Abstract
The study of the diversity of multivariate objects shares common characteristics and goals across disciplines, including ecology and organizational management. Nevertheless, subject-matter experts have adopted somewhat separate diversity concepts and analysis techniques, limiting the potential for sharing and comparing across disciplines. Moreover, while large and complex diversity data may benefit from exploratory data analysis, most of the existing techniques emphasize confirmatory analysis based on statistical metrics and models. This work aims to bridge these gaps. First, by cross comparing the analyses of species diversity, microbial diversity, and workgroup diversity, we introduce a framework of diversity concerns aligned across the three areas. The alignment framework is validated and refined by feedback from subject-matter experts. Then, guided by the framework and theoretical information visualization and visual analytics principles (as distinguished from scientific visualization), we propose a unified taxonomy of common analytical tasks for exploration of diversity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn J, Plaisant C, Shneiderman B (2013) A task taxonomy for network evolution analysis. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 20(3):365–376
Amar R, Eagan J, Stasko J (2005) Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization. IEEE, pp 111–117
Andrienko N, Andrienko G (2006) Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data. Springer, Berlin
Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (2005) Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
Bezrukova K, Jehn KA, Zanutto EL, Thatcher SM (2009) Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organ Sci 20(1):35–50
Bezrukova K, Spell CS, Perry JL (2010) Violent splits or healthy divides? Coping with injustice through faultlines. Pers Psychol 63(3):719–751
Briggs B, Pohlman J, Torres M, Riedel M, Brodie E, Colwell F (2011) Macroscopic biofilms in fracture-dominated sediment that anaerobically oxidize methane. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(19):6780–6787
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI et al (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Meth 7(5):335–336
Carton AM, Cummings JN (2012) A theory of subgroups in work teams. Acad Manag Rev 37(3):441–470
Cleveland WS, McGill R (1984) Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. J Amer Stat Assoc 79(387):531–554
Cole J, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris R, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen A, McGarrell D, Marsh T, Garrity G et al (2009) The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucl Acids Res 37(suppl 1):D141–D145
Fernstad SJ, Johansson J, Adams S, Shaw J, Taylor D (2011) Visual exploration of microbial populations. In: IEEE symposium on biological data visualization (BioVis). IEEE, pp 127–134
Frey BJ, Dueck D (2007) Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315(5814):972–976
Fuhrman JA (2009) Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 459(7244):193–199
Gobet A, Böer SI, Huse SM, van Beusekom JE, Quince C, Sogin ML, Boetius A, Ramette A (2011) Diversity and dynamics of rare and of resident bacterial populations in coastal sands. ISME J 6(3):542–553
Gobet A, Quince C, Ramette A (2010) Multivariate cutoff level analysis (multicola) of large community data sets. Nucl Acids Res 38(15):e155
Gotelli N, Ellison A (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Gunderson LH (2000), Ecological resilience-in theory and application. Ann Rev Ecol Systemat pp 425–439
Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1199–1228
Hartigan JA, Kleiner B (1981) Mosaics for contingency tables. Proc Interf 1981:268–273
Heer J, Agrawala M (2008) Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. Inf Visual 7(1):49–62
Heer J, Shneiderman B (2012) Interactive dynamics for visual analysis. ACM Queue 10(2):30
Hillebrand H (2004) On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Amer Nat 163(2):192–211
Horn MS, Tobiasz M, Shen C (2009) Visualizing biodiversity with voronoi treemaps. In: Sixth international symposium on Voronoi diagrams (ISVD’09). IEEE, pp 265–270
Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52(4):577–586
Inselberg A (2009) Parallel coordinates: visual multidimensional geometry and its applications. Springer, Berlin
Ives AR, Carpenter SR (2007) Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 317(5834):58–62
Izrailev S, Agrafiotis DK (2004) A method for quantifying and visualizing the diversity of QSAR models. J Mol Graph Model 22(4):275–284
Keim DA (2002) Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 8(1):1–8
Kosara R, Bendix F, Hauser H (2006) Parallel sets: interactive exploration and visual analysis of categorical data. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 12(4):558–568
Lau DC, Murnighan JK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev 23(2):325–340
Lawlor LR (1980) Overlap, similarity, and competition coefficients. Ecology, pp 245–251
Lee B, Parr CS, Campbell D, Bederson BB (2004) How users interact with biodiversity information using taxontree. In: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. ACM, New York, pp 320–327
Mackinlay J (1986) Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 5(2):110–141
Magurran AE (2003) Measuring biological diversity. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
McCann KS (2000) The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405(6783):228–233
Meyer B, Glenz A (2013) Team faultline measures a computational comparison and a new approach to multiple subgroups. Organ Res Meth 16(3):393–424
Meyer B, Shemla M, Schermuly CC (2011) Social category salience moderates the effect of diversity faultlines on information elaboration. Small Group Res 42(3):257–282
Miller J (2005) Spatial and temporal distribution and abundance of moths in the Andrews experimental forest. http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/abstract.cfm?dbcode=SA015
Munzner T (2009) A nested model for visualization design and validation. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 15(6):921–928
Nettle D (1998) Explaining global patterns of language diversity. J Anthropol Archaeol 17(4):354–374
Ogunseitan O (2005) Microbial diversity: form and function in prokaryotes. Blackwell Publishing, UK
Orhan A, Tosun H (2010) Visualization of geotechnical data by means of geographic information system: a case study in eskisehir city (nw turkey). Environ Earth Sci 61(3):455–465
Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5(3):402–411
Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9(6):741–758
Pham T, Hess R, Ju C, Zhang E, Metoyer R (2010) Visualization of diversity in large multivariate data sets. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 16(6):1053–1062
Pham T, Highland S, Metoyer R, Henshaw D, Miller J, Jones J (2011) Interactive visualization of spatial and temporal patterns of diversity and abundance in ecological data. In: Proceedings of Environmental Information Management. Publisher of University of California, California, pp 104–110
Pham T, Jones J, Metoyer R, Swanson F, Pabst R (2013) Interactive visual analysis promotes exploration of long-term ecological data. Ecosphere 4(9). doi:10.1890/ES13-00121.1
Pham T, Metoyer R, Bezrukova K, Spell C (2014) Visualization of cluster structure and separation in multivariate mixed data: A case study of diversity faultlines in work teams. Comput Graph 38(2014):117–130
Ramette A (2007) Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62(2):142–160
Rink K, Kalbacher T, Kolditz O (2012) Visual data exploration for hydrological analysis. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1395–1403
Sanders HL (1968) Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. American Naturalist, USA
Sedlmair M, Tatu A, Munzner T, Tory M (2012) A taxonomy of visual cluster separation factors. Comput Graph Forum 31(3pt4):1335–1344
Seo J, Shneiderman B (2005) A rank-by-feature framework for interactive exploration of multidimensional data. Info Visual 4(2):96–113
Shneiderman B (1992) Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2D space-filling approach. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 11(1):92–99
Shneiderman B (1996) The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Visual Languages. IEEE, pp 336–343
Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Welch DM, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ (2006) Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(32): 12,115–12,120
Spence R (2007) Information visualization: design for interaction. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Stasko J, Zhang E (2000) Focus+context display and navigation techniques for enhancing radial, space-filling hierarchy visualizations. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization (InfoVis 2000). IEEE, pp 57–65
Thatcher SM, Jehn KA, Zanutto E (2003) Cracks in diversity research: the effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Dec Negot 12(3):217–241
Thatcher SM, Patel PC (2012) Group faultlines a review, integration, and guide to future research. J Manag 38(4):969–1009
Thomas JJ, Cook KA (2006) A visual analytics agenda. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26(1):10–13
Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CK, Homan AC et al (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol 89(6):1008–1022
Velasco V, Gogu R, Vázquez-Suñè E, Garriga A, Ramos E, Riera J, Alcaraz M (2013) The use of gis-based 3D geological tools to improve hydrogeological models of sedimentary media in an urban environment. Environ Earth Sci 68(8):2145–2162
Warwick R, Clarke K (1998) Taxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment. J Appl Ecol 35(4):532–543
Weiskopf D, Ma KL, van Wijk JJ, Kosara R, Hauser H (2006) Scivis, infovis-bridging the community divide? In: Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization Conference. IEEE
Whittaker RH (1965) Dominance and diversity in land plant communities: numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science 147(3655):250
Wickham H, Cook D, Hofmann H, Buja A (2010) Graphical inference for infovis. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 16(6):973–979
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the subject-matter experts who participated in the survey study and provided valuable feedback on the manuscript. Support for this research was provided by National Science Foundation funding to the H.J. Andrews Long-term Ecological Research program (NSF 0823380) and ongoing U.S. Forest Service support to the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pham, T., Jones, J., Metoyer, R. et al. Toward exploratory analysis of diversity unified across fields of study: an information visualization approach. Environ Earth Sci 72, 3803–3825 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3365-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3365-8