Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of phytoremediation on concentrations of benzene, toluene, naphthalene, and dissolved oxygen in groundwater at a former manufactured gas plant site, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, 1998–2014

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concentrations of benzene, toluene, naphthalene, and dissolved oxygen in groundwater at a former manufactured gas plant site near Charleston, South Carolina, USA, have been monitored since the installation of a phytoremediation system of hybrid poplar trees in 1998. Between 2000 and 2014, the concentrations of benzene, toluene, and naphthalene (BT&N) in groundwater in the planted area have decreased. For example, in the monitoring well containing the highest concentrations of BT&N, benzene concentrations decreased from 10,200 µg/L to less than 4000 µg/L, toluene concentrations decreased from 2420 µg/L to less than 20 µg/L, and naphthalene concentrations decreased from 6840 µg/L to less than 3000 µg/L. Concentrations of BT&N in groundwater in all wells were observed to be lower during the summer months relative to the winter months of a particular year during the first few years after installing the phytoremediation system, most likely due to increased transpiration and contaminant uptake by the hybrid poplar trees during the warm summer months; this pathway of uptake by trees was confirmed by the detection of benzene, toluene, and naphthalene in trees during sampling events in 2002, and later in the study in 2012. These data suggest that the phytoremediation system affects the groundwater contaminants on a seasonal basis and, over multiple years, has resulted in a cumulative decrease in dissolved-phase contaminant concentrations in groundwater. The removal of dissolved organic contaminants from the aquifer has resulted in a lower demand on dissolved oxygen supplied by recharge and, as a result, the redox status of the groundwater has changed from anoxic to oxic conditions. This study provides much needed information for water managers and other scientists on the viability of the long-term effectiveness of phytoremediation in decreasing groundwater contaminants and increasing dissolved oxygen at sites contaminated by benzene, toluene, and naphthalene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amplified Geochemical Imaging, LLC (2016) For environmental site assessment and monitoring. https://www.agisurveys.net/uploads/AGI_enviro_brochure_lr_rev_sj.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2015

  • Campbell BG, Petkewich MD, Landmeyer JE, Chapelle FH (1996) Geology, hydrogeology, and potential of intrinsic bioremediation at the NPS Dockside II site and adjacent areas, Charleston, SC, 1993–94. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4170

  • Cofield N, Schwab AP, Banks ML (2007) Phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil–part 1. Dissipation of target contaminants. Int J Phytoremediation 9(5):355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinicola RS, Cox SE, Landmeyer JE, Bradley PM (2002) Natural attenuation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds in ground water at operable Unit 1, Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division Keyport, Washington: US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4119

  • Doucette WJ, Bugbee B, Hayhurst S, Plaehn WA, Downey SA, Taffinder SA, Edwards SA (1998) Phytoremediation of dissolved-phase trichloroethylene using mature vegetation. In: Wickramanayake GB, Hinchee RE (eds) Bioremediation and phytoremediation, chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp 251–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberts SM, Schalk CW, Vose J, Harvey GJ (1999) Hydrologic effects of cottonwood trees on a shallow aquifer containing trichloroethene. Hydrol Sci Technol 15:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberts S, Harvey G, Jones S, Beckman S (2003) Multiple process assessment for a chlorinated-solvent plume. In: McCutcheon S, Schnoor J (eds) Phytoremediation transformation and control of contaminants. John Wiley and Sons Inc, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberts SM, Jones SA, Braun CL, Harvey GJ (2005) Long-term changes in groundwater chemistry at a phytoremediation demonstration site. Groundwater 43:178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forget E, Zayed J (1995) Tree-ring analysis for monitoring pollution by metals. In: Lewis TE (ed) Tree rings as indicators of ecosystem health. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh S, Compton H, Haroski H, Wrobel J, Schneider W (2003) Five-Year Pilot Study: Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. In: McCutcheon S, Schnoor J (eds) Phytoremediation transformation and control of contaminants. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer JE (2001) Monitoring the effect of poplar trees on petroleum-hydrocarbon and chlorinated-solvent contaminated ground water. Int J Phytoremediation 3:61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer JE (2011) Introduction to phytoremediation of contaminated groundwater. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer JE, Bradley PM (2003) Effect of hydrologic and geochemical conditions on oxygen-enhanced bioremediation in a gasoline-contaminated aquifer. Bioremediation J 7(3–4):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer JE, Chapelle FH, Petkewich MD, Bradley PM (1998) Assessment of natural attenuation of aromatic hydrocarbons in ground water near a former manufactured gas plant, South Carolina, USA. Environ Geol 34:279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer JE, Vroblesky DA, Bradley PM (2000) MTBE and BTEX in trees above gasoline-contaminated ground water In: Wickramanayake GB, Gavaskar AR, Gibbs JT, Means JL (eds) Case studies in the remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds. The second international conference on remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds, Monterey, California, May 22–25, 2000, pp 17–24

  • Marr LC, Booth EC, Andersen RG, Widdowson MA, Novak JT (2006) Direct volatilization of naphthalene to the atmosphere at a phytoremediation site. Environ Sci Technol 40:5560–5566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quander J (2011) Phytotechology project profiles. https://clu-in.org/products/phyto/. Accessed 1 Sept 2015

  • Schilling KE, Jacobson P (2015) Field observations of diurnal dissolved oxygen fluctuations in shallow groundwater. Groundwater 53(3):493–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spriggs T, Banks MK, Schwab P (2005) Phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in manufactured gas plant-impacted soil. J Environ Qual 34(5):1755–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Environmental technology verification report, soil gas sampling technology. EPA/600/R-98/095, p 69

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Phytoremediation resource guide. EPA 542-B-99-003, p 56

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2000a) Introduction to phytoremediation. EPA/600/R-99/107, p 105

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2000b) J-Field phytoremediation project field events and activities through July 31, 2000 Aberdeen Proving Ground, Edgewood, Maryland, August 31, 2000, p 28

  • US Geological Survey (variously dated) National field manual for the collection of water-quality data: US Geological Survey Techniques of water-resources investigations, Book 9, chaps. A1–A9. http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A

  • Van Den Bos A (2002) Phytoremediation of volatile organic compounds in groundwater: case studies in plume control. Report prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency Technology Innovation Office under a National Network for Environmental Management Studies Fellowship

  • Vroblesky DA, Nietch CT, Morris JT (1999) Chlorinated ethenes from groundwater in tree trunks. Environ Sci Technol 33:510–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weishaar JA, Tsao D, Burken JG (2009) Phytoremediation of BTEX hydrocarbons: potential impacts of diurnal groundwater fluctuation on microbial degradation. Int J Phytoremediation 11(5):509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdowson MA, Shearer S, Andersen RG, Novak JT (2005) Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in groundwater using poplar trees. Environ Sci Technol 39:1598–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Landmeyer.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Landmeyer, J.E., Effinger, T.N. Effect of phytoremediation on concentrations of benzene, toluene, naphthalene, and dissolved oxygen in groundwater at a former manufactured gas plant site, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, 1998–2014. Environ Earth Sci 75, 605 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5408-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5408-9

Keywords