Skip to main content
Log in

A modified DRASTIC model for assessing contamination risk of groundwater in the northern suburb of Yinchuan, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater vulnerability assessment is a common method to describe groundwater contamination. However, intensive human activities have a marked impact on subsurface environment. Therefore, in this paper, the DRTILSQ model which is based on DRASTIC and considers human influences was proposed. The contamination risk of groundwater underlying the northern suburb of Yinchuan city was assessed. According to local hydrogeological settings, seven factors were singled out for representing intrinsic vulnerability, pollution loading and groundwater value, respectively. Analytical hierarchy process was adopted to determine weights, which makes the model harmonize with the study area and easy to transplant. The results show that high contamination risk area is in the central zone with shallow buried depth of groundwater, highly permeable vadose zone, high recharge and agricultural pollution. Except that, extremely high contamination risk is associated with high groundwater value and industrial threats. Compared to the vulnerability map, the contamination risk map presents a more reasonable classification. The maps are valuable tools for environmental management. The DRTILSQ can be transplanted to Yinchuan Plain or northwest China, and provides experience for developing models of groundwater contamination risk assessment for individual regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Perry RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potentials using hydrogeological settings. EPA/600/2-87/035. US Environmental Protection Agency

  • Armengol S, Sanchez-Vila X, Folch A (2014) An approach to aquifer vulnerability including uncertainty in a spatial random function framework. J Hydrol 517:889–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughriba M, Barkaoui A, Zarhloule Y, Lahmer Z, El Houadi B, Verdoya M (2010) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping of the Angad transboundary aquifer using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment. Arabian J Geosci 3(2):207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision of China (1994) Quality Standard for Ground Water. GB/T 14848-1993. Standards Press of China, Beijing

  • Celico F, Naclerio G (2005) Verification of a DRASTIC-based method for limestone aquifers. Water Int 30(4):530–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edet A (2014) An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Benin formation aquifer, Calabar, southeastern Nigeria, using DRASTIC and GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 71(4):1747–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimers JL, Weaver JC, Terziotti S, Midgette RW (2000) Methods of rating unsaturated zone and watershed characteristics of public water supplies in North Carolina. Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4283, U.S. Geological Survey

  • Fang PX, Wei ZD, Liao ZS (1996) Applied hydrogeology. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Focazio MJ, Reilly TE, Rupert MG, Helsel DR (2002) Assessing ground-water vulnerability to contamination: providing scientifically defensible information for decision makers. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey

  • Foster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability pollution risk and protection strategy. In: van Duijvenbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, pp 69–86

  • Friesel P (1987) Vulnerability of groundwater in relation to subsurface behaviour of organic pollutants. In: van Duijvenbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, pp 729–740

  • Fu SS, Wang YX, Cai HS, Li YL (2000) Vulnerability to contamination of groundwater in urban regions. Earth Sci 25(5):482–486 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogu RC, Dassargues A (2000) Sensitivity analysis for the EPIK method of vulnerability assessment in a small karstic aquifer, southern Belgium. Hydrogeol J 8(3):337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider N (2005) Karst groundwater vulnerability mapping: application of a new method in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Hydrogeol J 13(4):555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo QH, Wang YX, Gao XB, Ma T (2007) A new model (DRARCH) for assessing groundwater vulnerability to arsenic contamination at basin scale: a case study in Taiyuan basin, northern China. Environ Geol 52(5):923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlinger R, Viero AP (2007) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in coastal plain of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, using drastic and adsorption capacity of soils. Environ Geol 52(5):819–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huan H, Wang JS, Teng YG (2012) Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Jilin City of northeast China. Sci Total Environ 440:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauco S (1987) Motion of pollutants in the groundwater as factor of their vulnerability. In: van Duijvenbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, pp 403–408

  • Lee J, Ko K, Kim T, Kim JG, Cho S, Oh I (2006) Analysis of the effect of geology, soil properties, and land use on groundwater quality using multivariate statistical and GIS methods. Chin J Geochem 25(S1):152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1993) Ground water vulnerability assessment: predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1997) Value ground water: economic concepts and approaches. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B, Dadras M (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong Or BTI, Long-cang S (2007) Groundwater overdraft vulnerability and environmental impact assessment in Arusha. Environ Geol 51(7):1171–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Li PY, Howard KWF, Yang C, Zhang XD (2012) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the Yinchuan Plain, Northwest China using OREADIC. Environ Monit Assess 184:3613–3628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28(1):32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro L (2000) SI: a new index of aquifer susceptibility to agricultural pollution. Internal report, ER-SHA/CVRM, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Ritter WF, Chirnside AEM (1984) Impact of land use on ground-water quality in Southern Delaware. Ground Water 22(1):38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi S, Bouri S, Ben Dhia H, Anselme B (2011) Assessment of groundwater risk using intrinsic vulnerability and hazard mapping: application to Souassi aquifer, Tunisian Sahel. Agric Water Manag 98(10):1671–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener E, Davraz A (2013) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 21(3):701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subirana JM, Casas A (1987) Groundwater vulnerabiltiy to pollutants of the low Llobregat Valley (Barcelona, Spain), work method and evolution study of the gravel-pit exploitations. In: van Duijvenbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, pp 477–479

  • Taheri K, Gutiérrez F, Mohseni H, Raeisi E, Taheri M (2015) Sinkhole susceptibility mapping using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and magnitude–frequency relationships: a case study in Hamadan province, Iran. Geomorphology 234:64–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran LT, Knight CG, O’Neill RV, Smith ER, Riitters KH, Wickham J (2002) Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the mid-Atlantic region. Environ Manag 29(6):845–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vías JM, Andreo B, Perles MJ, Carrasco F, Vadillo I, Jiménez P (2006) Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method. Hydrogeol J 14(6):912–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorine Neh A, Ako Ako A, Richard Ayuk A, Hosono T (2015) DRASTIC-GIS model for assessing vulnerability to pollution of the phreatic aquiferous formations in Douala-Cameroon. J Afr Earth Sci 102:180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YX, Merkel BJ, Li YL, Ye H, Fu SS, Ihm D (2007) Vulnerability of groundwater in Quaternary aquifers to organic contaminants: a case study in Wuhan City, China. Environ Geol 53(3):479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JJ, He JT, Chen HH (2012) Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China. Sci Total Environ 432:216–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu XH, Qian H, Yu DM (2008) Investigation and assessment of rational allocation of groundwater resources in the Yinchuan Plain. Geology Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaporozec A (2002) Groundwater contamination inventory: a methodological guide. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Wang L (2003) Groundwater resources in Ningxia. Ningxia People Publishing House, Yinchuan (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong ZS (2005) A discussion of groundwater vulnerability assessment methods. Earth Sci Front 12(Suppl):3–11 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41172212), the Foundation for the Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of Chang’an University (310829165005) and Study on Water Environmental Early Warning in Ningxia. Anonymous reviewers are sincerely acknowledged for their useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Chen, J. & Qian, H. A modified DRASTIC model for assessing contamination risk of groundwater in the northern suburb of Yinchuan, China. Environ Earth Sci 75, 483 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5094-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5094-z

Keywords

Navigation