for earthquake hazard. Earth Planet Sci Lett 273:367–378. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart M (1920) The Srimangal earthquake of 8th July 1918. Mem Geol Surv India 46(1):1–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Szeliga W, Hough S, Martin S, Bilham R (2010) Intensity, magnitude, location, and attenuation in India for felt earthquakes since 1762. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:570–584. doi:10.1785/0120080329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toprak S, Holzer TL (2003) Liquefaction potential index: field assessment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:315–322. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:4(315)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulamiş K, Kiliç R (2012) Liquefaction potential evaluation of the quaternary alluvium, Western Ankara (Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 67:945–958. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1526-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeats RS, Sieh K, Allen CR (1997) The geology of earthquakes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD et al (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER 14 and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Sieh K (2013) Active tectonic features that pose a seismic threat to Bangladesh. Comprehensive Disaster Management Programme (CDMP) Report, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of British Columbia for supporting this study through University Graduate Fellowship (UGF). The support from the Comprehensive Disaster Management Program (CDMP), Bangladesh, for collecting the data is highly appreciated. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive inputs to improve the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada

    Md. Zillur Rahman & Sumi Siddiqua

Authors
  1. Md. Zillur Rahman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sumi Siddiqua
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumi Siddiqua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahman, M.Z., Siddiqua, S. Evaluation of liquefaction-resistance of soils using standard penetration test, cone penetration test, and shear-wave velocity data for Dhaka, Chittagong, and Sylhet cities in Bangladesh. Environ Earth Sci 76, 207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6533-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6533-9

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Sumi Siddiqua View author profile