Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminant analysis for the prediction of sand mass distribution in a holding pond using deposition thickness model of a single grain-sized particle

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discriminant analysis (DA) was applied to derive the classification function to spatially determine the sand mass distribution in an urban stormwater holding pond, Malaysia, using simulated deposition thickness results of a single grain-sized particle (d50 = 0.375 mm). The upstream boundary lines at the inflow gates of the hydrodynamic model were fixed to three inflow parameter values, 16, 40 and 80 m3 s−1, representing the inflow variations of diverted floodwater into the holding pond during major storm events. The annual mean suspended sediment concentration of approximately 373 mg l−1 at the confluence of the Klang and Ampang Rivers was fixed as input parameter value for the sand deposition model. The simulated deposition thickness of the single grain-sized particle displays a significantly strong correlation with the measured sand mass content of the surface sediment samples at corresponding locations. The surface sediment sampling locations were hierarchically clustered into two groups based on the sand mass composition of the sediment samples. Group one comprises nine sampling locations representing areas of relatively higher sand mass composition ranging from 16.9 to 45.5 %. Group two comprises twenty sampling locations representing areas of relatively lower sand mass composition ranging from 3.7 to 12.2 %. DA was conducted to generate linear combination of the independent variables that will discriminate best between the objects in the groups. Two classification functions also known as Fisher’s linear discriminant functions, F 1 = −6.441 − 125.438 × A + 57.519 × B and F 2 = −1.248 − 53.442 × A + 24.424 × B, were produced to predict group memberships of relatively high and low sand mass composition areas, where A and B denote the simulated deposition thickness results of a single grain-sized particle computed at nodal points of the model domain, generated by an inflow magnitude of 16 and 40 m3 s−1, respectively. The classification of areas which comprises of relatively high and low sand mass composition is based on whichever group (F 1 or F 2) is related to the highest classification score. Classification result indicates that the model correctly predicts 66.7 and 100.0 % of the surface sediment sampling locations consisting of relatively high (group one) and low (group two) sand mass percentage, respectively. The predicted results of the sand mass distribution show that 23.6 % of the model domain area (25.20 m2) at the western bank region consists of a relatively higher sand mass content compared to the remaining 76.4 % comprising areas of lower sand mass content mostly situated at the central and south-eastern regions of the holding pond. The predicted sand mass distribution results can be used implicitly to spatially distinguish the most likely contaminated sediment areas and identify accurately sampling locations of polluted sediment for environmental impact assessment study prior conducting any dredging activities for future maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boulton AJ, Findlay S, Marmonier P, Stanley EH, Valett HM (1998) The functional significant of the hyporheic zone in streams and rivers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowes MJ, Leach DV, House WA (2005) Seasonal nutrient dynamics in a chalk stream: the River Frome, Dorset, UK. Sci Total Environ 336:225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David JW (1998) Modelling residence time in stormwater ponds. Ecol Eng 10:247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droppo IG, Liss SN, Williams D, Nelson T, Jaskot C, Trapp B (2009) Dynamic existence of waterborne pathogens within river sediment compartments: implications for water quality regulatory affairs. Environ Sci Technol 43:1737–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne M, Dewals BJ, Erpicum S, Archambeau P, Pirotton M (2010) Experimental investigation of flow pattern and sediment deposition in rectangular shallow reservoirs. Int J Sedim Res 25:258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant JL, Ivushkina T, MacLaughlin K, Lukacs H, Gawel J, Senn D, Hemond HF (2004) Elevated levels of arsenic in the sediments of an urban pond: sources, distribution and water quality impacts. Water Res 38:2989–3000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll). Introducing statistical methods. SAGE, London. ISBN 9781847879073

    Google Scholar 

  • Greb SR, Bannerman RT (1997) Influence of particle size on wet pond effectiveness. Water Environ Res 69:1134–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Haregeweyn N, Poesen J, Nyssen J, De Wit J, Haile M, Govers G, Deckers S (2006) Reservoirs in Tigray (Northern Ethiopia): characteristics and sediment deposition problems. Land Degrad Dev 17:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings AA (2003) Modeling sedimentation and scour in small urban lakes. Environ Model Softw 18:281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2002) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 5th edn. Pearson Education, New Jersey, p 690

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamalakkannan R, Zettel V, Goubatchev A, Stead-Dexter K, Ward NI (2004) Chemical (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and heavy metal) levels in contaminated stormwater and sediments from a motorway dry detention pond drainage system. J Environ Monit 6:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King IP (2005a) RMAGEN. A program for generation of finite element networks. Version 7.3d. Resource Modelling Associates, Sydney, Australia

  • King IP (2005b) RMA-2. A two dimensional finite element model for flow estuaries and streams. Version 4.3b. Resource Modelling Associates, Sydney, Australia

  • King IP (2005c) RMA-11. A three dimensional finite element model for water quality in estuaries and streams. Version 4.3b. Resource Modelling Associates, Sydney, Australia, pp 3.17–3.18

  • Krishnappan BG, Marsalek J (2002) Transport characteristics of fine sediments from an on-stream stormwater management pond. Urban Water 4:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J (1996) Turbidity-controlled suspended sediment sampling for runoff-event load estimation. Water Resour Res 32:2299–2310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma SN, Rainbow PS (2008) Metal contamination in aquatic environments: science and lateral management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsalek P, Marsalek J (1997) Characteristics of sediment from a stormwater management pond. Water Sci Technol 36:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsalek J, Krishnappan BG, Watt WE, Anderson BC (1998) Size distribution of suspended sediment in an on-stream stormwater management pond. Proceeding 3rd international conference. Innovative technologies in an urban storm drainage, Lyon, France, pp 543–550

  • Marsalek J, Rochfort Q, Brownlee B, Mayer T, Servos M (1999) An exploratory study of urban runoff toxicity. Water Sci Technol 39:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsalek J, Anderson BC, Watt WE (2002) Suspended particulate in urban stormwater ponds: physical, chemical and toxicological characteristics. Global solutions for urban drainage. In: 9th International conference on urban drainage, Portland, Oregon, United States

  • Massart DL, Kaufman L (1983) The interpretation of analytical data by the use of cluster analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery RL, Thackston EL, Parker FL (1983) Dredged material sedimentation basin design. J Environ Eng ASCE 109:466–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packman AI, Salehin M (2003) Relative roles of stream flow and sedimentary conditions in controlling hyporheic exchange. Hydrobiologia 494:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagoulia D, Dimou G (1996) Sensitivities of groundwater streamflow interaction to global climate change. Hydrol Sci J 41:781–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson T (2002) Characteristics of suspended particles in a small stormwater pond. Global solutions for urban drainage. In: 9th international conference on urban drainage, Portland, Oregon, United States, pp 1–12 doi: 10.1061/40644(2002)25

  • Raykov T, Marcoulides GA (2008) An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. Taylor and Francis Group. New York, pp 332–333

  • Rieker K (2006) Construction of a combined stormwater management and road tunnel in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21:360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansalone JJ, Buchberger SG (1997) Characteristic of solid and metal element distribution in urban highway stormwater. Water Sci Technol 36:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes L, Shutes RBE, Revitt DM, Forshaw M, Purchase D (1998) The treatment of metals in urban runoff by constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 214:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinowski W, Auerswald K (1999) Using relief parameters in a discriminant analysis to stratify geological areas with different spatial variability of soil properties. Geoderma 89:113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer KL, Droppo IG, He C, Grapentine L, Exall K (2011) A novel tracer technique for the assessment of fine sediment dynamics in urban water management systems. Water Res 45:2595–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takamatsu M, Barrett M, Charbeneau RJ (2010) Hydraulic model for sedimentation in storm-water detention basins. J Environ Eng 136:527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamayol A, Firoozabadi B, Ashjari MA (2010) Hydrodynamics of secondary settling tanks and increasing their performance using baffles. J Environ Eng 136:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarela PA, Menéndez AN (1999) A model to predict reservoir sedimentation. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 4:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier G, Rochfort Q, Grapentine L, Marsalek J, Lafont M (2012) Spatial and seasonal toxicity in a stormwater management facility: evidence obtained by adapting an integrated sediment quality assessment approach. Water Res 46:6671–6682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijn LC (2007) Principles of sediment transport in rivers, estuaries, and coastal seas. Aqua, Blokzijl, www.aquapublications.nl

  • Verstraeten G, Poesen J (2001) Variability of dry sediment bulk density between and within retention ponds and its impact on the calculation of sediment yields. Earth Surf Proc Land 26:375–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein JE, Crawford KD, Garner TR (2010) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in stormwater detention pond sediments in coastal South Carolina. Environ Monit Assess 162:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef YA, Hvitved-Jacobsen T, Sloat J, Lindeman W (1994a) Sediment accumulation in detention or retention ponds. Sci Total Environ 146(147):451–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef YA, Lin L, Linderman W, Hvitved-Jacobsen T (1994b) Transport of heavy metals through accumulated sediments in wet ponds. Sci Total Environ 146(147):485–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarris D, Vlastara M, Panagoulia D (2011) Sediment delivery assessment for a transboundary Mediterranean catchment: the example of Nestos River catchment. Water Resour Manage 25:3785–3803

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Drainage and Irrigation Department of Malaysia and SMART Control Centre for their support in this project. They would also like to express their gratitude to Kamaruzaman Mamat, Rohaimah Demanah, Lakam Mejus, Juhari Mohd. Yusof, Mod. Omar and Saiful Anuar Tajol Aripin for their assistance in the field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Andy Dominic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dominic, J.A., Aris, A.Z., Sulaiman, W.N.A. et al. Discriminant analysis for the prediction of sand mass distribution in a holding pond using deposition thickness model of a single grain-sized particle. Environ Earth Sci 75, 812 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5641-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5641-2

Keywords

Navigation