Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 463–477 | Cite as

Suitability of ANN applied as a hydrological model coupled with statistical downscaling model: a case study in the northern area of Peninsular Malaysia

  • Zulkarnain Hassan
  • Supiah Shamsudin
  • Sobri Harun
  • Marlinda Abdul Malek
  • Nuramidah Hamidon
Original Article

Abstract

The increase in global surface temperature in response to the changing composition of the atmosphere will significantly impact upon local hydrological regimes and water resources. This situation will then lead to the need for an assessment of regional climate change impacts. The objectives of this study are to determine current and future climate change scenarios using statistical downscaling model (SDSM) and to assess climate change impact on river runoff using artificial neural network (ANN) and identification of unit hydrographs and component flows from rainfall, evaporation and streamflow data (IHACRES) models, respectively. This study investigates the potential of ANN to project future runoff influenced by large-scale atmospheric variables for selected watershed in Peninsular Malaysia. In this study, simulations of general circulation models from Hadley Centre 3rd generation with A2 and B2 scenarios have been used. According to the SDSM projection, daily rainfall and temperature during the 2080s will increase by up to 2.23 mm and 2.02 °C, respectively. Moreover, river runoff corresponding to downscaled future projections presented a maximum increase in daily river runoff of 52 m3/s. The result revealed that the ANN was able to capture the observed runoff, as well as the IHACRES. However, compared to the IHACRES model, the ANN model was unable to provide an identical trend for daily and annual runoff series.

Keywords

Statistical downscaling IHACRES Artificial neural network River runoff Malaysia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author is grateful to Universiti Malaysia Perlis and the Ministry of Education Malaysia for the opportunity of study leave at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Thanks are also extended to the Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia for providing the data and technical support.

