Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 71, Issue 5, pp 2115–2132 | Cite as

Study of pore pressure change during mining and its application on water inrush prevention: a numerical simulation case in Zhaogezhuang coalmine, China

  • Bin ZhuEmail author
  • Qiang Wu
  • Jianwen Yang
  • Tao Cui
Original Article

Abstract

Most of water inrush incidents in coalmines are originally derived from a seepage flow through rock mass fractures, particularly in fault zones. Water inrush is typically caused by hydromechanical coupling interactions induced by human activities. Taking the Zhaogezhuang coalmine in northern China as an example, the progress of a lagging water inrush, which occurred at a depth of about −1,100 m, was simulated and analyzed based on the hydromechanical coupling mechanism. A 3D model incorporating the main structures of the study area was constructed based on the geological data and field investigation. The equivalent continuum medium was employed to describe fault zones. Processes of determining the mechanical, rheological and hydraulic parameters are discussed in details. Three hydromechanical coupling models are applied: (1) the elastoplastic strain-fluid coupling mechanism in rock mass within the fault zone, (2) the inelastic creep-fluid coupling mechanism in rock materials within the fault gouge, and (3) the stress-permeability coupling mechanism in the fractured porous rocks. The evolution of water-recharge zones along the fault zone was presented in different mining phases. By comparing the simulated pore pressures with the in situ monitored ones, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) the actual hydraulic behaviors are a combination of the long-term trends and short-term effects; (2) the creep-fluid coupling model reflects the rock hydraulic behaviors of long-term trends, while the elastoplastic strain-fluid coupling model demonstrates the short-term effects; (3) a prediction method called ‘time window’ for the risk of the lagging water inrush is proposed. Its feasibility is discussed.

Keywords

Pore pressure Mining Water inrush Numerical simulation Hydromechanical coupling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Kailuan Group Corporation Grant (No: KL tech. [2011]181). The research was also partially supported by the Program to Sponsor Teams for Innovation in the Construction of Talent Highlands in Guangxi Institutions of Higher Learning. The constructive comments from the editor and anonymous reviewers are greatly appreciated. Supported by Kailuan Group Corporation and Key Laboratory of Geological Engineering Centre of Guangxi

Supplementary material

12665_2013_2616_MOESM1_ESM.docx (122 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 122 kb)

References

  1. Barton NR, Lien R, Lunde J (1977) Estimation of support requirements for underground excavations. In: 16th US Symposium Rock Mech, pp 164–177Google Scholar
  2. Barton NR, Bandis S, Bakhtar K (1985) Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22:121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Báckblom G, Martin CD (1999) Recent experiments in hard rock to study the excavation response: implication of the performance of a nuclear waste geological repository. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 14:377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieniawski ZT (1984) Rock mechanics design in mining and tunneling. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 272Google Scholar
  5. Börgesson L, Pusch R, Fedriksson A, Hökmark H, Karnland O, Sandè NS (1992) Final report of the zones disturbed by blasting and stress release. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB), Stockholm. Stripa Proj Tech Rep 92–08Google Scholar
  6. Cai M (2011) Rock mass characterization and rock property variability considerations for tunnel and cavern design. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caillabet Y, Fabrie P, Landerau P, Noetinger B, Quintard M (2000) Implementation of a finite-volume method for the determination of effective parameters in fissured porous media. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 16:237–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao YX, Qi CQ (2004) A feasibility study of changeover from fragmental water supply to round-the-clock water supply, a case study of Zhaogezhuang mine. Coal Geol China 16(Sup):40–42Google Scholar
  9. Chen WZ, Tan XJ, Lu SP, Yang JP et al (2009a) Research on large-scale triaxial compressive rheological test of soft rock in depth and its constitutive model. China J Rock Mech Eng 28(6):1735–1744Google Scholar
  10. Chen WZ, Yu HD, Wang XQ, Jia SP et al (2009b) Development of a double linkage triaxial testing machine for hydro-mechanical coupling in soft rock. China J Rock Mech Eng 28(11):2176–2183Google Scholar
  11. Coalfield Geological Central Bureau of China (2000) Coalfield hydrogeology of China. Coal Industry Publishing House of China, Beijing, pp 15–59Google Scholar
  12. Cornaton F, Perrochet P (2002) Analytical 1D dual-porosity equivalent solutions to 3D discrete single-continuum models. Application to karstic spring hydrograph modeling. J Hydrol 262:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EI-Naqa A (2001) The hydraulic conductivity of the fractures intersecting Cambrian sandstone rock masses, central Jordan. Environ Geol 40:973–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emsley S, Olsson O, Stenberg L, Alheid H-J, Fall S (1997) ZEDEX–a study of damage and disturbance from tunnel excavation by blasting and tunnel boring. Swedish Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Co. (SKB), Stockholm. Tech Report 97–30Google Scholar
  15. Gerya TV, Stckhert B, Perchuk AL (2002) Exhumation of high-pressure metamorphic rocks in a subduction channel: a numerical simulation. Tectonics 21(6):1056–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodman RE (1970) Deformability of joints. In: Proceedings symposium determination of the in situ modulus of deformation of rock, 2–7 February, Denver, Colorado. ASTM Spec Tech Publ 477, pp 174–196Google Scholar
  17. Goodman R, Moye D, Schalkwyk A, Javendel I (1965) Ground-water inflow during tunnel driving. Eng Geol Bull IAEG 2(1):39–56Google Scholar
  18. Granet S, Fabrie P, Lemonnier P, Quintard M (2001) A two-phase flow simulation of a fractured reservoir using a new fissure element method. J Petrol Sci Eng 32(1):35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray M (1993) OECD/NEA international Stripa project 1980–1992. Overview volume III, engineered barriers. SKB, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  20. Heuer R (1995) Estimating rock tunnel water inflow. In: Proceedings of rapid excavation and tunnelling conference, 1995, pp 41–60Google Scholar
  21. Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:701–710Google Scholar
  22. Itasca Consulting Group (1997) Flac3D, Fast lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions, user’s manual, 2nd edn. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  23. Justo JL, Justo E, Azañón JM, Durand P et al (2010) The use of rock mass classification systems to estimate the modulus and strength of jointed rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li XG, Gao YF (2003) Influence of mining on floor infiltration coefficients. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 22(7):1078–1082Google Scholar
  25. Li GY, Zhou WF (2006) Impact of karst water on coal mining in North China. Environ Geol 49:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Long JCS, Remer JS, Wilson CR, Witherspoon PA (1982) Porous media equivalents for networks of discontinuous fractures. Water Resour Res 18(3):645–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Louis C, Maini Y (1970) Determination of in situ hydraulic parameters in jointed rock. In: Proceedings 2nd international congress rock mechanics, 21–26 September 1970, Belgrade. Inst Dev Water Resour, Belgrade, vol I, pp 235–245Google Scholar
  28. Louis C, Dessenne J-L, Feuga B (1977) Interaction between water flow phenomena and the mechanical behavior of soil or rock masses. In: Gudehus G (ed) Finite elements in geomechanics. Wiley, New York, pp 479–511Google Scholar
  29. McFeat-Smith I, Turner VD, Bracegirdle DR (1985) Tunnelling conditions in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Eng 13(6):13–25Google Scholar
  30. McFeat-Smith I, MacKean R, Waldmo O (1998) Water inflows in bored rock tunnels in Hong Kong: prediction, construction issues and control measures. In: ICE conference on urban ground engineering, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  31. Neuzil CE (2003) Hydromechanical coupling in geologic processes. Hydrogeol J 11:41–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Norton FH (1929) Creep of steel at high temperatures. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsson O (1992) Site characterization and validation–final report: Stripa Project. Swedish Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Co, Stockholm. Rep TR 92–22Google Scholar
  34. Perello P (2011) Estimate of the reliability in geological forecasts for tunnels: toward a structured approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:671–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rutqvist J, Stephansson O (2003) The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeol J 11:7–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sitharam TG, Sridevi J, Shimizu N (2001) Practical equivalent continuum characterization of jointed rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(3):437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sugihara K, Matsu H, Sato T (1999) In situ experiments on rock stress conditions and excavation disturbance in JNC’s geoscientific research program in Japan. In: Saeb S, Francke C (eds) Proceedings international Worksheet Rock Mechanics of Nuclear Waste Repositories, 5–6 June. Veil, Colorado, pp 159–183Google Scholar
  38. Sun J (2007) Rock rheological mechanics and its advance in engineering applications. China J Rock Mech & Eng 26(6):1081–1106Google Scholar
  39. Tao B, Wu FQ, Guo GM et al (2005) Flexibility of visco-elastoplastic model to rheological characteristics of rock and solution of rheological parameter. China J Rock Mech & Eng 24(17):3165–3172Google Scholar
  40. Van Geet M, Bastiaens W, Ortiz L (2008) Self-sealing capacity of argillaceous rocks: review of laboratory results obtained from the SELFRAC project. Phys Chem Earth 33:s396–s406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang SZ, Hou WY, Tang HM, Xiao ZR et al  (1977) Report of extending geological survey within Linxi-Zhaogezhuang coalmine. Kailuan group corporation, Tangshan, pp 10–18Google Scholar
  42. Witherspoon PA (2000) The Stripa project. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 37:385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu YS, Chen YW (1992) Rheologic test and simulation analysis of large scale in situ triaxial compression on defective strata behaviour. Rock Soil Mech 13(1):21–29Google Scholar
  44. Wu Q, Liu JT, Zhong YP, Yin ZR et al (2002) The numeric simulations of water-bursting time-effect for faults in Zhaogezhuang coalmine, Kailuan, China. J China Coal Soc 27(5):511–516Google Scholar
  45. Wu Q, Wang MY, Wu X (2004) Investigations of groundwater bursting into coalmine seam floors from fault zones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(4):557–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu Q, Liu YZ, Liu DH, Zhou WF (2011a) Prediction of floor water inrush: the application of GIS-Based AHP vulnerable index method to Donghuantuo coalmine, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:591–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu Q, Zhu B, Liu SQ (2011b) Flow-solid coupling simulation method analysis and time identification of lagging water inrush near mine fault belt. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(1):93–104Google Scholar
  48. Zhou RG, Cheng BF, Gao YS et al (1998) Relationship between creep behavior of fault gouge and its water contents. China J Eng Geo 6(3):217–222Google Scholar
  49. Zhou RG, Cheng BF, Ye GJ et al (2000) Time effect of water inrush in fault rupture zone. China J Eng Geo 8(4):411–415Google Scholar
  50. Zhu B (2009) Research on fluid-mechanical interaction simulation and application on lagging water inrush near fault zone. Working report of post-doctoral fellow. China university of mining and technology, Beijing, pp 1–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangxi Scientific Experiment Center of Mining, Metallurgy and Environment & Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hidden Metallic Ore Deposits ExplorationGuilin University of TechnologyGuilinChina
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe MiningChina University of Mining and TechnologyBeijingChina
  4. 4.CSIRO Land and WaterDutton ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations