Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 375–386 | Cite as

Assessment of hydrogeochemistry and the quality of groundwater in 24-Parganas districts, West Bengal

  • Neha Singh
  • Ravi Prakash Singh
  • Vikas Kamal
  • Ratan Sen
  • Saumitra MukherjeeEmail author
Original Article


Hydrogeochemistry of an area helps in understanding the geological processes which control the chemistry of water and play an important role in determining the suitability of groundwater for various purposes. In the present study, an attempt has been made to understand the geological processes controlling the quality of water in a part of North and South 24-Parganas districts of West Bengal. 39 representative groundwater samples were collected from the study area and physico-chemical parameters were analyzed for all the samples. Schoeller and Durov diagram were used to understand the hydrochemical nature of water. Results obtained from water chemistry were used in the interpretation of controlling processes using different conventional graphs, and determining the quality of groundwater. Silicate weathering and ion exchange are the dominant processes controlling the chemistry of groundwater in the study area, where calcium and magnesium in the water are replaced by the sodium and potassium in the minerals from the host rock as chloro-alkaline indices are negative at most of the places. Saturation index was calculated to understand the mineralogy of the subsurface. The groundwater is oversaturated with iron containing minerals like Fe(OH)3, goethite, and hematite, while undersaturated with anhydrite and gypsum. The groundwater suitability was determined by calculating water quality index for drinking purpose; while SAR, and residual sodium carbonate indices for the agricultural purpose. The groundwater in the study area is not suitable for drinking, but can be used for other household use and in irrigation for agriculture.


Hydrochemical facies Silicate weathering Ion exchange Chloro-alkaline indices Saturation index 



Financial support as Senior Research fellowship provided by the University Grant Commission is duly acknowledged. The author is also thankful to Jawaharlal Nehru University for providing various research facilities.


  1. Acharyya SK, Chackraborty P, Lahiri S, Raymahashay BC, Guha S, Bhowmik A (1999) Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges delta. Nat 401:545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acheampong SY, Hess JW (1998) Hydrogeological and hydrochemical framework of the shallow groundwater system in the southern Voltaian sedimentary basin, Ghana. J Hydrogeol 6:527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Asadi SS, Vuppala P, Reddy MA (2007) Remote sensing and GIS techniques for evaluation of groundwater quality in municipal corporation of Hyderabad (Zone-V), India. Int J Environ Res and Public Heal 4(1):45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avvannavar SM, Shrihari S (2008) Evaluation of water quality index for drinking purposes for river Netravathi, Mangalore, South India. Environ Monit Assess 143:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyacioglu H (2007) Development of a water quality index based on a European classification scheme. Water SA 33(1):101–106Google Scholar
  7. Chakraborti D, Das D, Samanta BK, Mandal BK, Chowdhury T, Chanda CR, Chowdhury PP, Basu GK (1996) Arsenic in groundwater in six districts of West Bengal, India. Environ Geochem Health 18:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chetia M, Chatterjee S, Banerjee S, Nath MJ, Singh L, Srivastava RB, Sarma HP (2011) Groundwater arsenic contamination in Brahmaputra river basin: a water quality assessment in Golaghat (Assam), India. Environ Monit Assess 173:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das D, Chatterjee A, Mandal BK, Samanta G, Chakraborty D, Chanda B (1995) Arsenic in groundwater in six districts of West Bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world, Part 2: Arsenic concentration in drinking water, hair, nails, urine, skin-scale and liver tissue (biopsy) of the affected people. Anal 120:917–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dasgupta AM, Purohit KM (2001) Status of surface and groundwater quality of Mandiakadar—Part II: agricultural utilities. Pollut Res 20(2):219–225Google Scholar
  11. Datta PS, Tyagi SK (1996) Major ion chemistry of groundwater of Delhi area: chemical weathering processes and groundwater flow regime. J Geol Soc India 47:179–188Google Scholar
  12. Datta PS, Bhattacharya SK, Tyagi SK (1996) 18O studies on recharge of phreatic aquifers and groundwater flow-paths of mixing in the Delhi area. J Hydrol 176:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deutsch WJ (1997) Groundwater geochemistry: fundamentals and application to contamination. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. Durov SA (1949) Treugolnaja forma graficeskogo vyrazenija rezultatov vodnych analizov I primenenije jejo k klassifikaciji prirodnych vod. Gidrochem.materialy 16:54Google Scholar
  15. Durvey VS, Sharma LL, Saini VP, Sharma BK (1997) Handbook on the methodology of water quality assessment. Rajasthan Agriculture University, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  16. Eaton EM (1950) Significance of carbonate in irrigation water. Soil Sci 69:12–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edmunds WM, Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Cardona A (2002) Geochemical evolution of groundwater beneath Mexico City. J Hydrol 258:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elangovan D, Chalakh ML (2006) Arsenic pollution in West Bengal. Tech Dig 9:31–35Google Scholar
  19. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  20. Giridharan L, Venugopal T, Jayaprakash M (2008) Evaluation of the seasonal variation on the geochemical parameters and quality assessment of the groundwater in the proximity of River Cooum, Chennai, India. Environ Monit Assess 143:161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Handa BK (1969) Description and classification of media for hydro-geochemical investigations. In: Symposium on ground water studies in arid and semiarid regions, RoorkeeGoogle Scholar
  22. Jameel A, Sirajudeen J (2006) Risk assessment of physico-chemical contaminants in groundwater of Pettavaithalai Area, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India. Environ Monit Assess 123:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karanth KR (1987) Groundwater assessment, development and management (pp720). Tata McGraw Hill, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  24. Khurshid SH, Hasan N, Zaheeruddin M (2002) Water quality status and environmental hazards in parts of Yamuna-Karwan sub-basin of Aligarh-Mathura district, Uttar Pradesh. India. J Appl Hydrol 14(4):30–37Google Scholar
  25. Kortatsi BK (2007) Hydrochemical framework of groundwater in the Ankobra Basin, Ghana. Aquat Geochem 13:41–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar M, Ramanathan AL, Rao MS, Kumar B (2006) Identification and evaluation of hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment of Delhi. Environ Geol 50:1025–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar M, Kumari K, Ramanathan AL, Saxena R (2007) A comparative evaluation of groundwater suitability for irrigation and drinking purposes in two intensively cultivated districts of Punjab, India. Environ Geol 53:553–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lakshmanan E, Kannan R, Senthil Kumar M (2003) Major ion chemistry and identification of hydrogeochemical processes of ground water in a part of Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu. India. Environ Geosci 10(4):157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leguey S, Leon DRD, Ruiz AI, Cueva J (2010) The role of biomineralization in the origin of sepiolite and dolomite. Am J Sci 310:165–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitra BK (1998) Spatial and temporal variation of ground water quality in sand dune area of aomori prefecture in Japan. 2006 ASAE Annual Meeting, Paper number 062023Google Scholar
  31. Mukherjee S, Kumar BA, Kortvelyessy L (2005) Assessment of Groundwater Quality in the South 24 Parganas, West Bengal Coast. India. J Environ Hydrol 13:15Google Scholar
  32. Mukherjee A, Bromssen MV, Scanlon BR, Bhattacharya P, Fryar AE, Hasan Md A, Ahmed KM, Chatterjee D, Jacks G, Sracek O (2008) Hydrogeochemical comparison and effects of overlapping redox zones on groundwater arsenic near the Western (Bhagirathi sub-basin, India) and Eastern (Meghna sub-basin, Bangladesh) margins of the Bengal Basin. J Contam Hydrol 99:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naik S, Purohit KM (2001) Studies on water quality of river Brahmani in Sundargarh district, Orissa. Ind J Environ and Ecoplanning 5(2):397–402Google Scholar
  34. Nickson R, McArthur J, Ravenscroft P, Burgess W, Ahmed KM (2000) Mechanism of arsenic poisoning of groundwater in Bangladesh and West Bengal. Appl Geochem 15:403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. PHED (1991) National drinking water mission: submission project on arsenic pollution in groundwater in West Bengal. Final Report by Steering Committee, Arsenic Investigation Project, Government of West Bengal 57Google Scholar
  36. Ragunath HM (1987) Groundwater. Wiley Eastern, New Delhi, p 563Google Scholar
  37. Rajmohan N, Elango L (2004) Identification and evolution of hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment in an area of the Palar and Cheyyar River Basins, Southern India. Environ Geol 46:47–61Google Scholar
  38. Ravikumar P, Somashekar RK, Angami M (2011) Hydrochemistry and evaluation of groundwater suitability for irrigation and drinking purposes in the Markandeya River basin, Belgaum District, Karnataka State, India. Environ Monit Assess 173:459–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline alkali soils: agriculture. vol 160, Handbook 60. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Rina K, Singh CK, Datta PS, Singh N, Mukherjee S (2013) Geochemical modelling, ionic ratio and GIS based mapping of groundwater salinity and assessment of governing processes in Northern Gujarat, India. Environ Earth Sci 69:2377–2391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarin MM, Krishnaswamy S, Dilli K, Somayajulu BLK, Moore WS (1989) Major ion chemistry of the Ganga- Brahmaputra river system: weathering processes and fluxes to the Bay of Bengal. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 53:997–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sastri JCV (1994) Groundwater chemical quality in river basins, hydrogeochemical modeling. In: Lecture notes—refresher course, School of Earth Sciences. Bharathidasan University, TiruchirapalliGoogle Scholar
  43. Schoeller H (1955) Geochimie des eaux souterraines application aux eaux de gisements de petrole; Revue Inst. Pet Et Ann Des Combust Liq 10(181–213):219–246Google Scholar
  44. Schoeller H (1965) Qualitative evaluation of groundwater resources. In Methods and techniques of groundwater investigations and development. UNESCO, pp 54–83Google Scholar
  45. Schoeller H (1967) Geochemistry of groundwater. An international guide for research and practice. UNESCO, Paris, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  46. Schoeller H (1977) Geochemistry of groundwater. Groundwater studies—an international guide for research and practice Ch 15. UNESCO, Paris, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  47. Singh N, Singh RP, Mukherjee S, McDonald K, Reddy KJ (2013) Hydrogeological processes controlling the release of arsenic in parts of 24 Parganas district, West Bengal. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2940-8 Google Scholar
  48. Stallard RF, Edmond JM (1983) Geochemistry of the Amazon, the influence of geology and weathering environment on the dissolved load. J Geophys Res 88:9671–9688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Subba Rao N (2006) Seasonal variation of groundwater quality in a part of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 49:413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Subba Rao N (2008) Factors controlling the salinity in groundwater in parts of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Monit Assess 138:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Subramani T, Elango L, Damodarasamy SR (2005) Groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in Chithar River Basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Geol 47:1099–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tiwari TN, Mishra MA (1985) A preliminary assignment of water quality index of major Indian rivers. Ind J Environ Protection 5:276–279Google Scholar
  53. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (1999) Global environment outlook 2000. Earthscan, UKGoogle Scholar
  54. WHO (1989) Health Guidelines for the use of wastewater in Agriculture and Aquaculture. Report of a WHO Scientific Group-Technical Report Series 778, Geneva: World Health Organization. p 74Google Scholar
  55. Yidana SM, Ophori D, Banoeng-Yakubo B (2008) Groundwater availability in the shallow aquifers of the southern Voltaian system: a simulation and chemical analysis. Environ Geol 55:1647–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yogendra K, Puttaiah ET (2008) Determination of water quality index and suitability of urban water body in Shimoga Town, Karnataka. In: The 12th world lake conference, pp 342–346Google Scholar
  57. Zuane JD (1990) Drinking water quality: Standards and control. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neha Singh
    • 1
  • Ravi Prakash Singh
    • 1
  • Vikas Kamal
    • 1
  • Ratan Sen
    • 1
  • Saumitra Mukherjee
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Environmental SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations