Removal of arsenic from groundwater in West Bengal, India using CuO nanoparticle adsorbent
Arsenic contamination in drinking water is a worldwide health crisis. Treatment of arsenic laden water in areas of the world such as West Bengal, India has proven to be an extremely difficult task. Practical and reliable treatment technologies that can overcome the socioeconomic and geochemical barriers present in these areas of the world must be developed. Cupric Oxide (CuO) nanoparticles have shown promising characteristics as a sorbent to remove arsenic from water. Presented in this study is, to our knowledge, the first time CuO nanoparticles have been used to treat groundwater from West Bengal that is naturally high in arsenic. Batch experiments were conducted by reacting CuO nanoparticles with sixteen groundwater samples from West Bengal that exceed 10 µg/L. All samples showed near complete removal of arsenic following the treatment with CuO nanoparticles. The removal of arsenic was unaffected by the presence of high concentrations of competing ions such as bicarbonate (HCO3 −), phosphate (PO4 3−), and sulfate (SO4 2−). The CuO nanoparticle treatment showed no major affect on other water constituents. Overall, the results of this study suggest that CuO nanoparticles show potential as an effective sorbent of arsenic under diverse geochemical makeups.
KeywordsArsenic removal Arsenic contamination Arsenate Arsenite Arsenic toxicity CuO sorbent
The authors would like to thank the University of Wyoming and Jawaharlal Nehru University for providing the facilities and resources used in this research.
- APHA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 1965, 21Google Scholar
- BGS, DPHE (2001) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. In: Kinniburgh DG, Smedley PL (eds) British geological survey technical report WC/00/19. British Geological Survey, KeyworthGoogle Scholar
- Chakraborti D, Das B, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Biswas B, Goswami AB, Nayak B, Pal A, Sengupta MK, Ahamed S, Hossain A, Basu G, Roychowdhury T, Das D (2009) Status of groundwater arsenic contamination in the state of West Bengal, India: a 20-year study report. Mol Nutr Food Res 53(5):542–551. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200700517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chakraborti D, Mohammad MR, Das B, Nayak B, Pal A, Sengupta MK, Hossain MA, Ahamed S, Sahu M, Saha KC, Mukherjee SC, Pati S, Dutta RN, Quamruzzaman Q (2013) Groundwater arsenic contamination in Ganga-Meghna-Brahmaputra plain, its health effects and an approach for mitigation. Environ Earth Sci 70(5):1993–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gustaffson JP (2011) Visual MINTEQ. 3.0Google Scholar
- Ledwith M (2002) Land cover classification using SPOT Vegetation 10-day composite imagesâ€“Baltic Sea catchment basinGoogle Scholar
- Reddy K, Attili V (2005) How to Remove Arsenic from Water. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Annual Meeting abstractsGoogle Scholar
- Reddy KJ (2007) Method for Removing Arsenic from Water. US Patent No, 7,235,179. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
- Reddy KJ (2011) U.S. Patent No, 7,897,052. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
- Roth TR, Reddy K (2005) Regional assessment of arsenic in domestic wells of small communitiesGoogle Scholar
- Siegel M, McConnell P, Ilges A, Chen HW, Ghassemi A, Thompson R (2007) Development and evaluation of innovative arsenic adsorption technologies for drinking water by the arsenic water technology partnership (SAND2006-0113C)Google Scholar