Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 73, Issue 7, pp 3593–3601 | Cite as

Removal of arsenic from groundwater in West Bengal, India using CuO nanoparticle adsorbent

  • Kyle J. McDonald
  • K. J. Reddy
  • Neha Singh
  • Ravi Prakash Singh
  • Saumitra Mukherjee
Original Article

Abstract

Arsenic contamination in drinking water is a worldwide health crisis. Treatment of arsenic laden water in areas of the world such as West Bengal, India has proven to be an extremely difficult task. Practical and reliable treatment technologies that can overcome the socioeconomic and geochemical barriers present in these areas of the world must be developed. Cupric Oxide (CuO) nanoparticles have shown promising characteristics as a sorbent to remove arsenic from water. Presented in this study is, to our knowledge, the first time CuO nanoparticles have been used to treat groundwater from West Bengal that is naturally high in arsenic. Batch experiments were conducted by reacting CuO nanoparticles with sixteen groundwater samples from West Bengal that exceed 10 µg/L. All samples showed near complete removal of arsenic following the treatment with CuO nanoparticles. The removal of arsenic was unaffected by the presence of high concentrations of competing ions such as bicarbonate (HCO3 ), phosphate (PO4 3−), and sulfate (SO4 2−). The CuO nanoparticle treatment showed no major affect on other water constituents. Overall, the results of this study suggest that CuO nanoparticles show potential as an effective sorbent of arsenic under diverse geochemical makeups.

Keywords

Arsenic removal Arsenic contamination Arsenate Arsenite Arsenic toxicity CuO sorbent 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Wyoming and Jawaharlal Nehru University for providing the facilities and resources used in this research.

