Environmental pollution and its effect on water sources from marble quarries in western Turkey

  • Mehmet Ozcelik
Original Article


Turkey is located in one of the oldest marble-producing areas in the world, with 4000 years of natural stone production, which started at Marmara Island. With over 80 types and 400 different colors and patterns, Turkey has one of the world’s largest natural stone reserves. Bursa and Isparta comprise the most significant regions of marble production in Turkey. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of pollution on water resources that might be generated in marble quarries in Turkey. Measured concentrations are compared to the standards established in the Turkish Environmental Laws Controlling Environmental Protection (TELCEP) for the rock quarry industry. Water quality was assessed at four quarries: Dagakcakoy, Armutlu, Akdogan, and Candır. Water quality data were divided into two periods: before quarry operations began (2000) and during the operational period (2013). Site investigations and water quality data have indicated that in terms of water and land resources, natural stone waste may be a source of contamination as a result of inadequate solid and liquid waste disposal. Based on the water quality data, marble quarry activity is shown to be an environmental concern for the following pollutants: organic pollutants, inorganic pollutants, suspended solids, and nutrients.


Marble quarries Environmental protection Pollution Water quality Waste water 



I am very grateful for the assistance with data requirements, particularly spatial data, provided by personnel at the General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works. I express also my thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which have helped to improve this manuscript.


  1. Akbulut H, Gurer C (2003) The environmental effects of waste marble and possibilities of utilization and waste minimization by using in the road layers. In: Proceedings of the fourth national marble symposium, Afyonkarahisar, pp 371–378 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  2. Alkan U, Teksoy A, Baskaya HS (2006) Yüzeysel sulardaki dogal organik maddelerin gideriminde uygun koagülasyon şartlarının belirlenmesi. Ekoloji Dergisi 15:18–26 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  3. Aukour FJ, Al-Qinna MI (2008) Marble production and environmental constrains: case study from Zarqa Governorate, Jordan. Jordan J Earth Environ Sci 1(1):11–21 (ISSN 1995–6681) Google Scholar
  4. Aydinalp C, FitzPatrick EA, Cresser MS (2005) Heavy metal pollution in some soil and water resources of Bursa Province, Turkey. Comm Soil Sci Plant Analy 36:1691–1716. doi: 10.1081/CSS-200062425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonifazi G, Cutaia L, Massacci P, Roselli I (2003) Monitoring of abandoned quarries by remote sensing and in situ surveying. Ecol Model 170:213–218. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00228-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BUSKI (2013) Water quality and quantity characteristics of the Dogancı Dam Lake. Bursa Metropolitan Municipality, BUSKI Report No 12, p 105 (Unpublished, in Turkish)Google Scholar
  7. Canik B, Pasvanoglu S (2002) Orhangazi ovası (Bursa) dolayındaki su kaynaklarının hidrojeokimyasal yönden incelenmesi. Hidrojeolojide izotop tekniklerinin kullanılması sempozyumu, DSI, TAKK Dairesi Başkanlığı, Adana, 173–188 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  8. Celik MY, Sabah E (2008) Geological and technical characterisation of Iscehisar (Afyon-Turkey) marble deposits and the impact of marble waste on environmental pollution. J Environ Manag 87:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Degirmenci M, Gunay G (1992) Analysis of hydrologic relations between Egirdir-Beysehir-Sugla lakes system and adjacent basins by means of remote sensing techniques (Southern Turkey). Environ Geol Water Sci 19(1):41–45. doi: 10.1007/BF01740576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dere S, Dalkıran N, Karacaoglu D, Elmacı A, Dulger B, Senturk E (2006) Relationships among epipelic diatom taxa, bacterial abundances and water quality in a highly polluted stream catchment, Bursa-Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 12:1–22. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-0213-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duque M, Pedraza J, Dıez A, Sanz MA, Carrasco RM (1998) A geomorphological design for the rehabilitation of an abandoned sand quarry in central Spain. Landsc Urban Plann 42:1–14 (ISSN 0169–2046) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ece (2013) Ece Mermer San. Tic. Ltd. Candır (Sutculer-Isparta) mermer ocaği kapasite artişi nihai çed raporu, Isparta, pp 96 (in Turkish, unpublished)Google Scholar
  13. Ekinciler (2013) Ekinciler Mermer San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. Armutlu (Sarkikaraagac-Isparta) mermer ocaği çed raporu, Denizli, pp 80 (in Turkish, unpublished)Google Scholar
  14. Ekmekci M (2003) Review of Turkish karst with emphasis on tectonic and paleogeographic controls. Acta Carsologica 17:205–218Google Scholar
  15. European Union (2006) Directive 2006/21/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the prevention of water status deterioration, air and soil pollutionGoogle Scholar
  16. European Union (2011) Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environmentGoogle Scholar
  17. Gazi A, Skevis G, Founti MA (2012) Energy efficiency and environmental assessment of typical marble quarry and processing plant. J Cleaner Produc 32:10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guyer GT, Ilhan EG (2011) Assessment of pollution profile in Buyukcekmece watershed, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 173:211–220. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1382-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Langer WH (2001) Potential environmental impacts of Quarrying Stone in Karst—a literature Review. US Geological Survey Open-File Report OF-01-0484Google Scholar
  20. Liguori V, Rizzo G, Traverso M (2008) Marble quarrying: an energy and waste intensive activity in the production of building materials. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 108:197–207. doi: 10.2495/EEIA080201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milisa M, Zivkovic V, Habdija I (2010) Destructive effect of quarry effluent on life in a mountain stream. Biologia 65(3):520–526. doi: 10.2478/s11756-010-0044-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nas B, Karabork H, Ekercin S, Berktay A (2008) Assessing water quality in the Beysehir Lake (Turkey) by the application of GIS, Geostatics and remote sensing. In: Sengupta M, Dalwani R (eds) Proceedings of Taal 2007: the 12th World Lake conference, pp 639–646Google Scholar
  23. Nima (2013) Nima Madencilik San.Dış Tic. A.Ş. Bursa Emprador mermer ocaği kapasite artişi nihai çed raporu, Bursa, pp 125 (in Turkish, unpublished)Google Scholar
  24. Republic of Turkey (2006) EU Integrated Environmental Approximation Strategy-UCES (2007–2023), Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Ankara. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  25. Sipahi MH (1985) Karst hydrogeology of the Aksu River Basin, Antalya. Karst Water Resources (Proceedings of the Ankara–Antalya Symposium, July 1985). IAHS Publ. no. 161:417–430Google Scholar
  26. SRK (2013) SRK Madencilik San. Dış Tic. A. Ş. Akdogan (Egirdir-Isparta) mermer ocaği kapasite artişi nihai çed raporu, Isparta, pp 102 (in Turkish, unpublished)Google Scholar
  27. Turkish Mining Law (2010) Mining law amendment and on some laws in law on making, Official Gazete Law No. 5995 Acceptance date: 06/10/2010, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  28. Turkish Water Pollution Control Regulations (TWPCR) (2004) Ministry of Environment and Forestry of Turkey, Official Gazette No. 25687, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang CY, Clausen R (2002) Marble cutting with single point cutting tool and diamond segments. Int J Mach Tools Manufac 42:1045–1054. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00032-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringSuleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey

Personalised recommendations