References

  1. Nakićenović N et al (2000) Emissions scenarios. A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard B, Vincent K, Frank M, Anthony E (2013) Comparison of extreme weather events and streamflow from drought indices and a hydrological model in River Malaba, Eastern Uganda. Int J Environ Stud 70(6):940–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chu JT, Xia J, Xu CY, Singh VP (2010) Statistical downscaling of daily mean temperature, pan evaporation and precipitation for climate change scenarios in Haihe River, China. Theoret Appl Climatol 99(1–2):149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Combalicer E, Cruz R, Lee S (2010) Assessing climate change impacts on water balance in the Mount Makiling forest, Philippines. J Earth Syst 3:265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coulibaly P, Dibike YB (2005) Downscaling precipitation and temperature with temporal neural networks. J Hydrometeorol 6:483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croke BFW, Jakeman AJ (2004) A catchment moisture deficit module for the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. Environ Model Softw 19:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croke BFW, Andrews F, Jakeman AJ, Cuddy SM, Luddy A (2006) IHACRES classic plus: a redesign of the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. Environ Model Softw 21:426–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson CW, Wilby RL (2001) Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Prog Phys Geogr 25(1):80–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dibike YB, Coulibaly P (2005) Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. J Hydrol 307(1–4):145–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dibike YB, Solomatine DP (2001) River flow forecasting using artificial neural networks. Phys Chem Earth B Hydrol Oceans Atmos 26(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fealy R, Sweeney J (2007) Statistical downscaling of precipitation for a selection of sites in Ireland employing a generalised linear modelling approach. Int J Climatol 27(15):2083–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson JK, Kallberg P, Uppala S, Hernandez A, Nomura A, Serrano E (1999) ECMWF re-analysis project report series. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordon C, Cooper C et al (2000) The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre Coupled Model without flux adjustments. Clim Dyn 16(2):147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta A, Singh Y (2011) Analysis of feature recognition of neural network method in the string recognition. In: Nagamalai D, Renault E, Dhanuskodi M (eds) Advances in parallel distributed computing SE-62. Communications in computer and information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 638–647. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24037-9_62 Google Scholar
  15. Hassaballa AA, Matori AB (2011) The estimation of air temperature from NOAA/AVHRR images and the study of NDVI-Ts impact. Case study: the application of split-window algorithms over (Perak Tengah and Manjong) area, Malaysia. In: Proceeding of the 2011 IEEE international conference on space science and communication (IconSpace) 12–13 July 2011, Penang, Malaysia, pp 20–24Google Scholar
  16. Hassan Z, Harun S (2012) Application of statistical downscaling model for long lead rainfall prediction in Kurau River catchment of Malaysia. Malays J Civil Eng 24(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassan Z, Shamsudin S, Harun S (2014a) Application of SDSM and LARS-WG for simulating and downscaling of rainfall and temperature. Theoret Appl Climatol 116(1–2):243–257. doi: 10.1007/s00704-013-0951-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hassan Z, Shamsudin S, Harun S (2014b) Minimum input variances for modelling rainfall-runoff using ANN. Jurnal Teknologi (Sci Eng) 69(3):113–118Google Scholar
  19. Hsu KL, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1995) Artificial neural network modelling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour Res 31(10):2517–2530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang T, Chen YD, Xu C, Chen X, Singh VP (2007) Comparison of hydrological impacts of climate change simulated by six hydrological models in the Dongjiang Basin, South China. J Hydrol 336:316–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaas E, Frich P (1995) Diurnal temperature range and cloud cover in the Nordic countries: observed trends and estimates for the future. Atmos Res 37:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kabiri R, Bai VR, Chan A (2014) Assessment of hydrologic impacts of climate change on the runoff trend in Klang Watershed. Environ Earth Sci, Malaysia. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3392-5 Google Scholar
  23. Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karamouz M, Fallahi M, Nazif S, Rahimi Farahani M (2012) Long lead runoff simulation using data-driven models. Int J Civil Eng 10(4):328–336Google Scholar
  25. Kendall M (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan MS, Coulibaly P, Dibike Y (2006) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling methods. J Hydrol 319(1–4):357–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kokkonen T, Jakeman AJ, Young PC, Koivusalo HJ (2003) Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina. Hydrol Process 11:2219–2238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee E, Seong C, Kim H, Park S, Kang M (2010) Predicting the impacts of climate change on nonpoint source pollutant loads from agricultural small watershed using artificial neural network. J Environ Sci 22(6):840–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Littlewood IG, Down K, Parker JR, Post DA (1997) IHACRES—catchment-scale rainfall-streamflow modelling (PC version) Version 1.0: April 1997. The Australian National University, Institute of Hydrology and Centre for Ecology and HydrologyGoogle Scholar
  30. Minns AW, Hall MJ (1996) Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Sci J 41(3):399–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MMD (2009) Scientific report: climate change scenarios for Malaysia. Jalan Sultan, Petaling Jaya. http://www.met.gov.my/images/pdf/nwp/climate-scenarios.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2012
  32. Mollema P, Antonellini M (2012) Climate and water budget change of a Mediterranean coastal watershed, Ravenna, Italy. Environ Earth Sci 65:257–276. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1088-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nor N, Harun S, Kassim A (2007) Radial basis function modelling of hourly streamflow hydrograph. J Hydrol Eng 12(1):113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poccard I, Janicot S, Camberlin P (2000) Comparison of rainfall structures between NCEP/NCAR reanalyses and observed data over tropical Africa. Clim Dyn 16(12):897–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Puka L (2011) Kendall’s tau. In: Lovric M (ed) International encyclopedia of statistical science SE-324. Springer, Berlin, pp 713–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Samadi S, Carbone GJ, Mahdavi M, Sharifi F, Bihamta MR (2012) Statistical downscaling of climate data to estimate streamflow in a semi-arid catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 9(4):4869–4918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Samadi S, Carbone GJ, Mahdavi M, Sharifi F, Bihamta MR (2013) Statistical downscaling of river runoff in a semi-arid catchment. Water Resour Manage 27:117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tokar AS, Johnson PA (1999) Rainfall runoff modelling using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Eng 4(3):232–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tukimat NNA, Harun S, Shahid S (2012) Comparison of different methods in estimating potential evapotranspiration at Muda Irrigation Scheme of Malaysia. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 113(1):77–85Google Scholar
  41. Wilby RL (2005) Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment. Hydrol Process 19(16):3201–3219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2013) The statistical downscaling model: insights from one decade of application. Int J Climatol 33(7):1707–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilby RL, Harris I (2006) A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK. Water Resour Res 42(2):W02419. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilby RL, Wigley TML (1997) Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr 21:530–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilby RL, Dawson CW, Barrow EM (2002) SDSM—a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ Model Softw 17:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu CY (1999) From GCMs to river flow: a review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modelling approaches. Prog Phys Geogr 23(2):229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ye W, Bates BC, Viney NR, Sivapalan M, Jakeman AJ (1997) Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding ephemeral catchment. Water Resour Res 33:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zadeh MR, Amin S, Khalili D, Singh VP (2010) Daily outflow prediction by multi-layer perceptron with logistic sigmoid and tangent sigmoid activation. Water Resour Manage 24(11):2673–2688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zareian MJ, Eslamian S, Hosseinipour EZ (2014) Climate change impacts on reservoir inflow using various weighting approaches. World Environ Water Resour Congr 2014:2136–2145. doi: 10.1061/9780784413548.213 Google Scholar
  50. Zarghami M, Abdi A, Babaeian I (2011) Impacts of climate change on runoffs in East Azerbaijan, Iran. Global Planet Change 78(3–4):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang GP, Savenije HHG (2005) Rainfall-runoff modelling in a catchment with a complex groundwater flow system: application of the Representative Elementary Watershed (REW) approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:243–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zulkarnain Hassan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Supiah Shamsudin
    • 3
  • Sobri Harun
    • 1
  • Marlinda Abdul Malek
    • 4
  • Nuramidah Hamidon
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil Engineering (FKA)Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)SkudaiMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Environmental EngineeringUniversiti Malaysia PerlisArauMalaysia
  3. 3.Razak School of Engineering and Advanced TechnologyUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia-Kuala LumpurKuala LumpurMalaysia
  4. 4.Department of Civil Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations