Abstract
Heavy metal soil contamination provides a danger both to human and environmental ecosystem health and is still on the rise in many developing countries. Electroremediation provides an innovative method to remedy contamination of soils by heavy metals. Fundamental to the acceptance of any soil remedial technique is proof that positive benefits outweigh the negative impacts, in terms of soil health. The environmental effect of electroremediation of heavy metals contaminated soil by some biological indicators was evaluated. A soil contaminated with Zn, Pb, Ni, and Cd was used in a laboratory experiment. Treatment was imposed with a constant voltage gradient of 0.83 V/cm for 20 days. Results indicated that the physicochemical changes caused by the electroremidiation process on the soil microbial population (actinomycetes and gram-positive and negative bacteria), soil respiration and microbial biomass were significant (p < 0.01). At the commencement of the study, soil microbial activity was reduced, due to physicochemical changes in pH, amount of moisture and the changes in the levels of heavy metals in the soil. The greatest reduction on the microbial activity was close to the cathode where high levels of heavy metal concentrations and high pH were demonstrated. The metabolic quotient index [qCO2] was used to achieve a more refined evaluation, compared to analysis of soil respiration and microbial biomass alone. Accordingly, high amounts of qCO2 near the cathode show the unfavorable living conditions of such microorganisms in these sections.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol 27:2638–2647
Aciego Pietri J, Brookes P (2009) Substrate inputs and pH as factors controlling microbial biomass, activity and community structure in an arable soil. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1396–1405
Alef K, Nannipieri P (1995) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic press, London
Anderson T-H, Domsch K (1990) Application of eco-physiological quotients (qCO2 and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biol Biochem 22:251–255
Anderson T-H, Domsch KH (2010) Soil microbial biomass: the eco-physiological approach. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2039–2043
Benintende SM, Benintende MC, Sterren MA, De Battista JJ (2008) Soil microbiological indicators of soil quality in four rice rotations systems. Ecol Indic 8:704–708
Brookes P, Heijnen CE, McGrath S, Vance E (1986) Soil microbial biomass estimates in soils contaminated with metals. Soil Biol Biochem 18:383–388
Cang L, Zhou D-M, Wang Q-Y, Wu D-Y (2009) Effects of electrokinetic treatment of a heavy metal contaminated soil on soil enzyme activities. J Hazard Mater 172:1602–1607
Cang L, Zhou D-M, Wang Q-Y, Fan G-P (2012) Impact of electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil on its physicochemical properties, enzymatic and microbial activities. Electrochim Acta 86:41–48
Das S, Ram S, Sahu H, Rao D, Chakraborty A, Sudarshan M, Thatoi H (2013) A study on soil physico-chemical, microbial and metal content in Sukinda chromite mine of Odisha, India. Environ Earth Sci 69:2487–2497
El-Azeem SAA, Ahmad M, Usman AR, Kim K-R, Oh S-E, Lee SS, Ok YS (2013) Changes of biochemical properties and heavy metal bioavailability in soil treated with natural liming materials. Environ Earth Sci 70:3411–3420
Hillel D (1980) Fundamentals of soil physics. Academic Press Inc, Ltd, London
Iskandar IK (2000) Environmental restoration of metals-contaminated soils. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Järup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull 68:167–182. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg032
Jesußek A, Grandel S, Dahmke A (2013) Impacts of subsurface heat storage on aquifer hydrogeochemistry. Environ Earth Sci 69:1999–2012
Jia Y, Maurice C, Öhlander B (2014) Effect of the alkaline industrial residues fly ash, green liquor dregs, and lime mud on mine tailings oxidation when used as covering material. Environ Earth Sci 72:319–334
Khan M, Scullion J (2000) Effect of soil on microbial responses to metal contamination. Environ Pollut 110:115–125
Khan S, Cao Q, Hesham AE-L, Xia Y, He J-Z (2007) Soil enzymatic activities and microbial community structure with different application rates of Cd and Pb. J Environ Sci 19:834–840
Khan S, Cao Q, Zheng Y, Huang Y, Zhu Y (2008) Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 152:686–692
Kieft TL, Rosacker LL (1991) Application of respiration-and adenylate-based soil microbiological assays to deep subsurface terrestrial sediments. Soil Biol Biochem 23:563–568
Kim S-H, Han H-Y, Lee Y-J, Kim CW, Yang J-W (2010) Effect of electrokinetic remediation on indigenous microbial activity and community within diesel contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 408:3162–3168
Kwasniewska J, Nałęcz-Jawecki G, Skrzypczak A, Płaza G, Matejczyk M (2012) An assessment of the genotoxic effects of landfill leachates using bacterial and plant tests. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 75:55–62
Lear G, Harbottle MJ, Van Der Gast C, Jackman S, Knowles C, Sills G, Thompson I (2004) The effect of electrokinetics on soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1751–1760
Lear G, Harbottle MJ, Sills G, Knowles C, Semple KT, Thompson I (2007) Impact of electrokinetic remediation on microbial communities within PCP contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 146:139–146
Li T, Guo S, Wu B, Li F, Niu Z (2010) Effect of electric intensity on the microbial degradation of petroleum pollutants in soil. J Environ Sci 22:1381–1386
Li D, Tan X-Y, Wu X-D, Pan C, Xu P (2014) Effects of electrolyte characteristics on soil conductivity and current in electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil. Sep Purif Technol 135:14–21
Li T, Guo S, Wu B, Zhang L, Gao Y (2015) Effect of polarity reversal and electrical intensity on the oil removal from soil. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 90(3):441–448. doi:10.1002/jctb.4312
Liao M, Chen C-L, Zeng L-S, Huang C-Y (2007) Influence of lead acetate on soil microbial biomass and community structure in two different soils with the growth of Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis). Chemosphere 66:1197–1205
Moore J, Klose S, Tabatabai M (2000) Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 31:200–210
Muscolo A, Panuccio MR, Mallamaci C, Sidari M (2014) Biological indicators to assess short-term soil quality changes in forest ecosystems. Ecol Indic 45:416–423
Paramkusam BR, Srivastava RK, Mohan D (2015) Electrokinetic removal of mixed heavy metals from a contaminated low permeable soil by surfactant and chelants. Environ Earth Sci 73(3):1191–1204
Pazos M, Plaza A, Martín M, Lobo M (2012) The impact of electrokinetic treatment on a loamy-sand soil properties. Chem Eng J 183:231–237
Peng C, Almeira JO, Gu Q (2013) Effect of electrode configuration on pH distribution and heavy metal ions migration during soil electrokinetic remediation. Environ Earth Sci 69:257–265
Pula G et al (2009) Proteomics identifies thymidine phosphorylase as a key regulator of the angiogenic potential of colony-forming units and endothelial progenitor cell cultures. Circ Res 104:32–40
Reddy KR, Cameselle C (2009) Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater. Wiley, New York
Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S (1999) Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils under reducing environments. Waste Manag 19:269–282
Richards BK, Steenhuis TS, Peverly JH, McBride MB (1998) Metal mobility at an old, heavily loaded sludge application site. Environ Pollut 99:365–377
Rozas F, Castellote M (2012) Electrokinetic remediation of dredged sediments polluted with heavy metals with different enhancing electrolytes. Electrochim Acta 86:102–109
Smith J, Paul E (1990) The significance of soil microbial biomass estimations. Soil Biochem 6:357–396
Sparks D, Page A, Helmke P, Loeppert R (1996) Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids, chap 14. In: Methods of soil analysis: chemical methods, part 3. SSSA Book Series no 5. Soil Science Society of America, pp 417–420
Tiehm A, Lohner ST, Augenstein T (2009) Effects of direct electric current and electrode reactions on vinyl chloride degrading microorganisms. Electrochim Acta 54:3453–3459
Vance E, Brookes P, Jenkinson D (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707
Virkutyte J, Sillanpää M, Latostenmaa P (2002) Electrokinetic soil remediation—critical overview. Sci Total Environ 289:97–121
Wang Y, Shi J, Wang H, Lin Q, Chen X, Chen Y (2007) The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper smelter. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67:75–81
Wang Q-Y, Zhou D-M, Cang L, Li L-Z, Wang P (2009) Solid/solution Cu fractionations/speciation of a Cu contaminated soil after pilot-scale electrokinetic remediation and their relationships with soil microbial and enzyme activities. Environ Pollut 157:2203–2208
Wick LY et al (2010) Responses of soil microbial communities to weak electric fields. Sci Total Environ 408:4886–4893
Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecol 2011. doi:10.5402/2011/402647
Yang L, Chen Z, Liu T, Jiang J, Li B, Chen S, Zhang J (2014) Soil respiratory and enzyme activities in leachate-contaminated soils with different application rate of cow manure compost: a laboratory study. Environ Earth Sci 71:225–231
Zhou D-M, Cang L, Alshawabkeh AN, Wang Y-J, Hao X-Z (2006) Pilot-scale electrokinetic treatment of a Cu contaminated red soil. Chemosphere 63:964–971
Zhou Y et al (2009) A combination method to study microbial communities and activities in zinc contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 169:875–881
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bahemmat, M., Farahbakhsh, M. & Shabani, F. Compositional and metabolic quotient analysis of heavy metal contaminated soil after electroremediation. Environ Earth Sci 74, 4639–4648 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4429-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4429-0