Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing crop stubble during fallow period for soil water conservation: field experiment and modelling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the arid and semi-arid environments where the rainfall is limited and variable, fallow period soil moisture conservation using stubble is one of the ways of increasing the soil moisture required for crop sowing and development. However, the effectiveness of moisture conservation using stubble depends on the paddock management, soil water content, and rainfall characteristics. To assess the effect of stubble rate and amount of rainfall on the soil moisture conservation, a two-season field experiment was conducted using four stubble rates (0, 2, 4, 6 t/ha) and two water supply amounts. The soil water dynamics was also analysed using a validated Agricultural Production System Simulator (APSIM). In the relatively wet summer season with a high initial soil water content, the amount of water stored in the 2, 4, and 6 t/ha stubble rate treatment plots was higher than that of the bare plots by 10.4, 15.9, and 17.8 mm, respectively. However, in the summer season with a relatively high amount of in-season water input and low initial soil water content, the soil water storage was increased by 29.4, 35.6, and 43.0 mm, respectively. Comparing the results of the two seasons, the highest increase was observed for the 2 t/ha stubble rate. The amount of conserved soil moisture was found to be the highest when the soil profile water content at the start of the summer-fallow period is low and the amount of rain during the summer season is high. The good agreement between the measured and APSIM-simulated soil water contents (R 2 = 0.812), indicates that the model can be used to assess the soil water dynamics under a fallow condition. The APSIM-simulated soil water balance using the weather data of the past 100 years indicated that in a year with low start-of-fallow period soil water content, a 6 t/ha stubble rate can increase the end-of-fallow period soil moisture by up to 60 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anwar MR, O’Leary GL, Rab MA, Fisher PD, Armstrong RD (2009) Advances in precision agriculture in south-eastern Australia. V. Effect of seasonal conditions on wheat and barley yield response to applied nitrogen across management zones. Crop Past Sci 60:901–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ApSoil (2013) A database of soil characteristics. http://www.apsim.info/Wiki/APSoil.ashx

  • Cornish PE (1987) Effects of wheat residues and tillage on the water balance of a red earth soil. In: Proceedings of the 4th Australian Agronomy Conference, Australian society of agronomy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, p. 294

  • Cornish PS, Lymbery JR (1986) Coping with too much stubble: target stubble levels and wide rows. In: JE Pratley, PS Cornish (eds) “Recent advances in weed and crop residue management”, Riverina-Murray Institute of Higher Education, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 27 Feb 1986, pp. 36–38

  • Cutforth HW, McConkey BG, Ulrich D, Miller PR, Angadi SV (2002) Yield and water use efficiency of pulses seeded directly into standing stubble in the semi-arid Canadian prairie. Can J Plant Sci 82:681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhammapala R, Claiborn C, Corkill J, Gullett B (2006) Particulate emissions from wheat and Kentucky bluegrass stubble burning in eastern Washington and northern Idaho. Atmos Environ 40:1007–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton WL, Freebrain DM, Fettell NS, Thomas J (1987) Crop residue management. In: Cornish PS, Pratley JE (eds) Tillage: new directions for Australian agriculture. Inkarta Press, Sydney, pp 179–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebairn DM, Silburn DM (2004) Soil conservation in Australia’s semi-arid tropics: pathways to success, and new challenges. In: SR Raine, AJW Biggs, NW Menzies, DM Freebairn, PE Tolmie (eds)“Conserving soil and water for society: sharing solutions. Proceedings of the 13th International Soil Conservation Organisation Conference”, Australian Society of Soil Science Incorporated/International Erosion Control Association, pp. 416

  • Gregory PJ, Simmonds LP, Pilbeam CJ (2000) Soil type, climatic regime, and the response of water use efficiency to crop management. Agron J 92:814–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incerti M, Sale PWG, O’Leary GJ (1993) Cropping practices in the Victorian Mallee: 1. Effect of direct drilling and stubble retention on the water economy and yield of wheat. Aust J Exp Agr 33:877–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ, Holzworth D, Huth NI, Hargreaves JNG et al (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 18:267–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard JA (1995) A review of trends in wheat yield responses to conservation cropping in Australia. Aust J Exp Agr 35:835–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard JA, Howe GN, Simpfendorfer S, Angus JF, Gardner PA, Hutchinson P (2001) Poor wheat yield response to conservation cropping—causes and consequences during 10 years of the Harden Tillage Trial. In: “Proceedings Australian Agronomy Conference”. Australian Society of Agronomy

  • Lawrence PA, Radford BJ, Thomas GA, Sinclair DP, Key AJ (1994) Effect of tillage practices on wheat performance in a semi-arid environment. Soil Till Res 28:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loague K, Green RE (1991) Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J Contam Hydrol 7:57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marley JM, Littler JW (1989) Winter cereal production on the Darling Downs—an 11 year study of fallowing practices. Aust J Exp Agr 29:807–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckenzie N, Jacquier D, Isbell R, Brown K (2004) Australian soils and landscapes: an illustrated compendium. CSIRO publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzon JP, Sadras VO, Andrade FH (2006) Fallow soil evaporation and water storage as affected by stubble in sub-humid (Argentina) and semi-arid (Australia) environments. Field Crop Res 98:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary GJ, Connor DJ (1997) Stubble retention and tillage in a semi-arid environment: 1. Soil water accumulation during fallow. Field Crop Res 52:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry M (1992) How much stubble? West Aust J Agric 33:1–17

  • Perry M, Jarvis R, Mason MG, Tennant D (1992) Results of stubble research in Western Australia. West Aust J Agr 33:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope CA, Bates DV, Raizenne ME (1995) Health effects of particulate air pollution: time for reassessment. Environ Health Perspect 103:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford BJ, Key AJ, Robertson LN, Thomas AG (1995) Conservation tillage increases soil water storage, soil animal populations, grain yield, and response to fertiliser in the semi-arid subtropics. Aust J Exp Agr 35:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott BJ, Eberbach PL, Evans J, Wade LJ (2010) EH Graham Centre Monograph No. 1: stubble retention in cropping systems in Southern Australia: benefits and challenges.EH Clayton, HM Burns (eds) Industry & Investment NSW, Orange, Australia. Available at: http://www.csu.edu.au/research/grahamcentre

  • Thomas GA, Gibson G, Nielsen RGH, Martin WD, Radford BJ (1995) Effects of tillage, stubble, gypsum, and nitrogen fertiliser on cereal cropping on a red-brown earth in south-west Queensland. Aust J Exp Agr 35:997–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessolek G, Asseng S (2006) Trade-off between wheat yield and drainage under current and climate change conditions in northeast Germany. Eur J Agron 24:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. B Am Meteorol Soc 63:1309–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank David Roberts and Peter Deane for technical assistance and David Luckett and Raymond Cowley for technical advice in setting up the experiment. The lead author was a Research Centre Fellow at the Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ketema Tilahun Zeleke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeleke, K.T., Anwar, M. & Liu, D.L. Managing crop stubble during fallow period for soil water conservation: field experiment and modelling. Environ Earth Sci 72, 3317–3327 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3235-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3235-4

Keywords

Navigation