Abstract
Habitat degradation has been proven to result associated with drought in karst region in south China. However, how this drought condition relates to CO2 efflux is not clear. In this study, we designed a simulated epikarst water–rock (limestone)–soil–plant columns, under varying water levels (treatment), and monitored CO2 concentration and efflux in soil in different seasons during 2011. The results showed that increased soil water greatly enhanced CO2 concentrations. With which treatment with epikarst water (WEW) had higher CO2 concentration than without epikarst water (WOEW). This was particularly high in low soil water treatment and during high temperature in the summer season. Under 30–40 % relative soil water content (RSWC), CO2 concentration in WEW treatment was 1.44 times of WOEW; however, under 90–100 % RSWC, this value was smaller. Comparatively, soil surface CO2 efflux (soil respiration) was 1.29–1.94 μmol m−2 s−1 in WEW and 1.35–2.04 μmol m−2 s−1 in WOEW treatment, respectively. CO2 efflux increased with increasing RSWC, but it was not as sensitive to epikarst water supply as CO2 concentration. WEW tended to weakly influence CO2 efflux under very dry or very wet soil condition and under low temperature. High CO2 efflux in WEW occurred under 50–80 % RSWC during summer. Both CO2 concentrations and CO2 efflux were very sensitive to temperature increase. As a result, at degraded karst environment, increased temperature may enhance CO2 concentration and CO2 emission; meanwhile, the loss of epikarst and soil water deficiency may decrease soil CO2 concentration and CO2 emission, which in turn may decrease karst corrosion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Bakalowicz M (2004) Epikarst, the skin of karst. In: Jones WK, Culver DC, Herman JS (eds) Epikarst Proceedings of the symposium held October 1 through 4, 2003, Shepherdstown, West Virginia, USA. Karst Waters Inst. Spec. Publ. 9, Charles Town, West Virginia, pp 16–22
Bakalowicz M (2005) Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources. J Hydrogeol 13:148–160
Bonacci O, Pipan T, Culver DC (2009) A framework for karst ecohydrology. Environ Geol 56:891–900
Cao JH, Yuan DX, Pan GX, Jiang GH (2004) Influence of soil carbon transfer under different vegetations on carbon cycle of karst dynamics system. Earth Env 32(1):90–96 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Correiaa AC, Minunnoa F, Caldeiraa MC, Banzaa J, Mateusb J, Carneiroa M, Wingatec L, Shvalevad A, Ramosa A, Jongena M, Bugalhoe MN, Nogueiraa C, Lecomtea X, Pereiraa JS (2012) Soil water availability strongly modulates soil CO2 efflux in different Mediterranean ecosystems: model calibration using the Bayesian approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 161:88–100
Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biol. 4:217–227
Epron D, Farque L, Lucot E, Badot PM (1999) Soil CO2 efflux in a beech forest: dependence on soil temperature and soil water content. Ann For Sci 56:221–226
Fang C, Mocrieff JB (2001) The dependence of CO2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 33:155–165
Harrison K, Broecher WS, Bonani G (1993) A strategy for estimation the impact of CO2 fertilization on soil carbon storage. Global Biogeochem Cycles 7:69–80
He SY, Ran JC, Yuan DX, Xie YQ (2001) A Comparative study on hydrological and ecological effects in different karst ecosystems. Acta Geosci Sin 22(3):265–270 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Houghton RA, Woodwell GM (1989) Global climate change. Sci Am 260:18–26
Hu LN, Su YR, He XY (2012) Soil respiration characteristic of on typical karst soils with different vegetation in karst region of southwest China. Ecol Env Sci 21(7):1218–1222 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Klimchouk AB (2000) The formation of epikarst and its role in vadose speleogenesis. In: Speleogenesis, evolution of karst aquifers, January 2000 Edt, National Speleological Society, pp 91–99
Li GC, Cao JH (2012) Soil CO2 Concentration under castanea mollissima region in karst areas at dry and rainy seasons. Chin agric sci bull 28(01):39–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Li YY, Mu B, Zhu XK, Long CL (1998) Microclimate characteristics of different successional stages of communities of karst forest. J Mt Agric Biol 17(6):364–367 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liu ZH, Zhao J (1999) Contribution of carbonate rock weathering to the atmospheric CO2 sink. Environ Geol 39(9):1053–1058
Liu ZH, Dreybrodt W, Wang HJ (2010) A new direction in effective accounting for the atmospheric CO2 budget: considering the combined action of carbonate dissolution, the global water cycle and photosynthetic uptake of DIC by aquatic organisms. Earth Sci Rev 99:162–172
Pingintha N, Leclerc M, Beasley JJ (2010) Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: comparison of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient. Tellus 62B:47–58
Raich JW (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44B:81–99
Ran JC, He SY Cao JH, Xiong ZB (2002) A preliminary research on CO2 release in subtropical karst forest soil. Guizhou Sci 20(2):42–47 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Schimel DS (1995) Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biol 1(1):77–91
Thierron V, Laudelout H (1996) Contribution of root respiration to total CO2 efflux from the soil of a deciduous forest. Can J For Res 26:1142–1148
Trček B (2007) How can the epikarst zone influence the karst aquifer hydraulic behavior? Environ Geol 51:761–765
Xu M, Qi Y (2001) Soil-surface CO2 efflux and its spatial and temporal variations in a young ponderosa pine plantation in northern California. Glob Change Biol 7:667–677
Yu GS, Wang SJ, Rong L (2011) Microclimate characteristics of different microhabitats in succession stages of Maolan Karst Forest. Earth Env 39(4):469–477 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Yuan DX (1997) The carbon cycle in karst. Z Geomorphol 108:91–102
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the fund of National Nature Science Foundation of China (41172313), Karst Dynamic Laboratory opening funding (Kdl2008-01, Geological Survey-01-15-02), and the Provincial Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi (1123014). An earlier version of this paper was benefited from additional review and linguistic editing by Professor Azim Mallik of Lakehead University, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuqing, H., Yanyu, L., Guangping, X. et al. CO2 emission response to different water conditions under simulated karst environment. Environ Earth Sci 74, 1091–1097 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4539-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4539-8