References

  1. Anawar HM, Akai J, Mostofa KMG, Safiullah S, Tareq SM (2002) Arsenic poisoning in groundwater: health risk and geochemical sources in Bangladesh. Environ Int 27(7):597–604. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00116-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 1965, 21Google Scholar
  3. Berg M, Stengel C, Trang PTK, Hung Viet P, Sampson ML, Leng M, Samreth S, Fredericks D (2007) Magnitude of arsenic pollution in the Mekong and Red River Deltas—Cambodia and Vietnam. Sci Total Environ 372(2):413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BGS, DPHE (2001) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. In: Kinniburgh DG, Smedley PL (eds) British geological survey technical report WC/00/19. British Geological Survey, KeyworthGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakraborti D (2011) Arsenic: occurrence in groundwater. In: Jerome ÂÂ, Nriagu O (eds) Encyclopedia of environmental health. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakraborti D, Das B, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Biswas B, Goswami AB, Nayak B, Pal A, Sengupta MK, Ahamed S, Hossain A, Basu G, Roychowdhury T, Das D (2009) Status of groundwater arsenic contamination in the state of West Bengal, India: a 20-year study report. Mol Nutr Food Res 53(5):542–551. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200700517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakraborti D, Mohammad MR, Das B, Nayak B, Pal A, Sengupta MK, Hossain MA, Ahamed S, Sahu M, Saha KC, Mukherjee SC, Pati S, Dutta RN, Quamruzzaman Q (2013) Groundwater arsenic contamination in Ganga-Meghna-Brahmaputra plain, its health effects and an approach for mitigation. Environ Earth Sci 70(5):1993–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiew H, Sampson M, Huch S, Ken S, Bostick BC (2009) Effect of groundwater iron and phosphate on the efficacy of arsenic removal by iron-amended BioSand filters. Environ Sci Technol 43(16):6295–6300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chowdhury UK, Biswas BK, Chowdhury TR, Samanta G, Mandal BK, Basu GC, Chanda CR, Lodh D, Saha KC, Mukherjee SK (2000) Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India. Environ Health Perspect 108(5):393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chowdhury SR, Yanful EK, Pratt AR (2011) Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by mixed magnetite-maghemite nanoparticles. Environ Earth Sci 64(2):411423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. George CM, Zheng Y, Graziano J, Hossain Z, Rasul SB, Mey J, Van Geen A (2012) Evaluation of an arsenic test kit for rapid well screening in Bangladesh. Environ Sci Technol 46(20):11213–11219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gustaffson JP (2011) Visual MINTEQ. 3.0Google Scholar
  13. Jain A, Loeppert RH (2000) Effect of competing anions on the adsorption of arsenate and arsenite by ferrihydrite. J Environ Qual 29(5):1422–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnston RB, Hanchett S, Khan MH (2010) The socio-economics of arsenic removal. Nat Geosci 3(1):2–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ledwith M (2002) Land cover classification using SPOT Vegetation 10-day composite images–Baltic Sea catchment basinGoogle Scholar
  16. Lunetta RS, Knight JF, Ediriwickrema J, Lyon JG, Worthy LD (2006) Land-cover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data. Remote Sens Environ 105(2):142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinson CA, Reddy K (2009) Adsorption of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) by cupric oxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 336(2):406–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masscheleyn PH, Delaune RD, Patrick WH Jr (1991) Effect of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 25(8):1414–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meng X, Bang S, Korfiatis GP (2000) Effects of silicate, sulfate, and carbonate on arsenic removal by ferric chloride. Water Res 34(4):1255–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohan D, Pittman CU (2007) Arsenic removal from water/waste water using adsorbents: a critical review. J Hazard Mater 142(1–2):1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mukherjee S (2008) Role of satellite sensors in groundwater exploration. Sensors 8(3):2006–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pan WC, Seow WJ, Kile ML, Hoffman EB, Quamruzzaman Q, Rahman M, Mahiuddin G, Mostofa G, Lu Q, Christiani DC (2013) Association of low to moderate levels of arsenic exposure with risk of type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol 178(10):1563–1570. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pazand K, Javanshir AR (2013) Hydrogeochemistry and arsenic contamination of groundwater in the Rayen area, southeastern Iran. Environ Earth Sci 70(6):2633–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petrini R, Slejko F, Lutman A, Pison S, Franceschini G, Zini L, Italiano F, Galic A (2011) Natural arsenic contamination in waters from the Pesariis village. NE Italy. Environmental Earth Sciences 62(3):481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rahman MM, Ng JC, Naidu R (2009) Chronic exposure of arsenic via drinking water and its adverse health impacts on humans. Environ Geochem Health 31:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reddy K, Attili V (2005) How to Remove Arsenic from Water. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Annual Meeting abstractsGoogle Scholar
  27. Reddy KJ (2007) Method for Removing Arsenic from Water. US Patent No, 7,235,179. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  28. Reddy KJ (2011) U.S. Patent No, 7,897,052. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
  29. Reddy K, Roth T (2012) Arsenic removal from natural groundwater using cupric oxide. Ground Water. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00926.x Google Scholar
  30. Reddy K, McDonald K, King H (2013) A novel arsenic removal process for water using cupric oxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 397:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodrí-guez-Lado L, Sun G, Berg M, Zhang Q, Xue H, Zheng Q, Johnson CA (2013) Groundwater arsenic contamination throughout china. Science 341(6148):866–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roth TR, Reddy K (2005) Regional assessment of arsenic in domestic wells of small communitiesGoogle Scholar
  33. Shafiquzzaman M, Azam MS, Mishima I, Nakajima J (2009) Technical and social evaluation of arsenic mitigation in rural Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 27(5):674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegel M, McConnell P, Ilges A, Chen HW, Ghassemi A, Thompson R (2007) Development and evaluation of innovative arsenic adsorption technologies for drinking water by the arsenic water technology partnership (SAND2006-0113C)Google Scholar
  35. Singh N, Singh RP, Mukherjee S, McDonald KJ, Reddy KJ (2013) Hydro-geological processes controlling the release of arsenic in part of 24 Parganas district West Bengal. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2940-8 Google Scholar
  36. Welch AH, Westjohn D, Helsel DR, Wanty RB (2005) Arsenic in ground water of the United States: occurrence and geochemistry. Ground Water 38(4):589–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winkel L, Berg M, Amini M, Hug SJ, Johnson CA (2008) Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination in Southeast Asia from surface parameters. Nat Geosci 1(8):536–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yoon RH, Salman T, Donnay G (1979) Predicting points of zero charge of oxides and hydroxides. J Colloid Interface Sci 70(3):483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang G, Li X, Wu S, Gu P (2012) Effect of source water quality on arsenic (V) removal from drinking water by coagulation/microfiltration. Environ Earth Sci 66(4):1269–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyle J. McDonald
    • 1
  • K. J. Reddy
    • 1
  • Neha Singh
    • 2
  • Ravi Prakash Singh
    • 2
  • Saumitra Mukherjee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecosystem Science and ManagementUniversity of WyomingLaramie WyomingUSA
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations