Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Joint application of satellite remote sensing, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and resistivity techniques for targeting ground water in fractured Ophiolites of South Andaman Island, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ophiolitic complex of the study area oriented in N–S direction, having moderate to steep slopes of the topography and characterized by strong heterogeneity, repetitive deformations and multiple intrusions. Ophiolites of the study area encompass the major groundwater-bearing zones. Generally, these formations have shallower fractured aquifers of a thickness 30–45 m and sometimes due to deep tensile fractures the thickness of aquifer exceeds more than 60 m with a considerable groundwater yield. A joint venture of satellite remote sensing, geoelectrical resistivity and ground penetrating radar (GPR) techniques has been used to assess the groundwater potential of the fractured Ophiolites. The interpreted resistivity inversion model and GPR results were incorporated with borehole lithologs for their subsurface properties and structural variations. The integration of using multiple techniques has increased the accuracy of interpretation, and thus conflated results significantly rendered the existence of weathered and fractured zone having hydrogeological importance. Based on the parameters, viz., geoelectrical properties of layers, reflection configuration, thickness of weathered and fractured aquifer zone, a typical aquifer model for the study area that contains various layers and subtle structural variation has been developed. Further, the derived integrated geophysical data also detail on various lithological characteristics and advances the understanding about aquifer systems of fractured Ophiolites and the distribution of groundwater in fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annan AP (1997) Ground penetrating radar workshop notes. Sensors & Software Inc, Mississauga

    Google Scholar 

  • Asprion U, Aigner T (1997) Aquifer architecture analysis using ground-penetrating radar: Triassic and Quaternary examples (S. Germany). Environ Geol 31:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakliwal PC (1978) Tectonic interpretation from lineament analysis using photogeophysical techniques of Ranthamber fort areas, Rajasthan, India. Third regional conference on geology and mineral resource of Southeast Asia, p 129–131

  • Balaji S, Ramasamy SM (1993) Aid of remote sensing in mapping geofractures of environmental significance in Tamil Nadu. J Ind Soc Remote Sen 21:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaji S, Ramasamy SM (2005) Remote sensing and resistivity image for the tectonic analysis of Biligirirangan region of Peninsular India. Geocarto Int 20:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker RD, White CC, Houston JFT (1992) Borehole sitting in an African accelerated drought relief project. In: Wright EP, Burgess WG (eds) Hydrogeology of crystalline basement aquifers in Africa. Geol Soc, London, pp 183–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer P, Huggenberger P, Renard P et al (2011) Three-dimensional high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog: part 1: field study. J Hydrol 405:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beres MJ, Haeni FP (1991) Application of ground-penetrating-radar methods in hydrogeologic studies. GroundWater 29:375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhosle B, Parkash B, Awasthi AK et al (2007) Remote sensing-GIS and GPR studies of two active faults, Western Gangetic Plains, India. J Appl Geophys 61:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian Z, Lei S, Inyang HI et al (2009) Integrated method of RS and GPR for monitoring the changes in the soil moisture and groundwater environment due to underground coal mining. Environ Geol 57:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling JC, Rodriguez AB, Harry DL et al (2005) Delineating alluvial aquifer heterogeneity using resistivity and GPR data. GroundWater 43:890–903

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann CE, Fernandez A, Ballon R, et al. (1977) Analysis of geological structures based on landsat 1 images. In: Smith WL (ed) Remote sensing applications for mineral exploration. 292–317

  • Busby JP, Merritt JW (1999) Quaternary deformation mapping with ground penetrating radar. J Appl Geophys 41:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CGWB (2010) Approach paper on ground water quality issues in Islands (Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep). Government of India, New Delhi 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JL, Annan AP (1989) Ground penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophys Prospect 37:531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakate R, Singh VS, Negi BC et al (2008) Geomorphological and geophysical approach for locating favorable groundwater zones in granitic terrain, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Environ Manag 88:1373–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doetsch J, Linde N, Pessognelli M et al (2012) Constraining 3-D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization. J Appl Geophys 78:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle JA, Jenkinson B, Hopkins D et al (2006) Hydropedological investigations with ground-penetrating radar (GPR): estimating water-table depths and local ground-water flow pattern in areas of coarse-textured soils. Geoderma 131:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaber A, Koch M, Griesh MH et al (2011) SAR remote sensing of buried faults: implications for groundwater exploration in the Western Desert of Egypt. Sens Imag 12:133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D, Piro S (2013) GPR remote sensing in archaeology. Springer, Berlin 244

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingemar L (1984) Ground water in hard rocks. Project 8.6 ed. UNESCO, Paris, France, p 228

  • Israil M, Al-hadithi M, Singhal DC (2006) Application of a resistivity survey and geographical information system (GIS) analysis for hydrogeological zoning of a piedmont area, Himalayan foothill region, India. Hydrogeol J 14:753–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil MH (2010) Hydro-geophysical configuration for the quaternary aquifer of Nuweiba alluvial fan. J Environ Eng Geophys (JEEG) 15:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch M, Gaber A, Burkholder B et al (2012) Development of new water resources in Egypt with earth observation data: opportunities and challenges. Int J Environ Sustain 1:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Shetler D, Dennyson KA (2009) Bore well survey report. Andaman water project. Emmanuel Hospital Association, New Delhi 38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapen DR, Moorman BJ, Price JS (1996) Using ground-penetrating radar to delineate subsurface features along a wetland catena. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:923–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallik SB, Bhattacharya DC, Nag SK (1983) Behaviour of fractures in hard rocks—a study by surface geology and radial VES method. Geoexploration 21:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maury S (2012) Strategies on groundwater resources management and development of South Andaman Islands, India—An Extensive approach of remote sensing and ground penetrating radar (GPR). National Conference on Quest for Advancements in Civil Engineering (QACE’ 12). SRM University, Chennai, 506–514

  • Maury S (2014) Spatial modeling of ground water potential in parts of South Andaman Island, India—an integrated approach of remote sensing and geophysical techniques. Department of Disaster Management, Pondicherry University, Pudducherry 246

    Google Scholar 

  • Maury S, Balaji S (2014a) Geoelectrical method in the investigation of groundwater resource and related issues in Ophiolite and Flysch formations of Port Blair, Andaman Island, India. Environ Earth Sci 71:183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maury S, Balaji S (2014b) An integrated ground penetrating radar (GPR) and geoelectric methods for deciphering potential ground water aquifers of beodnabad catchment, South Andaman Island. In: Roy I (ed) Workshop on conservation of water resources in Andaman & Nicobar Islands: issue and challenges. CGWB, Kolkata, pp 28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer PJL (1984) A surface resistivity method for measuring hydrologic characteristics of jointed formations. 8901. U.S. Bureau of Mines, 45

  • McDowell PW (1979) Geophysical mapping of water filled fracture zones in rocks. Int Assoc Eng Geol Bull 19:258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill JD (1980) Electrical conductivity of soils and rocks. Geonics Limited, Mississauga (technical note TN-5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros WE, de Lima OAL (1990) A geoelectrical investigation for ground water in crystalline terrains of Central Bahia, Brazil. GroundWater 28:518–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijerink AMJ, Bannert D, Batelaan O, et al. (2007) Remote Sensing Applications to Groundwater. In: Rubio M (ed) IHP-VI, Series on Groundwater No.16 ed. Paris, France: UNESCO, 311

  • Mohammad HM (2004) Integrating GPR and geostatistical techniques to map the spatial extent of a shallow groundwater system. J Geophys Eng 1:56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GF, Curray JR and Emmel FJ. (1982) Sedimentation in the Sunda trench and forearc region. In: Trench-Forearc geology: sedimentation and tectonics on Modern and ancient active plate margins. Geological Society of London 10: 245–258

  • Mukhopadhyay B, Fnais M, Mukhopadhyay M et al (2010) Seismic cluster analysis for the Burmese-Andaman and West Sunda Arc: insight into subduction kinematics and seismic potentiality. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 1:283–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento da Silva CC, Medeiros WE, Jardim de Sa EF et al (2004) Resistivity and ground-penetrating radar images of fractures in a crystalline aquifer: a case study in Caicara farm—NE Brazil. J Appl Geophys 56:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan BT, Campbell DL, Senterfit RM (1998) Depth of the base of the Jackson aquifer, based on geophysical exploration, southern Jackson Hole, Wyoming, USA. Hydrogeol J 6:374–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orellana E, Money HM (1966) Master tables and curves for vertical electrical sounding over layered structures. Interciencia, Madrid (Costanilla de Los Angeles, 15)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal T, Chakraborty PP, Gupta TD et al (2003) Geodynamic evolution of the outer arc-forearc belt in the Andaman Islands, the central part of the Burma-java subduction complex. Geol Mag 140:289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park YH, Doh SJ, Yun ST (2007) Geoelectric resistivity sounding of riverside alluvial aquifer in an agricultural area at Buyeo, Geum River watershed, Korea: an application to groundwater contamination study. Environ Geol 53:849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsani JL, Elis VR, Hiodo FY (2004) Geophysical investigations for the characterization of fractured rock aquifers in Itu, SE Brazil. J Appl Geophys 57:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju NJ, Reddy TVK (1998) Fracture pattern and electrical resistivity studies for groundwater exploration. Environ Geol 34:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin LA, Fowler JC (1978) Ground-probing radar for delineation of rock fractures. Eng Geol 12:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg SK, Slater LD, Versteeg R (2002) An integrated geophysical investigation of the hydrogeology of an anisotropic unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 267:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid S, Nath SK (2002) GIS integration of remote sensing and electrical sounding data for hydrogeological exploration. J Spat Hydrol 2:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh VS, Nandakumar MV, Sarma MRK et al (2005) Changes in groundwater regime at Neill Island (South Andaman) due to earthquake and tsunami. Curr Sci 88:1984–1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Bhattacharya AK (2006) Groundwater assessment through an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and resistivity techniques: a case study from a hard rock terrain. Int J Remote Sens 27:4599–4620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava VK, Giri DN, Bharadwaj P (2012) Study and mapping of ground water prospect using remote sensing, GIS and geoelectrical resistivity techniques—a case study of Dhanbad district, Jharkhand, India. J Ind Geophys Union 16:55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulriksen CPF (1982) Application of impulse radar to civil engineering. Lund University of Technology, Lund (republished by Geophysical Survey Systems Inc., Hudson, NH)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohdy AAR (1969) The use of Schlumberger and equatorial soundings in groundwater investigations near El Paso, Texas. Geophysics 34:713–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was accomplished under the Ph.D. research grant (PU/CE/E9/PHD/2009-10) funded by Pondicherry University to the first author. The first author is thankful to Geo Foundation and Structures (P) Ltd, Port Blair, Military Engineering Service, Port Blair, for providing him a great opportunity to work on some pivotal projects and experience with these organizations immensely improved this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shrikant Maury.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We do not have any conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maury, S., Tiwari, R.K. & Balaji, S. Joint application of satellite remote sensing, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and resistivity techniques for targeting ground water in fractured Ophiolites of South Andaman Island, India. Environ Earth Sci 75, 237 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5007-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5007-1

Keywords

Navigation