Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of the predicted vulnerability zones with the data based on hazard zones of landslide in the Kurseong hill subdivision, Darjeeling district, West Bengal, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kurseong hill subdivision, being one of the three (Kurseong, Sadar and Kalingpong) subdivisions of the hilly portions of the Darjeeling district, West Bengal, India, is affected by severe landslide incidence in the rainy season every year. These landslides and related phenomena frequently create social and economic instability disrupting communication system, claiming property and even sometimes life. Curbing landslide threat, therefore, becomes very much essential over this area. Individual landslide treatments are seen to be taken up by the construction engineers and geo-technical experts almost every year from government level. But reoccurrence of landslides on the same spots or surrounding places clearly reveals that construction works and filling procedures (usually taken up) are not the adequate measures to heal up the problem unless the area is treated as zones of landslides than individual spots of landslide occurrences. Therefore, the assessment of spatial probability of landslide occurrence in various magnitudes in the form of landslide vulnerability zones becomes essential. This spatial probability should also be compared with temporal probability based on the data of landslide incidence of the area for justification of match or mismatch between the inference drawn from the diagnostic criteria based assessment of the possibility level of landslide occurrence and the reality of the landslide scenario in the light of historical perspective of the area. This comparison will finally help to achieve the predicted vulnerability zones of landslide with desirable accuracy to put forward for planning decision. Moreover, such predicted vulnerability zonation can be taken as a standard estimate to use in planning purpose for the areas where historical data of landslide incidences are inadequate or unavailable. With this view in mind, the present paper takes an attempt to verify and compare landslide vulnerability zones derived from Spatial Terrain Parameter Evaluation (STPE) and Anthropogenic Criteria Identification (ACI) methods with the landslide hazard zones prepared from historical data, i.e. landslide inventory of certain length of time. Careful observation reveals that different degrees of landslide vulnerability zones significantly correspond with the similar magnitudes of the landslide hazard zones determined by past occurrence data of landslides over this hill subdivision and therefore validate the predictability procedure of landslide vulnerability zonation. The accuracy performance of the landslide vulnerability zonation model has further been verified by the occurrence dataset of landslide events through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis where area under curve evaluation showed 81.77 % correctness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Bathrellos GD, Kalivas DP, Skilodimou HD (2009) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping models applied to natural and urban planning in Trikala, Central Greece. Estud Geol 65(1):49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathrellos GD, Gaki-Papanastassiou K, Skilodimou HD, Papanastassiou D, Chousianitis KG (2012) Potential suitability for urban planning and industry development using natural hazard maps and geological–geomorphological parameters. Environ Earth Sci 66:537–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathrellos GD, Gaki-Papanastassiou K, Skilodimou HD, Skianis GA, Chousianitis KG (2013) Assessment of rural community and agricultural development using geomorphological–geological factors and GIS in the Trikala prefecture (Central Greece). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:573–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SK (1999) A constructive approach to landslides through susceptibility zoning and case study in the Rakti basin of the Eastern Himalaya. Trans Jpn Geomorphol Union Jpn 20(3):317–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SK (2002) Tindharia Cricket Colony landslide in Darjeeling hills—a comparative account, 1996 and 001. In: Basu S (ed) Hanging environmental scenario of the Indian subcontinent. ACB Publication, Calcutta, pp 400–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SK (2009) Effect of deforestation on rainfall and runoff over the Terai and adjacent Hills in the Darjeeling district, West Bengal, India. Geogr Rev India Kolkata 71(2):130–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SK (2011) A comparison between the climatic characteristics of the Terai plains and the adjacent hills in Darjeeling district, West Bengal, India. Geogr Thoughts N.B.U Siliguri 9:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SK (2012a) Zonation mapping techniques of the landslide hazard in Darjeeling Hills, West Bengal, India. Geo-Analyst 2(1):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SK (2012b) Landslide disaster perception of the AILA cyclone in the Darjeeling town, West Bengal, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 3(1):14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SK (2014) A calibration technique for better estimation of soil loss in the Terai and adjacent Hills of West Bengal, India. Res Forum Int J Soc Sci 2(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalkias C, Ferentinou M, Polykretis C (2014) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping on the Peloponnese Peninsula, Greece. Geosciences 4:176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois RA (1985) Natural hazards assessment of the coastal area of Saint Lucia. West Indies Organization of American States, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75:229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Stapledon D, Macgregor P (2012) Landslides and geologic environments. In: Clague JJ, Stead D (eds) Landslides—types, mechanisms and modelling. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 134–143

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S (2011) Knowledge guided empirical prediction of landslide hazard. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Twente, pp 7–9

  • Gokceoglu C, Aksoy H (1996) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques. Eng Geol 44:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gönen M (2006) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In: Proceedings of the thirty-first annual SAS® users group international conference. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, Paper 210-31: 1–18. http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi31/210-31.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016

  • Govt. of India (2009) National disaster management guidelines: management of landslides and snow avalanches. National Disaster Management Authority, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabs T, Seibert J, Bishop K, Laudon H (2009) Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: a comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. J Hydrol 373:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaboyedoff M, Couture R, Locat P (2009) Structural analysis of Turtle Mountain (Alberta) using digital elevation model: toward a progressive failure. Geomorphology 103:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY (2010) Erosion and sedimentation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2004) Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boun, Korea. Int J Remote Sens 25:2037–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao T, Hu D, Li X, Chen Y (2011) Landslide vulnerability evaluation: a case study from Sichuan, China. In: 19th International conference on geoinformatics, pp 1–4

  • Luan TX, Shibayama M, Cannata M, Long NH (2010) Area informatics and TRIGRS model for study shallow landslide vulnerability assessment. A case study in Bavi area, Hanoi region, Vietnam. In: International symposium on geoinformatics for spatial infrastructure development in Earth and Allied Sciences

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Gesseler PE, Nielsen GA, Peterson GA (1993) Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am 57:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay BP, Roy S, Chaudhuri S, Mitra S (2012) Influence of geological parameters on landslide vulnerability zonation of Darjeeling town, in Eastern Himalayas. Asian J Environ Disaster Manag 4(2):27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A et al (2008) Landslide hazard zonation using Remote Sensing and GIS: a case study of Dikrong river basin, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 54(15):17–1529

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulou-Vrynioti K, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD, Kaviris G, Makropoulos K (2013) Karst collapse susceptibility mapping using seismic hazard in a rapid urban growing area. Eng Geol 158:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Moezzi KD (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using a spatial multi criteria evaluation model at Haraz Watershed, Iran. In: Pradhan B, Buchroithner M (eds) Terrigenous mass movements: detection, modelling, early warning and mitigation using geoinformation technology, vol 8(2). Springer, Berlin, pp 23–49

  • Powde MB, Saha SS (1976) Geology of the Darjeeling Himalayas. In: Geological Survey of India miscellaneous publication, vol 41, pp 50–55

  • Rollerson T, Millard T, Thomson B (2002) Using terrain attributes to predict post-logging landslide likelihood on southwestern Vancouver Island. Forest Research Technical Report. TR-015 Geomorphology. Forest Service, BC, pp 1–15

  • Rozos D, Bathrellos GD, Skillodimou HD (2011) Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system and analytic hierarchy process methods, upon landslide susceptibility mapping, using GIS: a case study from the Eastern Achaia County of Peloponnesus, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 63:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozos D, Skilodimou HD, Loupasakis C, Bathrellos DG (2013) Application of the revised universal soil loss equation model on landslide prevention. An example from N. Euboea (Evia) Island, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 70:3255–3266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha AK, Gupta RP, Sarkar I, Arora MK, Csaplovics E (2005) An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation with a case study in the Himalayas. Landslides 2:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma LP, Debnath P, Patel N, Ghose MK (2009) Landslide vulnerability. http://mycoordinates.org/landslide-vulnerability/. Accessed Nov 2012

  • Sharma LP, Patel N, Ghose MK, Debnath P (2011) Landslide vulnerability assessment and zonation through ranking of causative parameters based on landslide density-derived statistical indicators. Geocarto Int 26(6):491–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SLUMDMP (2005) Landslide hazard zonation mapping and mitigation in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Urban Multi-hazard Disaster Mitigation Project pp 1–9. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/45777812/LANDSLIDE-HAZARD-ZONATION-MAPPING-AND-MITIGATION-IN-SRI-LANKA. Accessed Nov 2012

  • Van Westen CJ, Bonilla JBA (1990) Mountain hazard analysis using PC-based GIS. In: 6th IAEG Congress, vol 1. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 265–271

  • van Westen CJ, van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation-why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeşilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: comparison between logistic regression and neural networks in a medium scale study, Hendek region (TURKEY). Eng Geol 79(3–4):51–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Maerz NH (2013) Overview of some geological hazards in the Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 70(7):3115–3130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) plots. Clin Chem 39:561–577

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is a part of the Minor Research Project entitled ‘Landslide Vulnerability Zonation in the Kurseong Hill Subdivision of the Darjeeling district, West Bengal, India’ funded by University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India. Author seeks to express his sincere thanks and gratitude to UGC for providing such opportunity and financial assistance for this project. During field work and data collection, many personnel of various offices and unnamed local inhabitants extended their helping hands and cooperation. Author is highly grateful to all of them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudip Kumar Bhattacharya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharya, S.K. A comparison of the predicted vulnerability zones with the data based on hazard zones of landslide in the Kurseong hill subdivision, Darjeeling district, West Bengal, India. Environ Earth Sci 75, 923 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5729-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5729-8

Keywords