Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 71, Issue 6, pp 2503–2515 | Cite as

Impacts of sea-level rise and urbanization on groundwater availability and sustainability of coastal communities in semi-arid South Texas

  • Venkatesh Uddameri
  • Sreeram Singaraju
  • E. Annette HernandezEmail author
Thematic Issue


The sea levels along the semi-arid South Texas coast are noted to have risen by 3–5 mm/year over the last five decades. Data from General Circulation Models (GCMs) indicate that this trend will continue in the 21st century with projected sea level rise in the order of 1.8–5.9 mm/year due to the melting of glaciers and thermal ocean expansion. Furthermore, the temperature in South Texas is projected to increase by as much as 4 °C by the end of the 21st century creating a greater stress on scarce water resources of the region. Increased groundwater use hinterland due to urbanization as well as rising sea levels due to climate change impact the freshwater-saltwater interface in coastal aquifers and threaten the sustainability of coastal communities that primarily rely on groundwater resources. The primary goal of this study was to develop an integrated decision support framework to assist land and water planners in coastal communities to assess the impacts of climate change and urbanization. More specifically, the developed system was used to address whether coastal side (primarily controlled by climate change) or landward side processes (controlled by both climate change and urbanization) had a greater control on the saltwater intrusion phenomenon. The decision support system integrates a sharp-interface model with information from GCMs and observed data and couples them to statistical and information-theoretic uncertainty analysis techniques. The developed decision support system is applied to study saltwater intrusion characteristics at a small coastal community near Corpus Christi, TX. The intrusion characteristics under various plausible climate and urbanization scenarios were evaluated with consideration given to uncertainty and variability of hydrogeologic parameters. The results of the study indicate that low levels of climate change have a greater impact on the freshwater-saltwater interface when the level of urbanization is low. However, the rate of inward intrusion of the saltwater wedge is controlled more so by urbanization effects than climate change. On a local (near coast) scale, the freshwater-saltwater interface was affected by groundwater production locations more so than the volume produced by the community. On a regional-scale, the sea level rise at the coast was noted to have limited impact on saltwater intrusion which was primarily controlled by freshwater influx from the hinterlands towards the coast. These results indicate that coastal communities must work proactively with planners from the up-dip areas to ensure adequate freshwater flows to the coast. Field monitoring of this parameter is clearly warranted. The concordance analysis indicated that input parameter sensitivity did not change across modeled scenarios indicating that future data collection and groundwater monitoring efforts should not be hampered by noted divergences in projected climate and urbanization patterns.


Sea level rise Urbanization Groundwater availability Climate change impact assessment Salt water intrusion 


  1. Baker E Jr (1979) Stratigraphic and hydrogeologic framework of part of the coastal plain of Texas: Texas Department of Water Resources Report 236. Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballio F, Guadagnini A (2004) Convergence assessment of numerical Monte Carlo simulations in groundwater hydrology. Water Resour Res 40(4)Google Scholar
  3. Bierwagen BG, Theobald DM, Pyke CR, Choate A, Groth P, Thomas JV, Morefield P (2010) National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(49):20887–20892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CDMO (2012) National estuarine research reserve system. Centralized Data Management Office. Accessed 04 Jan 2013
  5. Census (2010) Census data. United States Census Bureau. Accessed 04/01/2013
  6. Chapra SC, Canale RP (2010) Numerical methods for engineers. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng AD, Halhal D, Naji A, Ouazar D (2000) Pumping optimization in saltwater-intruded coastal aquifers. Water Resour Res 36(8):2155–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chowdhury A, Turco M (2006) Geology of the Gulf Coast Aquifer, Texas, vol 365. Texas Water Development Board Report, AustinGoogle Scholar
  9. Church J, Wilson S, Woodworth P, Aarup T (2007) Understanding sea level rise and variability. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 88(4):43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Douglas BC (1997) Global sea rise: a redetermination. Surv Geophys 18(2–3):279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, Singh P (2012) Irr: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.83Google Scholar
  12. Gibeaut JC, Tremblay T (2003) Coastal hazards atlas of Texas: a tool for hurricane preparedness and coastal management-volume 3: the southeast coast. In: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Final Report for the Texas Coastal Coordination Council, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No NA07OZ0134Google Scholar
  13. Guha H, Panday S (2012) Impact of sea level rise on groundwater salinity in a coastal community of South Florida. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 48(3):510–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurdak JJ, Hanson RT, McMahon PB, Bruce BW, McCray JE, Thyne GD, Reedy RC (2007) Climate variability controls on unsaturated water and chemical movement, High plains aquifer USA. Vadose Zone J 6(3):533–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hajkowicz S, Higgins A (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184(1):255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helton JC, Johnson JD, Sallaberry CJ, Storlie CB (2006) Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(10):1175–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hewitson B, Crane R (2006) Consensus between GCM climate change projections with empirical downscaling: precipitation downscaling over South Africa. Int J Climatol 26(10):1315–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kucherenko S, Rodriguez-Fernandez M, Pantelides C, Shah N (2009) Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(7):1135–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Legendre P (2005) Species associations: the Kendall coefficient of concordance revisited. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 10(2):226–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loaiciga HA, Pingel TJ, Garcia ES (2012) Sea water intrusion by sea-level rise: scenarios for the 21st Century. Ground Water 50(1):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mantoglou A (2003) Pumping management of coastal aquifers using analytical models of saltwater intrusion. Water Resour Res 39(12):1335Google Scholar
  22. Mantoglou A, Papantoniou M (2008) Optimal design of pumping networks in coastal aquifers using sharp interface models. J Hydrol 361(1–2):52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matott LS (2012) Screening-level sensitivity analysis for the design of pump-and-treat systems. Ground Water Monit Rem 32(2):66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Millero F, Huang F (2009) The density of seawater as a function of salinity (5 to 70 g kg−1) and temperature (273.15 to 363.15 K). Ocean Sci 5(2):91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Montagna PA, Gibeaut JC, Tunnell JW Jr (2007) South Texas climate 2100: coastal impacts. South Tex Clim 2100:57–77Google Scholar
  26. Nelson KC, Palmer MA, Pizzuto JE, Moglen GE, Angermeier PL, Hilderbrand RH, Dettinger M, Hayhoe K (2009) Forecasting the combined effects of urbanization and climate change on stream ecosystems: from impacts to management options. J Appl Ecol 46(1):154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicholls RJ, Cazenave A (2010) Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328(5985):1517–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paine JG (1993) Subsidence of the Texas coast: inferences from historical and late Pleistocene sea levels. Tectonophysics 222(3):445–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran 77: The art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West SussexGoogle Scholar
  31. Shafer G, Baker E Jr (1973) Ground-water resources of Kleberg, Kenedy, and southern Jim Wells counties, Texas. Texas Water Development Board Report 173, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharp J Jr, Raymond R, Germiat S, Paine J (1991) Reevaluation of the causes of subsidence along the Texas Gulf of Mexico coast and some extrapolations of future trends. Land Subsid Int Assoc Hydrol Sci Publ 200:397–406Google Scholar
  33. Strack O (1976) A single-potential solution for regional interface problems in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Res 12(6):1165–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. TWDB (2012) 2012 State water plan. Texas Water Development Board, AustinGoogle Scholar
  35. Uddameri V, Kuchanur M (2007) Simulation-optimization approach to assess groundwater availability in Refugio County TX. Environ Geol 51(6):921–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Uddameri V, Estrada F, Hernandez EA (2013) A fuzzy simulation-optimization approach for optimal estimation of groundwater availability under decision maker uncertainty. Environ Earth Sci (In Press)Google Scholar
  37. van der Lubbe JCA (1997) Information theory. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Vappicha V, Nagaraja S (1976) An approximate solution for the transient interface in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 31(1):161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Werner AD, Simmons CT (2009) Impact of sea-level rise on sea water intrusion in coastal aquifers. Ground Water 47(2):197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Venkatesh Uddameri
    • 1
  • Sreeram Singaraju
    • 1
  • E. Annette Hernandez
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations