Surface passivation model explains pyrite oxidation kinetics in column experiments with up to 11 bars p(O2)

  • Marton BertaEmail author
  • Frank Dethlefsen
  • Markus Ebert
  • Karsten Gundske
  • Andreas Dahmke
Thematic Issue
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Subsurface Energy Storage


Despite decades of research in numerous experimental and field studies, the reaction kinetics of pyrite oxidation is still not characterized for high partial pressures of oxygen and near-neutral pH-levels. These conditions potentially exist in aquifers where oxidative site remediation, temporary water storage, or a leakage from a compressed air energy storage facility is present. For planning and monitoring of such field operations, their potential side effects on protected natural resources like groundwater have to be characterized. Thereby, site-scale assessments of such side effects of subsurface use by numerically modeling geochemical changes caused by the presence of oxygen need parametrization. Also, a function transferring results from simple, low pressure experiments to high pressure environments requires experimental bases. Pyrite oxidation can be the main consequence of oxygen intruding reduced aquifers. In this study, pyrite oxidation kinetics was examined at oxygen partial pressures from 0 to 11 bars, corresponding to an air intrusion in up to 500 m depth, at neutral pH-levels in high and low pressure flow-through column experiments representing aquifer conditions. A reaction rate equation was developed and evaluated with 1D PHREEQC numerical reactive transport models using experimental data as transfer function between high pressure and low pressure experiments. This model development included an improvement of established rate laws with a passivation term, which is, in contrast to previously published functions, dependent on the partial pressure of oxygen. The resulting model on passivated oxidation kinetics of pyrite at high oxygen partial pressures was able to reproduce independent experimental results acquired using different experimental set-ups. This assessment found the passivation to overcome the theoretical increase in pyrite oxidation kinetics caused by elevating oxygen partial pressure. These findings contribute to future experimental and modeling efforts for risk assessment and monitoring of oxygen-rich plumes in the subsurface.


Compressed air energy storage Pyrite oxidation kinetics Column experiments High pressure oxygen measurement Air in aquifer Surface passivation Air leakage ANGUS+ 



The project partners (Hilke Würdemann, Anke Westphal, and Tobias Lienen) at the German Research Center for Geosciences in Potsdam are acknowledged for the microbial analysis. Claus-Henning Solterbeck and Mohammed Es-Souni from the Institute for Materials and Surface Technology at the University of Applied Sciences Kiel have performed the Raman measurements, and Oliver Lischtschenko and Derek Guenther from OceanOptics GmbH advised us regarding optical oxygen measurement. Funding was provided by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for the ANGUS+ Project, Grant Number 03EK3022, and the authors would furtherly like to acknowledge the support of the Project Management Jülich (PTJ).


  1. Bauer S, Beyer C, Dethlefsen F, Dietrich P, Duttmann R, Ebert M, Dahmke A (2013) Impacts of the use of the geological subsurface for energy storage: an investigation concept. Environ Earth Sci 70(8):3935–3943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer S, Pfeiffer W, Boockmeyer A, Dahmke A, Beyer C (2015) Quantifying induced effects of subsurface renewable energy storage. Energy Proc 76:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckmann A, Gerhardt M, Zittwitz M, Martiensse M, Krieg R, Geistlinger H, Schirmer M (2007) Das OXYWALL-Projekt: Anwendung eines Verfahrens zur Direktgasinjektion von Sauerstoff zur in situ Sanierung von organisch kontaminierten Grundwässern. Altlasten Spektrum 4:153–159Google Scholar
  4. Blight K, Ralph DE, Thurgate S (2000) Pyrite surfaces after bio-leaching: a mechanism for bio-oxidation. Hydrometallurgy 58:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Courtin-Nomade A, Bril H, Bény J-M, Kunz M, Tamura N (2010) Sulfide oxidation observed using micro-Raman spectroscopy and micro-X-ray diffraction: the importance of water/rock ratios and pH conditions. Am Miner 95:582–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crotogino F, Mohmeyer KU, Scharf R (2001) Huntorf CAES: more than 20 years of successful operation. Spring 2001 Meeting Orlando, Florida, 15–18 Apr 2001Google Scholar
  7. Descourvières C, Hartog N, Patterson BM, Oldham C, Prommer H (2009) Geochemical controls on sediment reactivity and buffering processes in a heterogeneous aquifer. Appl Geochem 25:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gleisner M, Herbert RB Jr, Frogner Kockum PC (2006) Pyrite oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans at various concentrations of dissolved oxygen. Chem Geol 225:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haase C, Dahmke A, Ebert M, Schäfer D, Dethlefsen F (2014) Suitability of existing numerical model codes and thermodynamic databases for the prognosis of calcite dissolution processes in near-surface sediments due to a CO2 leakage investigated by column experiments. Aquatic Geochem 20:639–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammack RW, Watzlaf GR (1990) The effect of oxygen on pyrite oxidation. In: Mining and reclamation conference and exhibition, Charleston, 23–26 Apr 1990Google Scholar
  11. Huminicki DMC, Rimstidt JD (2009) Iron oxyhydroxide coating of pyrite for acid mine drainage control. Appl Geochem 24:1626–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jørgensen CJ, Jacobsen OS, Elberling B, Aamand J (2009) Microbial oxidation of pyrite coupled to nitrate reduction in anoxic groundwater sediment. Environ Sci Technol 43:4851–4857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koch S (2014) Experimental study on geochemical effects of methane leakages into groundwater. M.Sc.-Thesis at the Institute of Geosciences, Christian-Albrechts University KielGoogle Scholar
  14. Lefticariu L, Schimmelmann A, Pratt LM, Ripley EM (2007) Oxygen isotope partitioning during oxidation of pyrite by H2O2 and its dependence on temperature. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:5072–5088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lienen T, Westphal A, Würdemann H (2014) Mikrobiologische Parametrisierung und experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Verhalten von Mikroorganismen an geothermischen Anlagen (AP1.9). ANGUS + Meeting, Travemünde, 1–3 Sept 2014Google Scholar
  16. Long H, Dixon DG (2004) Pressure oxidation of pyrite in sulfuric acid media: a kinetic study. Hydrometallurgy 73:335–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCray JE (2010) Mathematical modeling of air sparging for subsurface remediation: state of the art. J Hazard Mater 72:237–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKibben MA, Barnes HL (1986) Oxidation of pyrite in low temperature acidic solutions: rate laws and surface textures. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 50:1509–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moses CO, Herman JS (1991) Pyrite oxidation at circumneutral pH. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nordstrom DK, McCleskey RB, Ball JW (2009) Sulfur geochemistry of hydrothermal waters in Yellowstone National Park: IV acid-sulfate waters. Appl Geochem 24:191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Papangelakis VG, Demopoulos GP (1991) Acid pressure oxidation of pyrite: reaction kinetics. Hydrometallurgy 26:309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2013) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3—a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. U.S. Geol Surv Tech Methods Book 6:497Google Scholar
  23. Pérez-López R, Cama J, Nieto JM, Ayora C, Saaltink MW (2009) Attenuation of pyrite oxidation with a fly ash pre-barrier: reactive transport modelling of column experiments. Appl Geochem 24:1712–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rimstidt JD, Vaughan DJ (2003) Pyrite oxidation: a state-of-the-art assessment of the reaction mechanism. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Safaei H, Keith DW, Hugo RJ (2013) Compressed air energy storage (CAES) with compressors distributed at heat loads to enable waste heat utilization. Appl Energy 103:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomson NR, Johnson RL (2010) Air distribution during in situ air sparging: an overview of mathematical modeling. J Hazard Mater 72:265–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tichomirowa M, Junghans M (2009) Oxygen isotope evidence for sorption of molecular oxygen to pyrite surface sites and incorporation into sulfate in oxidation experiments. Appl Geochem 24:2072–2092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Varekamp JC, Ouimette AP, Herman SW, Flynn KS, Bermudez A, Delpino D (2009) Naturally acid waters from Copahue volcano, Argentina. Appl Geochem 24:208–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Williamson MA, Rimstidt JD (1994) The kinetics and electrochemical rate determining step of aqueous pyrite oxidation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:5443–5454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhukov VV, Laari A, Koiranen T (2015) Kinetic modeling of high-pressure pyrite oxidation with parameter estimation and reliability analysis using the Markov chain monte carlo method. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:9920–9930CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeosciencesKiel UniversityKielGermany

Personalised recommendations