Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of water retention capacity of granular media of methane biofilters: a simplified approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methane biofilter (MBF) is a promising bioprocess technology capable of attenuating point-source and low-volume methane emissions from anthropogenic sources. Water availability is one of the most important factors affecting the growth of microorganisms; hence, water retention capacity (WRC) is a key determinant of the performance of granular filter materials when used as microbial growth media. Considering the difficulty in conducting extensive laboratory experiments to determine WRC of competing granular materials, the availability of a simple, but accurate, model for the assessment of WRC of granular materials could be an asset for practicing engineers involved in the design and operation of MBFs. This paper presents results from an assessment of the applicability of Peleg model for the estimation of WRC of granular materials that can be used as filter media in MBFs. Results show that there is high correlation between the laboratory determined water desorption values and the values predicted by Peleg model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Adams B, Besnard L, Bogner F, Hilger H (2011) Bio-tarp alternative to daily cover prototypes for methane oxidation atop open landfill cells. Waste Manag 31:1065–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arulneyam D, Swaminathan T (2000) Biodegradation of ethanol vapour in a biofilter. Bioprocess Eng 22:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2008) Standard test methods for determination of the soil water characteristic curve for desorption using a hanging column, pressure extractor, chilled mirror hygrometer, and/or centrifuge. ASTM D6836–02(2008):e2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn HL, Bohn KH (1999) Moisture in biofilters. Environ Prog 18(3):156–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitwood DE, Devinny JS (2001) Treatment of mixed hydrogen sulfide and organic vapors in a rock medium biofilter. Water Environ Res 73:426–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhoménie MC, Heitz M (2005) Biofiltration of air: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 25:53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfield P (2009) Methanotrophy in extreme environments. In: Encyclopedia of life sciences (ELS). John Wiley & Sons

  • Hillel D (2004) Introduction to environmental soil physics. Elsevier Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Labuza PT, Altunakar B (2007) Water activity prediction and moisture sorption isotherms. In: Barbosa-Canovas GV, Fontana AJ, Schmidt SJ, Labuza TP (eds) Water activity in foods: fundamentals and applications 1. John Wiley & Sons Inc, USA, pp 109–131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li GW, Hu HY, Hao JM, Fujie K (2002) Use of biological activated carbon to treat mixed gas of toluene and benzene in biofilter. Environ Technol 23:467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre JP, Gamisans X, Gabriel D, Lafuente J (2007) Fungal biofilters for toluene biofiltration: evalualtion of the performance with four packing materials under different operating conditions. Chemosphere 67:684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2012) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Sagastume JM, Noyola A (2006) Hydrogen sulfide removal by compost biofiltration: effect of mixing the filter media on operational factors. Bioresource Technol 97:1546–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg M (1988) An empirical model for the description of moisture sorption curves. J Food Sci 53:1216–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philopoulos A, Ruck J, McCartney D, Felske C (2009) A laboratory comparison of compost and sand-compost-perlite as methane-oxidizing biofilter media. Waste Manage Res 27:138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokhrel D (2006) Compost based biocap performance. Doctoral dissertation. University of Calgary, Department of Civil Engineering, Calgary, Alberta, Canada:80–101

  • Rusdi M, Moroi Y (2003) Evaporation rate measurement of water and liquid 1-alkanols across air-liquid interface using thermogravimetry. Bull Chem Soc Japan 76:919–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas K, Bogner JE (2011) Limits and dynamics of methane oxidation in landfill cover soils. Waste Manag 31:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahraoui K, Rho D (1998) Biodegradation of BTX vapors in a compost medium biofilter. Compost Sci Util 6:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turhan M, Sayar S, Gunasekaran S (2002) Application of Peleg model to study water absorption in chickpea during soaking. J Food Eng 53:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanapalli SK, Sillers WS, Fredlund MD (1998) The meaning and relevance of residual state to unsaturated soils. 51st Canadian Geotechnical Conference. Edmonton, Alberta, pp 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilshusen JH, Hettiaratchi JPA, Stein VB (2004) Long-term behavior of passively aerated compost methanotrophic biofilter columns. Waste Manage 24:643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Minuth B, Allen DG (2002) Effects of nitrogen and oxygen on biofilter performance. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon IK, Park CH (2002) Effects of gas flow rate, inlet concentration and temperature on biofiltration of volatile organic compounds in a peat-packed biofilter. J Biosci Bioeng 93:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge NSERC (Canada) and CONACYT (Mexico, as a doctoral scholarship for the primary author) for financial support. The support from the Edmonton Waste Management Centre and the City of Calgary by providing the compost samples is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Hettiaratchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mancebo, U., Hettiaratchi, P., Jayasinghe, P. et al. Determination of water retention capacity of granular media of methane biofilters: a simplified approach. Environ Earth Sci 75, 74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4907-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4907-4

Keywords