Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Effects of land-use intensity on ecosystem services and human well-being: a case study in Huailai County, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of land-use intensity (LUI) on ecosystem services and human well-being in a rural county of China. LUI was assessed using the landscape development intensity index, key ecosystem services (crop production, soil conservation and climate regulation) and human well-being (standard of living and food security), which were quantified by proxy indicators. In addition, correlation method and ANOVA were used to reveal the effect of LUI on ecosystem services and human well-being. These results showed that LUI was correlated with changes in ecosystem services and human well-being in the study area. As LUI increased, there were increases in crop production and living standard well-being and a reduction in regulating services (soil conservation and climate regulation). The statistical results between LUI and food security were not significant. Furthermore, there were tradeoffs between provisioning and regulating services and synergies between regulating services when the LUI increased. These findings revealed the different responses of ecosystem services and human well-being to increasing LUI and provided guidelines for land-use decision-making and ecosystem services management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Ayanu YZ, Conrad C, Nauss T, Wegmann M, Koellner T (2012) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: a review of remote sensing applications. Environ Sci Technol 46:8529–8541. doi:10.1021/es300157u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrachina M, Cristobal J, Tulla AF (2015) Estimating above-ground biomass on mountain meadows and pastures through remote sensing. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 38:184–192. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2014.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Vivas MB (2005) Landscape development intensity index. Environ Monit Assess 101:289–309. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-0296-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MJ, Carstenn S, Lane CR (2004) Floristic quality indices for biotic assessment of depressional marsh condition in Florida. Ecol Appl 14:784–794. doi:10.1890/02-5378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, Pomeroy R (2011) Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ Conserv 38:370–379. doi:10.1017/s0376892911000506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Rosa D, Moreno J, Mayol F, Bonson T (2000) Assessment of soil erosion vulnerability in western Europe and potential impact on crop productivity due to loss of soil depth using the ImpelERO model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 81:179–190. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00161-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraiappah AK (2011) Ecosystem services and human well-being: do global findings make any sense? Bioscience 61:7–8. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, Van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:135–140. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Goulder LH (2007) Is current consumption excessive? A general framework and some indications for the United States. Conserv Biol 21:1145–1154. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007-00779.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erb KH et al (2013) A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:464–470. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng J (2014) A spatial development study of Hebei towns suround Beijing based on the background of integration of Beijing–Ttianjin–Hebei: a case study of Hebei Dachang. Urban Dev Stud 21:16–20 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank S, Fuerst C, Koschke L, Makeschin F (2012) A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecol Ind 21:30–38. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huailai Statistic Bureau (2010) Huailai statistics yearbook of social and economic. Huailai Statistic Bureau, Huailai

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia XQ, Fu BJ, Feng XM, Hou GH, Liu Y, Wang XF (2014) The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China. Ecol Ind 43:103–113. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YC, Ahern J, Yeh CT (2015) Ecosystem services in pen-urban landscapes: the effects of agricultural landscape change on ecosystem services in Taiwan’s western coastal plain. Landsc Urban Plan 139:137–148. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou AR (2003) Relationship between climate changes over 30 years and sand storm at HuaiLai basin. J Bejing Norm Univ 39:531–536 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Zhou XS, Zhang J, Cui WY, Zhang Y (2013) Study the phytoplankton diversity and community changes in recent years at Guanting reservoir. Haihe Water Resour 1:19–22. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7328.2013.01.007 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack JJ (2006) Landscape as a predictor of wetland condition: an evaluation of the landscape development index (LDI) with a large reference wetland dataset from Ohio. Environ Monit Assess 120:221–241. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9058-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margriter SC, Bruland GL, Kudray GM, Lepczyk CA (2014) Using indicators of land-use development intensity to assess the condition of coastal wetlands in Hawai’i. Landsc Ecol 29:517–528. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9985-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivaton. Psychol Rev 50:370–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men MX, Zhao TK, Peng ZP, Yu ZR (2004) Study on the soil erodibility based on the soil particle-size distribution in Hebei province. Sci Agric Sin 37:1647–1653 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Midmore DJ, Jansen HGP, Dumsday RG (1996) Soil erosion and environmental impact of vegetable production in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 60:29–46. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(96)01065-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemela J, Saarela SR, Soderman T, Kopperoinen L, Yli-Pelkonen V, Vare S, Kotze DJ (2010) Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodivers Conserv 19:3225–3243. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1995) Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco FAL, Varandas SGP, Sanches Fernandes LF, Valle Junior RF (2014) Soil losses in rural watersheds with environmental land use conflicts. Sci Total Environ 485:110–120. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira E, Queiroz C, Pereira HM, Vicente L (2005) Ecosystem services and human well-being: a participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecol Soc 10:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto R, De Jonge VN, Marques JC (2014) Linking biodiversity indicators, ecosystem functioning, provision of services and human well-being in estuarine systems: application of a conceptual framework. Ecol Ind 36:644–655. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010a) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C et al (2010b) Untangling the environmentalist’s paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? Bioscience 60:576–589. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez JP et al (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11:28

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Loinaz G, Alday JG, Onaindia M (2015) Multiple ecosystem services landscape index: a tool for multifunctional landscapes conservation. J Environ Manag 147:152–163. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simelton E, Fraser EDG, Termansen M, Forster PM, Dougill AJ (2009) Typologies of crop-drought vulnerability: an empirical analysis of the socio-economic factors that influence the sensitivity and resilience to drought of three major food crops in China (1961–2001). Environ Sci Policy 12:438–452. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons NK, Gossner MM, Lewinsohn TM, Lange M, Tuerke M, Weisser WW (2015) Effects of land-use intensity on arthropod species abundance distributions in grasslands. J Anim Ecol 84:143–154. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiertz H (2013) Challenges for crop production research in improving land use, productivity and sustainability. Sustainability 5:1632–1644. doi:10.3390/su5041632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow BM, Sang JK, Nyabenge M, Bundotich DK, Duraiappah AK, Yatich TB (2009) Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the Lake Victoria basin of East Africa. Environ Sci Policy 12:504–519. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao FL, Yokozawa M, Xu YL, Hayashi Y, Zhang Z (2006) Climate changes and trends in phenology and yields of field crops in China, 1981–2000. Agric For Meteorol 138:82–92. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valtanen M, Sillanpaa N, Setala H (2014) Effects of land use intensity on stormwater runoff and its temporal occurrence in cold climates. Hydrol Process 28:2639–2650. doi:10.1002/hyp.9819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Tang HP (2015) Characteristics and impacts of climate change in huailai basin during the past 60 years. J Bejing Norm Univ 51:293–298 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang LL, Mao RZ, Li HJ (2004) Discussion on patterns and techniques of optimum utilization of water and land in Huailai County. Res Soil Water Conserv 11:27–30 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Li S, Peng W, Yu B (2004) Erodibility of agricultural soils on the Loess Plateau of China. Soil Tillage Res 76:157–165. doi:10.1016/j.still.2003.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SL, Simelton E, Lovdahl L, Grip H, Chen DL (2007) Simulated long-term effects of different soil management regimes on the water balance in the Loess Plateau, China. Field Crops Res 100:311–319. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2006.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the national program on key basic research project of China (2014CB954303).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Resource and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Xinjiekouwai Street 19, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, People’s Republic of China

    Ying Xu, Haiping Tang, Bojie Wang & Jiao Chen

Authors
  1. Ying Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haiping Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bojie Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiao Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiping Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Tang, H., Wang, B. et al. Effects of land-use intensity on ecosystem services and human well-being: a case study in Huailai County, China. Environ Earth Sci 75, 416 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5103-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5103-2

Keywords