Abstract
Concentrations of benzene, toluene, naphthalene, and dissolved oxygen in groundwater at a former manufactured gas plant site near Charleston, South Carolina, USA, have been monitored since the installation of a phytoremediation system of hybrid poplar trees in 1998. Between 2000 and 2014, the concentrations of benzene, toluene, and naphthalene (BT&N) in groundwater in the planted area have decreased. For example, in the monitoring well containing the highest concentrations of BT&N, benzene concentrations decreased from 10,200 µg/L to less than 4000 µg/L, toluene concentrations decreased from 2420 µg/L to less than 20 µg/L, and naphthalene concentrations decreased from 6840 µg/L to less than 3000 µg/L. Concentrations of BT&N in groundwater in all wells were observed to be lower during the summer months relative to the winter months of a particular year during the first few years after installing the phytoremediation system, most likely due to increased transpiration and contaminant uptake by the hybrid poplar trees during the warm summer months; this pathway of uptake by trees was confirmed by the detection of benzene, toluene, and naphthalene in trees during sampling events in 2002, and later in the study in 2012. These data suggest that the phytoremediation system affects the groundwater contaminants on a seasonal basis and, over multiple years, has resulted in a cumulative decrease in dissolved-phase contaminant concentrations in groundwater. The removal of dissolved organic contaminants from the aquifer has resulted in a lower demand on dissolved oxygen supplied by recharge and, as a result, the redox status of the groundwater has changed from anoxic to oxic conditions. This study provides much needed information for water managers and other scientists on the viability of the long-term effectiveness of phytoremediation in decreasing groundwater contaminants and increasing dissolved oxygen at sites contaminated by benzene, toluene, and naphthalene.






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amplified Geochemical Imaging, LLC (2016) For environmental site assessment and monitoring. https://www.agisurveys.net/uploads/AGI_enviro_brochure_lr_rev_sj.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2015
Campbell BG, Petkewich MD, Landmeyer JE, Chapelle FH (1996) Geology, hydrogeology, and potential of intrinsic bioremediation at the NPS Dockside II site and adjacent areas, Charleston, SC, 1993–94. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4170
Cofield N, Schwab AP, Banks ML (2007) Phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil–part 1. Dissipation of target contaminants. Int J Phytoremediation 9(5):355–370
Dinicola RS, Cox SE, Landmeyer JE, Bradley PM (2002) Natural attenuation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds in ground water at operable Unit 1, Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division Keyport, Washington: US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4119
Doucette WJ, Bugbee B, Hayhurst S, Plaehn WA, Downey SA, Taffinder SA, Edwards SA (1998) Phytoremediation of dissolved-phase trichloroethylene using mature vegetation. In: Wickramanayake GB, Hinchee RE (eds) Bioremediation and phytoremediation, chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp 251–256
Eberts SM, Schalk CW, Vose J, Harvey GJ (1999) Hydrologic effects of cottonwood trees on a shallow aquifer containing trichloroethene. Hydrol Sci Technol 15:115–121
Eberts S, Harvey G, Jones S, Beckman S (2003) Multiple process assessment for a chlorinated-solvent plume. In: McCutcheon S, Schnoor J (eds) Phytoremediation transformation and control of contaminants. John Wiley and Sons Inc, Boca Raton
Eberts SM, Jones SA, Braun CL, Harvey GJ (2005) Long-term changes in groundwater chemistry at a phytoremediation demonstration site. Groundwater 43:178–186
Forget E, Zayed J (1995) Tree-ring analysis for monitoring pollution by metals. In: Lewis TE (ed) Tree rings as indicators of ecosystem health. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 157–176
Hirsh S, Compton H, Haroski H, Wrobel J, Schneider W (2003) Five-Year Pilot Study: Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. In: McCutcheon S, Schnoor J (eds) Phytoremediation transformation and control of contaminants. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York
Landmeyer JE (2001) Monitoring the effect of poplar trees on petroleum-hydrocarbon and chlorinated-solvent contaminated ground water. Int J Phytoremediation 3:61–85
Landmeyer JE (2011) Introduction to phytoremediation of contaminated groundwater. Springer, Berlin
Landmeyer JE, Bradley PM (2003) Effect of hydrologic and geochemical conditions on oxygen-enhanced bioremediation in a gasoline-contaminated aquifer. Bioremediation J 7(3–4):165–177
Landmeyer JE, Chapelle FH, Petkewich MD, Bradley PM (1998) Assessment of natural attenuation of aromatic hydrocarbons in ground water near a former manufactured gas plant, South Carolina, USA. Environ Geol 34:279–292
Landmeyer JE, Vroblesky DA, Bradley PM (2000) MTBE and BTEX in trees above gasoline-contaminated ground water In: Wickramanayake GB, Gavaskar AR, Gibbs JT, Means JL (eds) Case studies in the remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds. The second international conference on remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds, Monterey, California, May 22–25, 2000, pp 17–24
Marr LC, Booth EC, Andersen RG, Widdowson MA, Novak JT (2006) Direct volatilization of naphthalene to the atmosphere at a phytoremediation site. Environ Sci Technol 40:5560–5566
Quander J (2011) Phytotechology project profiles. https://clu-in.org/products/phyto/. Accessed 1 Sept 2015
Schilling KE, Jacobson P (2015) Field observations of diurnal dissolved oxygen fluctuations in shallow groundwater. Groundwater 53(3):493–497
Spriggs T, Banks MK, Schwab P (2005) Phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in manufactured gas plant-impacted soil. J Environ Qual 34(5):1755–1762
US Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Environmental technology verification report, soil gas sampling technology. EPA/600/R-98/095, p 69
US Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Phytoremediation resource guide. EPA 542-B-99-003, p 56
US Environmental Protection Agency (2000a) Introduction to phytoremediation. EPA/600/R-99/107, p 105
US Environmental Protection Agency (2000b) J-Field phytoremediation project field events and activities through July 31, 2000 Aberdeen Proving Ground, Edgewood, Maryland, August 31, 2000, p 28
US Geological Survey (variously dated) National field manual for the collection of water-quality data: US Geological Survey Techniques of water-resources investigations, Book 9, chaps. A1–A9. http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A
Van Den Bos A (2002) Phytoremediation of volatile organic compounds in groundwater: case studies in plume control. Report prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency Technology Innovation Office under a National Network for Environmental Management Studies Fellowship
Vroblesky DA, Nietch CT, Morris JT (1999) Chlorinated ethenes from groundwater in tree trunks. Environ Sci Technol 33:510–515
Weishaar JA, Tsao D, Burken JG (2009) Phytoremediation of BTEX hydrocarbons: potential impacts of diurnal groundwater fluctuation on microbial degradation. Int J Phytoremediation 11(5):509–523
Widdowson MA, Shearer S, Andersen RG, Novak JT (2005) Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in groundwater using poplar trees. Environ Sci Technol 39:1598–1605
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Landmeyer, J.E., Effinger, T.N. Effect of phytoremediation on concentrations of benzene, toluene, naphthalene, and dissolved oxygen in groundwater at a former manufactured gas plant site, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, 1998–2014. Environ Earth Sci 75, 605 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5408-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5408-9


