Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using TDR and modeling tools to investigate effects of interactive factors on preferential flow and transport in field sandy clay soil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigation of the extent of preferential flow and transport affected by several factors and their interactions in the vadose zone using the advanced measurement and modeling techniques is crucial for protection of groundwater from agricultural chemicals like fertilizers and pesticides. The objectives of this study were to investigate the interactive effects of factors like soil structure, initial soil water content (SWC), and application rate on preferential flow and transport using the time domain reflectometry (TDR) measurements of SWC and electrical conductivity (EC) in the plots of 12 treatments in a sandy clay field soil, applying the models (HYDRUS-1D and MACRO) to the measured data, performing Tukey test statistical analysis, and relating model parameters to basic soil properties, consequently, flow and transport characteristics. Analysis of response times and the changes in SWC and EC with time during the experiments in the profiles of the treatments confirmed the existence of preferential flow and transport at the site. As long as the other factors or conditions were constant; undisturbed versus disturbed soil, wet versus dry initial SWC, and high versus low application rate caused preferential flow and transport in the soil based on the TDR measurements. Overall HYDRUS-1D had better performance than MACRO in the simulations of the measured data. These results suggest that different scales of these factors in different field soils need to be further studied for better understanding the flow and transport processes in the vadose zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi F, Javaux M, Vanclooster M, Feyen J, Wyseure G, Nziguheba G (2006) Experimental study of water flow and sulphate transport at monolith scale. Agric Water Manag 79:93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreini MS, Steenhuis TS (1990) Preferential paths of flow under conventional and conservation tillage. Geoderma 46:85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmair S, Weiler M, Nützmann G (2009) Controls of land use and soil structure on water movement: lessons for pollutant transfer through the unsaturated zone. J Hydrol 369:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder TA, Waskom RM, Davis JG (2003) Irrigation water quality criteria. Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/crops/00506.html

  • Beven K, Germann P (1982) Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resour Res 18:1311–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booltink HWG, Bouma J (1991) Physical and morphological characterization of by-pass flow in a well-structured clay soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1249–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J (1990) Using morphometric expressions for macropores to improve soil physical analyses of field soils. Geoderma 46:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J (1991) Influence of soil macroporosity on environmental quality. Adv Agron 46:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J, Dekker LW (1978) A case study of infiltration into dry clay soil I. Morphological observations. Geoderma 20:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J, Droogers P, Sonneveld MPW, Ritsema CJ, Hunink JE, Immerzeel WW, Kauffman S (2011) Hydropedological insights when considering catchment classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:1909–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Scientific Inc. (2006) TDR probes CS605, CS610, CS630, CS635, CS640, CS645

  • Dane JH, Topp GC (2002) Methods of soil analysis, Part 4. Physical Methods, SSSA Book Series: 5

  • Edwards EM, Shipitalo MJ, Dick WA, Owens LB (1992) Rainfall intensity affects transport of water and chemicals through macropores in no-till soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmi A, Nohra JSA, Madramootoo CA, Hendershot W (2012) Estimating phosphorus leachability in reconstructed soil columns using HYDRUS-1D model. Environ Earth Sci 65:1751–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flury M, Fluhler H, Jury WA, Leuenberger J (1994) Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: a field study. Water Resour Res 30(7):1945–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flury M, Leuenberger J, Studer B, Fluhler H (1995) Transport of anions and herbicides in a loamy and sandy field soil. Water Resour Res 31(4):823–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur A, Horton R, Jaynes DB, Lee J, Al-Jabri SA (2003) Using surface time domain reflectometry measurements to estimate subsurface chemical movement. Vadose Zone J 2:539–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerke HH, van Genuchten MTh (1993) A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resour Res 29:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghodrati M, Jury WA (1990) A field study using dyes to characterize preferential flow of water. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1558–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giese K, Tiemann R (1975) Determination of the complex permittivity from a thin sample time-domain reflectometry. Improved analysis of the step response waveform. Adv Mol Relax Process 7:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gündoğan R (1998) Land use interpretations at high taxonomic categories level for Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey. In: M.Şefik Yeşilsoy International Symposium on Arid Region Soils, İzmir, Turkey

  • Hawke RM, Price AG, Bryan RB (2006) The effect of initial soil water content and rainfall intensity on near-surface soil hydrologic conductivity: a laboratory investigation. Catena 65:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimovaara TJ, Focke AG, Bouten W (1995) Assessing temporal variations in soil water composition with time domain reflectometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermsmeyer D, Ilsemann J, Bachmann J, van der Ploeg RR, Horton R (2002) Model calculations of water dynamics in lysimeters filled with granular industrial wastes. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutson JL, Wagenet RJ (1995) A multiregion model describing water flow and solute transport in heterogeneous soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:743–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis NJ (1998) Modeling the impact of preferential flow on nonpoint source pollution. In: Selim HM, Ma L (eds) Physical nonequilibrium in soils: modeling and application. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, pp 195–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis NJ, Dubus IG (2006) State-of-the-art review on preferential flow, Report DL#6 of the FP6 EU-funded FOOTPRINT project. www.eu-footprint.org

  • Jones SB, Mace RW, Or D (2005) A time domain reflectometry coaxial cell for manipulation and monitoring of water content and electrical conductivity in variably saturated porous media. Vadose Zone J 4:977–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jury WA (1986) Vadose zone modeling of organic pollutants. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea

    Google Scholar 

  • Katterer T, Schmied B, Abbaspour KC, Schulin R (2001) Single- and dual-porosity modeling of multiple tracer transport through soil columns: effects of initial moisture and mode of application. Eur J Soil Sci 52:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhne S, Lennartz B, Köhne JM, Simunek J (2006) Bromide transport at a tile-drained field site: experiment, and one- and two-dimensional equilibrium and non-equilibrium numerical modeling. J Hydrol 321:390–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulasekera PB, Parkin GW, von Bertoldi P (2011) Using soil water content sensors to characterize tillage effects on preferential flow. Vadose Zone J 10:683–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung KJS, Steenhuis TS, Kladivko EJ, Gish TJ, Bubenzer G, Helling CS (2000a) Impact of preferential flow on the transport of adsorbing and non-adsorbing tracers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1290–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung KJS, Kladivko EJ, Gish TJ, Steenhuis TS, Bubenzer G, Helling CS (2000b) Quantifying preferential flow by breakthrough of sequentially applied tracers: silt loam soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1296–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsbo M, Jarvis NJ (2003) MACRO 5.0. A model of water flow and solute transport in macroporous soil, Technical description

  • Larsson MH, Jarvis NJ (1999) Evaluation of a dual-porosity model to predict field-scale solute transport in a macroporous soil. J Hydrol 215:153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling C, Zhou Q, Xue Y, Zhang Y, Li R, Liu J (2013) Application of electrical resistivity tomography to evaluate the variation in moisture content of waste during 2 months of degradation. Environ Earth Sci 68:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallants D, Vanclooster M, Meddahi M, Feyen J (1994) Estimating solute transport parameters on undisturbed soil columns using time domain reflectometry. J Contam Hydrol 17:91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallants D, Vanclooster M, Toride N, Vanderborght J, van Genuchten MTh, Feyen J (1996) Comparison of three methods to calibrate TDR for monitoring solute movement in undisturbed soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:747–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy EL, Boast CW, Stehouwer RC, Kladivko EJ (1994) Macropore hydraulics: taking a sledgehammer to classical theory. Adv Soil Sci 60:303–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Merdun H, Quisenberry VL (2004a) Simulation of water and solute transport with MACRO model in Cecil loamy sand soil. Aust J Soil Res 42:939–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merdun H, Quisenberry VL (2004b) Relating model parameters to basic soil properties. Aust J Soil Res 42:841–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto T, Kobayashi R, Annaka T, Chikushi J (2001) Applicability of multiple length TDR probes to measure water distributions in an Andisol under different tillage systems in Japan. Soil Till Res 60:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:512–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Noborio K (2001) Measurement of soil water content and electrical conductivity by time domain reflectometry: a review. Comput Electron Agric 31:213–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paniconi C, Wood EF (1993) A detailed model for simulation of catchments scale subsurface hydrologic processes. Water Resour Res 29(6):1601–1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson M, Berndtsson R (1998) Estimating transport parameters in an undisturbed soil column using time domain reflectometry and transfer function theory. J Hydrol 205:232–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson M, Berndtsson R, Nasri S, Albergel J, Zante P, Yumegaki Y (2000) Solute transport and water content measurements in clay soils using time domain reflectometry. Hydrol Sci 45:83–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfletschinger H, Engelhardt I, Piepenbrink M, Königer F, Schuhmann R, Kallioras A, Schüth C (2012) Soil column experiments to quantify vadose zone water fluxes in arid settings. Environ Earth Sci 65:1523–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quisenberry VL, Smith BR, Philips RE, Scott HD, Nortcliff S (1993) A soil classification system for describing water and chemical transport. Soil Sci 156(5):306–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quisenberry VL, Phillips RE, Zeleznik JM (1994) Spatial distribution of water and chloride macropore flow in a well-structured soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(5):1294–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulier S, Jarvis NJ (2003a) Modeling macropore flow effects on pesticide leaching: inverse parameter estimation using microlysimeters. J Environ Qual 32:2341–2353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulier S, Jarvis NJ (2003b) Analysis of inverse procedures for estimating parameters controlling macropore flow and solute transport in the dual-permeability model MACRO. Vadose Zone J 2:349–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MTh (2001) Rosetta: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol 251:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfried MS, Rao PSC (1987) Solute transport in undisturbed columns of an aggregated tropical soil: preferential flow effects. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1434–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng F, Liu H, Zhang R, Wang K (2012) Determining the active region model parameter from dye staining experiments for characterizing the preferential flow heterogeneity in unsaturated soils. Environ Earth Sci 65:1977–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simunek J, Jarvis NJ, van Genuchten MTh, Gardenas A (2003) Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone. J Hydrol 272:14–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simunek J, van Genuchten MTh, Sejna M (2005) The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California

  • Sleutel S, Neve SDe, Singier B, Hofman G (2007) Quantification of organic carbon in soils: a comparison of methodologies and assessment of the carbon content of organic matter. Commun Soil Sci Plan 38:2647–2657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MW, Patterson DE (1984) Determining the unfrozen water content in soils by time-domain reflectometry. Atmos Ocean 22:261–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (1996) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series: 5

  • Topp GC, Davis JL, Annan AP (1980) Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurement in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resour Res 16:574–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topp GC, Davis JL, Bailey WG, Zebchuk WD (1984) The measurement of soil water content using a portable TDR hand probe. Can J Soil Sci 64:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topp GC, Zegelin S, White I (2000) Impacts of the real and imaginary components of relative permittivity on time domain reflectometry measurements in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1244–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsegaye T, Hill RL (1998) Intensive tillage effects on spatial variability of soil physical properties. Soil Sci 163(2):143–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MTh (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MTh, Leij FJ, Yates SR (1991) The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils. EPA/600/2-91/065, US EPA, Ada, OK

  • van Genuchten MTh, Wierenga PJ (1976) Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogeler I, Green S, Nadler A, Duwig C (2001) Measuring transient solute transport through the vadoze zone using time domain reflectometry. Aust J Soil Res 39:1359–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogeler I, Green SR, Clothier BE (2005) Time domain reflectometry as an alternative in solute transport studies. In: Alvarez-enedi J, Munoz-Carpena R (eds) Soil–water–solute processes in environmental systems, monitoring, characterization and modeling. CRC Press, Florida, pp 357–390

    Google Scholar 

  • White RE, Dyson JS, Gerstl Z, Yaron B (1986) Leaching of herbicides through undisturbed cores of a structured clay soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AG, Dowd JF, Scholefield D, Holden NM, Deeks LK (2003) Preferential flow variability in a well-structured soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1272–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wöhling T, Vrugt JA, Barkle GF (2008) Comparison of three multiobjective optimization algorithms for inverse modeling of vadose zone hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project has been supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) with the Project No: 104Y224. The author appreciates the assistance of Jason Ritter and his colleagues, Campbell Scientific Inc., on the CR1000 datalogger programming. The author thanks Prof. Iris Vogeler for her valuable advices on the experimental design, and Prof. Nicholas Jarvis and Prof. Jirka Simunek for their help on the modeling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Akdeniz University, 07058, Antalya, Turkey

    Hasan Merdun

Authors
  1. Hasan Merdun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Merdun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merdun, H. Using TDR and modeling tools to investigate effects of interactive factors on preferential flow and transport in field sandy clay soil. Environ Earth Sci 71, 1821–1838 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2586-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2586-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation