Skip to main content
Log in

The development, application and acceptance of environmental and health risk assessment methodology for MAR schemes in South Australia

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A risk assessment methodology for the establishment of Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) schemes has evolved in South Australia (SA) over the last 6 years. The methodology is based on the Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling and has been led by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) in close collaboration with the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), Department of Health and Aging (SA Health) and industry. MAR has been established in SA as a common practice over the last 20 years. Early Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) schemes were supported and initiated by DEWNR (in various guises) to explore viability and recharge depleting aquifers. Large areas of the Adelaide Plains, across where the state’s capital sprawls are underlain by a tertiary aquifer system that lends itself to MAR. Local councils and catchment boards embraced the practice and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Land and Water proceeded with an extensive programme of research and documentation of existing and emerging MAR practices. ASR of treated wastewater was trialled and a pilot scheme established by SA Water which is now operational. Early schemes were not rigorously regulated but up to five state agencies are now involved because of their legislative responsibilities. DEWNR regulates water quantity, EPA water quality and SA Health the impact of use on human health. Most of the legislation was written prior to MAR practices and has been applied adaptively providing confusion and frustration for developers and operators. MAR schemes have proved successful and the number continues to increase boosted over the last 10 years by federal government initiatives promoting the use of recycled water, funding support and an extended period of drought. The Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling: Managing Health and Environmental Risks 2006 and Phase 2 Guidelines were developed detailing a health and environmental risk assessment framework that could be applied to recycled water schemes including MAR. The risk assessment methodology follows a stepwise approach to examining the source water, the receiving aquifer and the end-use. The requirements for developers and operators have increased over time and the risk assessment processes are now embraced and a Draft MAR Guide has been developed. There has been a collaborative effort by the agencies involved to streamline the process and the risk assessment methodology is a key binding force. Industry acceptance has not been smooth, adaption of regulation is ongoing, monitoring has been inconsistent and unexpected technical and water quality issues continue to arise; however, there are number of loose ends remaining to be tied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquifer Storage and Recovery Potential of Fractured Rock Aquifers in the Golden Grove Embayment, Todd Hodgkin, Knowledge and Information Division, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation June 2006, Report DWLBC 2006/03

  • Environment Protection and Heritage Council (EPHC), the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council (NRMMC) and the Australian Health Ministers’ Conference (AHMC) 2006, National Water Quality Management Strategy, Australian Guidelines for water recycling: managing health and environmental risks (Phase 1)

  • Environment Protection Authority, Government of South Australia 2004, Code of Practice for Aquifer Storage and Recovery 2004

  • EPHC, NRMMC and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2008, Australian guidelines for water recycling: managing health and environmental risks (Phase 2): managed aquifer recharge

  • EPHC, NRMMC and NHMRC (2009) Australian guidelines for Water recycling: managing health and environmental risks (Phase 2): stormwater harvesting and reuse

  • EPHC, NRMMC and NHMRC (2009) Australian guidelines for water recycling: managing health and environmental risks (Phase 2): managed aquifer recharge

  • Government of South Australia (1993) Development Act 1993

  • Government of South Australia (1993) The Environment Protection Act 1993

  • Government of South Australia (2003) Environment Protection (water quality) Policy 2003

  • Government of South Australia (2004) Natural Resources Management Act 2004

  • Government of South Australia, Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board (2007) Water Allocation Plan for the McLaren Vale Prescribed Wells Area

  • Government of South Australia (1987) Public and Environmental Health Act 1987

  • Government of South Australia (2010) Public and Environmental Health (waste control) Regulations 2010

  • Government of South Australia, Department of Health and Aging (2012) South Australian Recycled Water Guidelines 2012

  • Government of South Australia (2012) Water Industry Act 2012

  • Government of South Australian, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (2012) Managed aquifer recharge. Retrieved from: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/managing-natural-resources/water-use/water-resources/stormwater/managed-aquifer-recharge

  • Government of South Australian, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (2011) Adelaide Plains Model

  • Government of South Australian, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, Aquifer Storage Capacities of the Adelaide Region TODD HODGKIN Report DWLBC 2004/47

  • Government of South Australian, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, R Martin and T Hodgkin, State and Condition of the Adelaide Plains Sub-Aquifers Report DWLBC 2005/32

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Tavis Kleinig and Tim Gubbin from the South Australian EPA for discussion on the progress and use of MAR regulation over the last 12 months. Particular thanks to Greg Ingleton from SA Water and Donna-Lee Edwards from DEWNR for discussions and assistance with reviewing and editing this document.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Quentin Newland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Newland, P.Q. The development, application and acceptance of environmental and health risk assessment methodology for MAR schemes in South Australia. Environ Earth Sci 73, 7739–7745 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3406-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3406-3

Keywords

Navigation