Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 76:125 | Cite as

Mapping and detection of land use change in a coal mining area using object-based image analysis

  • Wenming Pei
  • Suping Yao
  • Joseph F. Knight
  • Shaochun Dong
  • Keith Pelletier
  • Lian P. Rampi
  • Yan Wang
  • Jim Klassen
Original Article

Abstract

Object-based image analysis was used to map land use in the Panxie coal mining area, East China, where long-term underground coal mines have been exploited since the 1980s. A rule-based classification approach was developed for a Pleiades image to identify the desired land use classes, and the same rule-based classification strategies, after the threshold values had been modified slightly, were applied to the Landsat series images. Five land use classes were successfully captured with overall accuracies of between 80 and 94%. The classification approach was validated for its flexibility and robustness. Multitemporal classification results indicated that land use changed considerably in the Panxie coal mining area from 1989 to 2013. The urban, coal and coal gangue, and water areas increased rapidly in line with the growth in mine production. Urban areas increased from 9.38 to 20.92% and showed a tendency to increase around the coal mines. From 1989 to 2013 the coal and coal gangue area increased by 40-fold, from 0.02 to 0.58%. Similarly, the water area increased from 2.77 to 7.84% over this time period, mainly attributable to the spread of waterlogged areas. The waterlogged areas increased to about 2900 ha in 2013, which was about 80 times more than their area in 1989. In contrast, the area of cultivated land was negatively related to the increase in mine production and decreased from 73.11 to 57.25%. The results of this study provide a valuable basis for sustainable land management and environmental planning in the Panxie coal mining area.

Keywords

Coal mining area Land subsidence Land use change Object-based image analysis (OBIA) Waterlogged area 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program (No. 2012BAC10B02), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC: 41372353), and the Huainan Mining Group (No. HNKY-JT-JS-(2013)-004).

References

  1. Baatz M, Schäpe A (2000) Multiresolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. Beiträge zum AGIT XII:12–23Google Scholar
  2. Belgiu M, Drǎguţ L, Strobl J (2014) Quantitative evaluation of variations in rule-based classifications of land cover in urban neighbourhoods using WorldView-2 imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm 87:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bian Z, Lu Q (2013) Ecological effects analysis of land use change in coal mining area based on ecosystem service valuing: a case study in Jiawang. Environ Earth Sci 68:1619–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bian Z, Zhang Y (2006) Land use changes in Xuzhou coal mining area. Acta Geograph Sin 61:349–358Google Scholar
  5. Bian Z, Inyang HI, Daniels JL, Otto F, Struthers S (2010) Environmental issues from coal mining and their solutions. Min Sci Technol 20:215–223Google Scholar
  6. Blaschke T (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm 65:2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaschke T, Hay GJ, Kelly M, Lang S, Hofmann P (2014) Geographic object-based image analysis-towards a new paradigm. ISPRS J Photogramm 87:180–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunting P, Lucas R (2006) The delineation of tree crowns in Australian mixed species forests using hyperspectral compact airborne spectrographic imager (CASI) data. Remote Sens Environ 101:230–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Shi P, Fung T, Wang J, Li X (2007) Object-oriented classification for urban land cover mapping with ASTER imagery. Int J Remote Sens 28:4645–4651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen X, Zhang ZC, Chen XH, Shi P (2009) The impact of land use and land cover changes on soil moisture and hydraulic conductivity along the karst hillslopes of southwest China. Environ Earth Sci 59:811–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleve C, Kelly M, Kearns FR, Moritz M (2008) Classification of the wildland–urban interface: a comparison of pixel-and object-based classifications using high-resolution aerial photography. Comput Environ Urban Syst 32:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desclée B, Bogaert P, Defourny P (2006) Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sens Environ 102:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong S, Yin H, Yao S, Zhang F (2013) Detecting surface subsidence in coal mining area based on DInSAR technique. J Earth Sci 24:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Du P, Zhang H, Liu P, Tan K, Yin Z (2007) Land use/cover change in mining areas using multi-source remotely sensed imagery. In: IEEE International Workshop on Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing images, Leuven, pp 1–7 Google Scholar
  15. Espindola GM, Câmara G, Reis IA, Bins LS, Monteiro AM (2006) Parameter selection for region-growing image segmentation algorithms using spatial autocorrelation. Int J Remote Sens 27:3035–3040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feyisa GL, Meilby H, Fensholt R, Proud SR (2014) Automated water extraction index: a new technique for surface water mapping using Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ 140:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foody GM (2011) Classification accuracy assessment. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Soc News 1:8–14Google Scholar
  18. Gao B (1996) NDWI—a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens Environ 58:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao Y, Kerle N, Mas JF (2009) Object-based image analysis for coal fire-related land cover mapping in coal mining areas. Geocarto Int 24:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haralick RM (1979) Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 67(5):786–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu Z, Zhao Y (2007) Report of the space-time evolution and countermeasures of the subsidence land reclamation in Yanzhou Coal Mining area. Dissertation, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Hu Z, Xu X, Zhao Y (2012) Dynamic monitoring of land subsidence in mining area from multi-source remote-sensing data–a case study at Yanzhou, China. Int J Remote Sens 33:5528–5545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang X, Lu Q, Zhang L (2014) A multi-index learning approach for classification of high-resolution remotely sensed images over urban areas. ISPRS J Photogramm 90:36–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen JR (1981) Urban change detection mapping using Landsat digital data. Am Cartograph 8:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiao L, Liu Y, Li H (2012) Characterizing land-use classes in remote sensing imagery by shape metrics. ISPRS J Photogramm 72:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kindu M, Schneider T, Teketay D, Knoke T (2013) Land use/land cover change analysis using object-based classification approach in Munessa–Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian Highlands. Remote Sens 5:2411–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li JM (2013) Study on flood storage and water logging control in middle course of Huaihe River mining subsidence area. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR)Google Scholar
  28. Li XM (2013b) The city greening in energy city-Huainan. Land Green 7:21 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  29. Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, Moran E (2004) Change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sens 25:2365–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu D, Hetrick S, Moran E (2011) Impervious surface mapping with QuickBird imagery. Int J Remote Sens 32:2519–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ma X, Liu C (2011) Information extraction of mining-land use based on automatic threshold classification of decision tree. In: 2011 International conference on remote sensing, environment and transportation engineering, pp 421–424Google Scholar
  32. MacFeeters SK (1996) The use of Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water feature. Int J Remote Sens 17:1425–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moffett KB, Gorelick SM (2013) Distinguishing wetland vegetation and channel features with object-based image segmentation. Int J Remote Sens 34:1332–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Grossman-Clarke S, Weng Q (2011) Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ 115:1145–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Neil-Dunne J, Pelletier K, Macfaden S, Troy A, Grove JM (2009) Object-based high-resolution land-cover mapping. In: International conference on geoinformatics IEEE pp 1–6Google Scholar
  36. Ouma YO, Tateishi R (2006) A water index for rapid mapping of shoreline changes of five East African Rift Valley lakes: an empirical analysis using Landsat TM and ETM + data. Int J Remote Sens 27:3153–3181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peneva-Reed E (2014) Understanding land-cover change dynamics of a mangrove ecosystem at the village level in Krabi Province, Thailand, using Landsat data. GISCI Remote Sens 51:403–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petkova-Timmer V, Lockie S, Rolfe J, Ivanova G (2009) Mining developments and social impacts on communities: bowen basin case studies. Rural Soci 19:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prakash A, Gupta RP (1998) Land-use mapping and change detection in a coal mining area-a case study in the Jharia coalfield, India. Int J Remote Sens 19:391–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rawashdeh SA, Ruzouq R, Al-Fugara A, Pradhan B, Ziad SH, Ghayda AR (2013) Monitoring of Dead Sea water surface variation using multi-temporal satellite data and GIS. ARAB J Geosci 6:3241–3248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sheng F, Kuang D (2003) Remote sensing survey and research on the change of Qinghai Lake in recent 25years. Lake Sci 15:289–296 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shiraishi T, Motohka T, Thapa RB, Watanabe M, Shimada M (2014) Comparative assessment of supervised classifiers for land use—land cover classification in a tropical region using time-series palsar mosaic data. IEEE J Stars 7(4):1186–1199Google Scholar
  43. Sonter LJ, Barrett DJ, Soares-Filho BS, Moran CJ (2014a) Global demand for steel drives extensive land-use change in Brazil’s iron quadrangle. Glob Environ Change 26(1):63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sonter LJ, Moran CJ, Barrett DJ, Soares-Filho BS (2014b) Processes of land use change in mining regions. J Clean Prod 84(1):494–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stehman SV (2009) Sampling designs for accuracy assessment of land cover. Int J Remote Sens 30(20):5243–5272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stumpf A, Kerle N (2011) Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests. Remote Sens Environ 115:2564–2577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thapa RB, Itoh T, Shimada M, Watanabe M, Takeshi M, Shiraishi T (2014) Evaluation of ALOS PALSAR sensitivity for characterizing natural forest cover in wider tropical areas. Remote Sens Environ 155:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thenkabail PS, Enclona EA, Ashton MS, Legg C, Dedieu MJ (2004) Hyperion, IKONOS, ALI, and ETM + sensors in the study of African rainforests. Remote Sens Environ 90:23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Townsend PA, Helmers DP, Kingdon CC, Mcneil BE, Beurs KM, Eshleman KN (2009) Changes in the extent of surface mining and reclamation in the Central Appalachians detected using a 1976–2006 Landsat time series. Remote Sens Environ 113:62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Trimble (2013) eCognition Developer 8.9. User Guide. München: Trimble Germany GmbHGoogle Scholar
  51. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang W, Li S, Han J (2015) Analysis of the main global coal resource countries’ supply demand structural trend and coal industry outlook. China Min Mag 24(2):5–9 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  53. Wardlow BD, Egbert SL, Kastens JH (2007) Analysis of time-series MODIS 250 m vegetation index data for crop classification in the US Central Great Plains. Remote Sens Environ 108:290–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu H (2006) Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens 27:3025–3033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu H (2013) Rule-based impervious surface mapping using high spatial resolution imagery. Int J Remote Sens 34:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang X, Lo C (2002) Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. Int J Remote Sens 23:1775–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yu J, Zhao H, Wang Y, Xu J (2015) Evaluating land use type change and ecosystem services in Peixian County. Adv Mater Res 1065:2744–2748Google Scholar
  58. Zhao Y (2003) Principles and methods for remote sensing application and analysis. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhou W, Troy A (2008) An object-oriented approach for analysing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level. Int J Remote Sens 29:3119–3135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhou W, Huang G, Troy A, Cadenasso ML (2009) Object-based land cover classification of shaded areas in high spatial resolution imagery of urban areas: a comparison study. Remote Sens Environ 25:53–67Google Scholar
  61. Zhou C, Liu G, Wu D, Fang T, Wang R, Fan X (2014a) Mobility behavior and environmental implications of trace elements associated with coal gangue: a case study at the Huainan coalfield in china. Chemosphere 95:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou W, Cadenasso ML, Schwarz K, Pickett ST (2014b) Quantifying spatial heterogeneity in urban landscapes: integrating visual interpretation and object-based classification. Remote Sens 6:3369–3386CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenming Pei
    • 1
  • Suping Yao
    • 1
  • Joseph F. Knight
    • 2
  • Shaochun Dong
    • 3
  • Keith Pelletier
    • 2
  • Lian P. Rampi
    • 2
  • Yan Wang
    • 2
  • Jim Klassen
    • 2
  1. 1.MOE Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemistry, School of Earth Sciences and EngineeringNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  3. 3.School of Earth Sciences and EngineeringNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations