Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing detail of distributed runoff modeling using fuzzy logic in curve number

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number runoff model is widely used in runoff prediction and has been incorporated into many software packages for watershed modeling. The Curve Number (CN) is the key parameter in the model, but it is largely dependent on Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) classifications which may induce aggregation of detailed soil information. However, little attention and efforts have been paid to reduce such aggregation effect for retaining those valuable soil information to derive more detailed CN. This study proposed to integrate fuzzy logic to derive detailed CN. Membership of a given soil to each HSG is first calculated based on soil properties and HSG classification criteria; then, detailed and continuous CN is derived using the membership as weight for CN of each soil-cover complex. The proposed approach was incorporated into an automation system and its further effects on runoff modeling were examined. A case study shows fuzzy CN possesses more spatial details and leads to obvious spatial differences of simulated runoff. The developed system could also be used to detect inconsistency of HSG placements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burrough PA (1989) Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. Eur J Soil Sci 40:477–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhakeem M, Papanicolaou A (2009) Estimation of the runoff curve number via direct rainfall simulator measurements in the state of Iowa, USA. Water Resour Manag 23(12):2455–2473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmfelt AT, Woodward DA, Conaway G, Quan QD, Mullem JV, Hawkins RH (2001) Curve Numbers, Recent Developments. In: Proceedings of the 29th IAHR Congress, Beijing, China. pp 285–291

  • Li RK, Zhu AX, Song XF, Li BL, Pei T, Qin CZ (2012) Effects of spatial aggregation of soil spatial information on watershed hydrological modelling. Hydrol Process 26(9):1390–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM, Csillag F (1989) The nature of boundaries on ‘area-class’ maps. Cartographica 26(1):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuen RH (2004) Hydrologic analysis and design, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Sahu R, Eldho T, Jain M (2006) An improved ia-s relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Water Resour Manag 20(5):643–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Jain M, Suresh Babu P, Venugopal K, Kaliappan S (2008) Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion formulae. Water Resour Manag 22(10):1409–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave GW (1955) How much of the rain enters the soil? US Department of Agriculture, Yearbook of Agriculture: Water. US Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 151–159

  • Nielson RD, Hjelmfelt AT (1998) Hydrologic soil-group assignment. In: Abt SR, Young-Pezeshk J, Watson CC (eds) Water Resource Engineering 98. In: Proceedings of the International Water Resources Engineering Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, pp 1297–1302

  • Ponce VM, Hawkins RH (1996) Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? J Hydrol Eng 1(1):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MT (2001) ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol 251(3–4):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirmohammadi A, Yoon KS, Rawls WJ, Smith OH (1997) Evaluation of curve number procedures to predict runoff in GLEAMS. J Am Water Resour Assoc 33(5):1069–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Conservation Service (1972) National Engineering Handbook. Section 4: Hydrology. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC

  • Soil Survey Division Staff (1993) Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2004) National Engineering Handbook, 210-VI. Part 630, chapter 9, Hydrologic Soil-Cover Complexes. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC

  • USDA (2007) National Engineering Handbook, title 210-VI. Part 630, chapter 7, Hydrologic Soil Groups. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC

  • Van Mullem JA (1991) Runoff and peak discharges using green-ampt infiltration model. J Hydrol Eng 117(3):354–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Mullem JA, Woodward DE, Hawkins RH, Hjelmfelt AT Jr (2002) Runoff curve number method: beyond the handbook. Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Ye XC, Zhang Q, Viney NR (2011) The effect of soil data resolution on hydrological processes modelling in a large humid watershed. Hydrol Process 25(1):130–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young DF, Carleton JN (2006) Implementation of a probabilistic curve number method in the PRZM runoff model. Environ Model Softw 21:1172–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai H, Benson C (2006) The log-normal distribution for hydraulic conductivity of compacted clays: two or three parameters? Geotech Geol Eng 24(5):1149–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu AX (1997) A similarity model for representing soil spatial information. Geoderma 77:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu AX, Band L, Vertessy R, Dutton B (1997) Derivation of soil properties using a soil land inference model (SoLIM). Soil Sci Soc Am J 61(2):523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu AX, Hudson B, Burt JE, Lubich K, Simonson D (2001) Soil mapping using GIS, expert knowledge, and fuzzy logic. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(5):1463–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciated very much the anonymous reviewers for their valuable instructive comments in revising the manuscript. We thank Mingsi Xie from Research Laboratory for Conservation and Archaeology of Shanghai Museum who contributed discussions and help improve the language. This study is supported by the Key Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. KZZD-EW-13), National Water Pollution Control and Management Technology Major Project (2013ZX07103006-005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 41201038 and 41023010), and is also supported by Chinese Academy of Sciences visiting professorship for senior international scientists (Grant No. 2012T1Z0039).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianfeng Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, R., Rui, X., Zhu, AX. et al. Increasing detail of distributed runoff modeling using fuzzy logic in curve number . Environ Earth Sci 73, 3197–3205 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3620-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3620-z

Keywords

Navigation