Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 71, Issue 5, pp 2353–2359 | Cite as

Observations and box model analysis of radon-222 in the atmospheric surface layer at L’Aquila, Italy: March 2009 case study

  • Giovanni PitariEmail author
  • Eleonora Coppari
  • Natalia De Luca
  • Piero Di Carlo
Original Article


Two years of radon-222 observations collected at L’Aquila (Italy) in the atmospheric surface layer during 2004–2006 were analyzed in correlation with meteorological data and other atmospheric tracers. A box model was developed to better understand the mechanisms of diurnal and seasonal variability of the tracer and to indirectly assess the magnitude of the monthly averaged radon soil flux in the L’Aquila measurement site. The model was successfully validated with measurements, with a 0.8 average correlation coefficient between hourly values for the whole period of radon observations. Measurements taken during March 2009 were analyzed to find possible signs of perturbation due to the ongoing seismic activity that would have reached its peak on the 6 April 2009 destructive earthquake. Contrary to the professed (and unpublished) dramatic increases of radon activity unofficially announced to the inhabitants at that time, the study presented here shows that no radon activity increase took place in L’Aquila with respect to a previous ‘seismically unperturbed’ year (same month with similar meteorological conditions), but that an average 30 % decrease was experienced. This conclusion is reached from a direct comparison of observed data and also as a result of the previously validated radon box model constrained by actual meteorological data, from which an indirect estimate of a 17 % reduction of the radon soil flux is obtained.


Atmospheric tracers Box model In situ measurements Radon variability Meteorology 


  1. Allen DJ, Rood RB, Thompson AM, Hudson RD (1996) Three dimensional radon-222 calculations using assimilated meteorological data and a convective mixing algorithm. J Geophys Res 101:6871–6881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cicerone RD, Ebel JE, Britton J (2009) A systematic compilation of earthquake precursors. Tectonophys 476:371–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Considine DB, Bergmann DJ, Liu H (2005) Sensitivity of global modeling initiative chemistry and transport model simulations of radon-222 and lead-210 to input meteorological data. Atmos Chem Phys 5:3389–3406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dentener F, Feichter J, Jeuken A (1999) Simulation of the transport of Rn-222 using on-line and off-line global models at different horizontal resolutions: a detailed comparison with measurements. Tellus 51B:573–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Carlo P, Pitari G, Mancini E, Gentile S, Pichelli E, Visconti G (2007) Evolution of surface ozone in central Italy based on observations and statistical model. J Geophys Res 112:10316–10330. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Carlo P, Pitari G, De Luca N, Battisti D (2008) Observations of surface radon in Central Italy. Environ Geol. doi: 10.1007/s00254-008-1513-8 Google Scholar
  7. Galmarini S (2006) One year of 222-Rn concentration in the atmospheric surface layer. Atmos Chem Phys 6:2865–2887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaudry A, Polian G, Ardouin B, Lambert G (1990) Radon-calibrated emissions of CO2 from South Africa. Tellus 42:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Genthon C, Armengaud A (1995) Radon-222 as a comparative tracer of transport and mixing in 2 general-circulation models of the atmosphere. J Geophys Res 100:2849–2866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall SS (2011) Scientists on trial: at fault? Nature 477:264–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacob DJ, Prather MJ (1990) Radon-222 as a test of convective transport in a general circulation model. Tellus 42B:118–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jordan TH et al (2011) Operational earthquake forecasting: state of knowledge and guidelines for utilization, report by the international commission on earthquake forecasting (ICEF) for civil protection. Ann Geophys 54:4. doi: 10.4401/ag-5350 Google Scholar
  13. Lee HN, Feichter J (1996) An intercomparison of wet precipitation scavenging schemes and the emission rates of Rn-222 for the simulation of global transport and deposition of Pb-210. J Geophys Res 100:253–270Google Scholar
  14. Megumi K, Mamuro T (1973) Radon and thoron exhalation from the ground. J Geophys Res 78:1804–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nosengo N (2012) L’Aquila verdict row grows. Nature 491:15–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ulomov UI, Mavashen BZ (1971) Forerunners of the Tashkent earthquake. Izv Akad Nauk USSR 21:180–200Google Scholar
  17. Washington JW, Rose AW (1990) Regional and temporal relations of radon in soil gas to soil temperature and moisture. Geophys Res Lett 17:829–832. doi: 10.1029/GL017i006p00829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zahorowski W, Chambers SD, Henderson-Sellers A (2004) Ground based radon-222 observations and their application to atmospheric studies. J Environ Radioact 76:3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Pitari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eleonora Coppari
    • 1
  • Natalia De Luca
    • 1
  • Piero Di Carlo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e ChimicheUniversità degli Studi de L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly
  2. 2.Centro di Eccellenza CETEMPSUniversità degli Studi de L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations