Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-temporal assessment of ground cover restoration and soil erosion risks along petroleum and gas pipelines in Azerbaijan using GIS and remote sensing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of this research was to perform vegetation cover restoration and soil erosion risk assessment based on multi-temporal NDVI monitoring and deterministic USLE erosion prediction model along Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan Oil and South Caucasus Gas pipelines. The categorization of NDVI derived from IKONOS 2007 and PLEIADES 2012 high-resolution multispectral satellite images into the bare lands, sparse and dense vegetation revealed the positive vegetation cover restoration along oil and gas pipelines. The change detection analysis of NDVIs showed that the class of ‘Significant Increase in Vegetation’ was 5.40 km2 within the croplands. However, the classes of ‘Significant Decrease in Vegetation’ and ‘No Significant Change in Vegetation’ were observed to be 2.56 and 5.10 km2 within croplands, correspondingly. This decrease can be explained by the encumbrances applied for the partial restrictions of land-use activities along oil and gas pipelines to mitigate potential risks to pipelines and by the slow natural vegetation restoration. NDVI analysis for 50-m section polygons of pipeline corridor and contiguous areas showed that 7072 polygons had no significant NDVI difference in 2012, whereas in 2007 it was 4383. USLE model run with cover-management factor derived from PLEIADES NDVI 2012 showed higher number of polygons with predicted erosion class of ‘0–10 ton/ha’ which is acceptable and not critical to pipelines. For higher erosion classes more than ‘0–10 ton/ha’, USLE model run with IKONOS NDVI 2007 revealed higher number of polygons. USLE model run predicted 37 % of total number of erosion occurrences identified during 2005–2014.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Aliyev F, Muller H, Salmanova L, Bayramov E (2006) Azerbaijan—the land of incomparable nature p 213

  • Bayramov ER (2013) Quantitative assessment of vegetation renaturation and soil degradation and their control by climate and ground factors along rights-of-way of petroleum/gas pipelines, Azerbaijan. PhD Dissertation. Dresden University of Technology. Dresden, Germany

  • Bayramov E, Buchroithner MF, McGurty E (2012a) Determination of main climate and ground factors controlling vegetation cover regrowth along oil and gas pipelines using multiple, spatial and geographically weighted regression procedures. Environ Earth Sci 66:2047–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayramov E, Buchroithner M, McGurty E (2012b) Quantitative assessment of vegetation cover and soil degradation factors within terrain units for planning, monitoring and assessment of renaturation along oil and gas pipelines. Geocarto International 27(7):535–555. doi:10.1080/10106049.2011.648662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayramov E, Buchroithner M, McGurty E (2012c) Prediction reliability, quantitative differences and spatial variations of erosion models for long-range petroleum and gas infrastructure. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 6(4):252–272. doi:10.1080/17499518.2012.743834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayramov E, Buchroithner M, McGurty E (2013) Differences of MMF and USLE models for soil loss prediction along BTC and SCP pipelines. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 4(1) 81–96. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000117

  • Benavides-solorio J, Macdonald LH (2005) Measurement and prediction of post-fire erosion at hillslope scale, Colorado Front Range. Int J Wildland Fire 14:457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beskow S, Mello CR, Norton LD, curi N, Viola MR, Avanzi JC (2009) Soil erosion prediction in the Grande River Basin, Brazil using distributed modeling. Catena 79:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biot Y (1990) THEPROM - an erosion productivity model. In: Boardman J, Foster IDL, Dearing JA (eds) Soil erosion on agricultural land. Wiley, Chichester, pp 465–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson TN, Ripley DA (1997) On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sens Environ 62:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafalla MS (2006) Mapping and assessment of land use/land cover using remote sensing and GIS in North Kordofan State, Sudan. Dissertation. Technischen Universität Dresden

  • De asis AM, Omasa K (2007) Estimation of vegetation parameter for modeling soil erosion using linear spectral mixture analysis of landsat ETM data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 62(4):309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De asis AM, Omasa K, Oki K, Shimizu Y (2008) Accuracy and applicability of linear spectral unmixing in delineating potential erosion areas in tropical watersheds. Int J Remote Sens 29:4151–4171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De jong SM (1994) Derivation of vegetative variables from a landsat TM image for erosion modelling. Earth Surf Proc Land 19:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De jong SM, Paracchini ML, Bertolo F, Folving S, Megier J, De roo APJ (1999) Regional assessment of soil erosion using the distributed model SEMMED and remotely sensed data. Catena 37:291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duzant J (2008) Toward guidance for the design and placement of vegetated filter strips. Dissertation, Cranfield University

  • Elgubshawi A (2008) Soil degradation: its aspects and modelling a case study of northeast Nuba Mountain South Kordofan State, Sudan. Dissertation, Technischen Universität Dresden

  • Erdogan EH, Erpul G, Bayramin I (2007) Use of USLE/GIS Methodology for predicting soil loss in a semiarid agricultural watershed. Environ Monit Assess 131:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez C, Vega JA, Fonturbel MT, Perez-gorostiaga P, Jimenez E, Madrigal J (2007) Effects of wildfire, salvage logging and slash treatments on soil degradation. Land Degrad Dev 18:591–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez C, Vega JA, Vieira DCS (2010) Assessing soil erosion after fire and rehabilitation treatments in NW Spain: performance of RUSLE and revised Morgan–Morgan–Finney models. Land Degrad Dev 21:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hann MJ, Morgan RPC (2006) Evaluating erosion control measures for biorestoration between the time of soil reinstatement and vegetation establishment. Earth Surf Proc Land 31:589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hann MJ, Morgan RPC, Shilston D, Mirtskhoulava TSE, Gasca AH, Clarke J, Sweeney M (2004) Vegetation establishment and management for the restoration of pipeline rights-of-way. In: Sweeney M (ed) Terrain and geohazard challenges facing onshore oil and gas pipelines. London, Thomas Telford, pp 673–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. doi:10.1002/joc.1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson NW (1995) Soil conservation, 3rd edn. Batsford, London. p 391. ISBN 0-7134-7353-3

  • Jain SK, Singh P, Seth SM (2002) Assessment of sedimentation in Bhakra Reservoir in the western Himalayan region using remotely sensed data. Hydrol Sci J 47:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws JO, Parsons DA (1943) The relationship of raindrop size to intensity. Trans Am Geophys Union 24:452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Lin W, Chou W (2002) Soil erosion prediction and sediment yield estimation: the Taiwan experience. Soil Tillage Res 68:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta RS (1999) Application, project, and analytical approach. In: Ross Lunetta S, Christopher Elvidge D (eds) Remote sensing change detection environmental monitoring methods and applications. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger K, Konz N, Schaub M, Alewell C (2010) Soil erosion modelled with USLE and PESERA using QuickBird derived vegetation parameters in an alpine catchment. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 12:208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. In: the state and movement of water in living organism. Proceedings of the 19th symposium of the society of experimental biology, Cambridge, pp 205–234

  • Morgan RPC (1995) Soil erosion and conservation. Longman Scientific and Technical, 2nd edn. Harlow, UK, p 198

  • Morgan RPC (2005) Soil erosion and conservation, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, p 304

  • Morgan RPC, Hann MJ, Shilston D, Mirtskhoulava TSE, Gasca AH, Clarke J, Sweeney M (2004) Use of terrain analysis as a basis for erosion of risk assessment along pipeline rights-of-way: a case study from Georgia. In: Sweeney M (ed) Terrain and geohazard challenges facing onshore oil and gas pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, pp 324–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Mu Q, Heinsch FA, Zhao M, Running SW (2007) Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data. Remote Sens Environ 111:519–536. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzein BS (2006) Remote Sensing & GIS for land cover/land use change detection and analysis in the semi-natural ecosystems and agriculture landscapes of the central ethiopian rift valley. Dissertation, Technischen Universität Dresden

  • Pannuk CD, Robichaud PR (2003) Effectiveness of needle cast at reducing erosion after forest fires. Water Resour Res 39:1333–1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson FB, Robichaud PR, Spaeth KE (2001) Spatial and temporal effects of wildfire on the hydrology of a steep rangeland watershed. Hydrol Process 15:2953–2965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Ferreira VA (1993) RUSLE model description and database sensitivity. J Environ Qual 22(3):458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Mc cool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook n-703. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC

  • Steven MD, Malthus TJ, Baret F, Xu H, Chopping MJ (2003) Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems. Remote Sens Environ 88(4):412–422. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulieman HM (2008) Mapping and modelling of vegetation changes in the Southern Gadarif Region, Sudan, Using Remote Sensing. Dissertation, Technischen Universität Dresden

  • Suriyaprasit M (2008) Digital terrain analysis and image processing for assessing erosion prone areas. Dissertation, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation

  • Thornes JB (1990) The interaction of erosional and vegetational dynamics in land degradation: spatial outcomes. In: Thornes JB (ed) Vegetation and erosion. Wiley, Chichester, pp 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend JRG, Justice CO (1986) Analysis of the dynamics of African vegetation using the normalized difference vegetation index. Int J Remote Sens 7:1435–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Um JS, Wright R (1998) A comparative evaluation of video remote sensing and field survey for revegetation monitoring of a pipeline route. Sci Total Environ 215:189–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der knijff M, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (1999) Soil erosion risk in Italy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2000) Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, p 34

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega JA, Fernandez C, Fonturbel T (2005) Throughfall, runoff and soil erosion alter prescribed burning in gorse shrubland in Galicia (NW Spain). Land Degrad Dev 15:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Vemu S, Udayabhaskar P (2010) An integrated approach for prioritization of reservoir catchment using remote sensing and geographic information system techniques. Geocarto Int 25(2):149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenbrenner JW, Mac donald LH, Rough D (2006) Effectiveness of three post-fire rehabilitation treatments in the Colorado Front Range. Hydrol Process 20:2989–3006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winning HK, Hann MJ (2014) Modelling soil erosion risk for pipelines using remote sensed data. Biosyst Eng 127:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. US department of agriculture, agricultural handbook number, vol. 537. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf S (2006) Bodenerosion als Funktion veränderter Landnutzungsstruktur– Modellierung der Entwicklung am Beispiel der Nationalparkregion Sächsische Schweiz. Dissertation, Technischen Universität Dresden

  • Zachar D (1982) Soil erosion. Developments in soil science 10. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emil R. Bayramov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayramov, E.R., Buchroithner, M.F. & Bayramov, R.V. Multi-temporal assessment of ground cover restoration and soil erosion risks along petroleum and gas pipelines in Azerbaijan using GIS and remote sensing. Environ Earth Sci 75, 256 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5044-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5044-9

Keywords