Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 71, Issue 4, pp 1651–1661 | Cite as

Assessment of air pollution originating from copper smelter in Bor (Serbia)

  • Snezana M. SerbulaEmail author
  • Ana A. Ilic
  • Jelena V. Kalinovic
  • Tanja S. Kalinovic
  • Nevenka B. Petrovic
Original Article

Abstract

Air quality monitoring was performed at the measuring sites in the urban-industrial and suburban zone during the period 2005–2007 in Bor (Serbia). Arsenic, lead, cadmium, copper and sulphur dioxide are predominantly of industrial origin as a result of copper production in the study area. The smelter, which is a part of the Mining-Metallurgical Complex Bor, is the major pollution source. As and SO2 are the pollutants which pose the biggest threat for the inhabitants of the Bor area, since the measured concentrations exceed the proposed limit values. The obtained concentrations showed that the endangered areas are in close vicinity of the smelter, as well as in the directions of the prevailing winds. By grouping these pollutants into separate clusters, the results of cluster analysis confirmed high loads of As and SO2 in the air. The results of principal component analysis showed that copper production has major influence on air pollution.

Keywords

Air quality monitoring Copper smelter Airborne pollution Bor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Science of Serbia for financial support (Projects No. 46010 and No. 33038).

References

  1. Al-Masri MS, Al-Kharfan K, Al-Shamali K (2006) Speciation of Pb, Cu and Zn determined by sequential extraction for identification of air pollution sources in Syria. Atmos Environ 40:753–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barcan V (2002) Nature and origin of multicomponent aerial emissions of the copper–nickel smelter complex. Environ Int 28:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beavington F, Cawse PA, Wakenshaw A (2004) Comparative studies of atmospheric trace elements: improvements in air quality near a copper smelter. Sci Total Environ 332:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campa AMS, de la Rosa JD, Sanchez-Rodas D, Oliveira V, Alastuey A, Querol X, Gómez Ariza JL (2008) Arsenic speciation study of PM2.5 in an urban area near a copper smelter. Atmos Environ 42:6487–6495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chatterjee A, Banerjee RN (1999) Determination of lead and other metals in a residential area of greater Calcutta. Sci Total Environ 227:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duker AA, Carranza EJM, Hale M (2005) Arsenic geochemistry and health. Environ Int 31:631–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EC (2000) Ambient air pollution by As, Cd and Ni compounds, working group on As, Cd and Ni compounds, position paper, final version, DG environmentGoogle Scholar
  8. EC (2004) Council Directive 2004/107/EC relating to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air. Off J Eur Commun L23:3–6Google Scholar
  9. EC (2008a) Council Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Off J Eur Union L 152/1Google Scholar
  10. EC (2008b) Council Directive 2008/1272/EEC of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Off J Eur Union L 353/1–1355Google Scholar
  11. Elminir HK (2005) Dependence of urban air pollutants on meteorology. Sci Total Environ 350:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernández-Camacho R, de la Rosa J, Sánchez de la Campa AM, González-Castanedo Y, Alastuey A, Querol X, Rodríguez S (2010) Geochemical characterization of Cu-smelter emission plumes with impact in an urban area of SW Spain. Atmos Res 96:590–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freitas MC, Pacheco AMG, Ventura MG (2004) Anthropogenic sources of PM2.5 arsenic, lead, mercury and nickel in northern metropolitan Lisbon, Portugal. Nucl Instrum Phys Res Sect B 219:153–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gidhagen L, Kahelin H, Schmidt-Thome P, Johansson C (2002) Anthropogenic and natural levels of arsenic in PM10 in Central and Northern Chile. Atmos Environ 36:3803–3817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedberg E, Gidhagen L, Johansson C (2005) Source contributions to PM10 and arsenic concentrations in Central Chile using positive matrix factorization. Atmos Environ 39:549–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IARC (1987) International Agency for Research on Cancer, Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC monographs, vol 1–47Google Scholar
  17. Kavouras IG, Koutrakis P, Cereceda-Balic F, Oyola P (2001) Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 in five Chilean cities using factor analysis—technical paper. Air Waste Manag Assoc 51:451–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Komarnicki GJK (2005) Lead and cadmium in indoor air and the urban environment. Environ Pollut 136:47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Konarski P, Hałuszka J, Ćwil M (2006) Comparison of urban and rural particulate air pollution characteristics obtained by SIMS and SSMS. Appl Surf Sci 252:7010–7013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar AV, Patil RS, Nambi KSV (2001) Source apportionment of suspended particulate matter at two traffic junctions in Mumbai, India. Atmos Environ 35:4245–4251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. LEAP (2003) Local environmental action plan of municipality of Bor, Serbia (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  22. Li X, Zhang Y, Tan M, Liu J, Bao L, Zhang G, Li Y, Iida A (2009) Atmospheric lead pollution in fine particulate matter in Shanghai, China. J Environ Sci (China) 21:1118–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mandal BK, Suzuki KT (2002) Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58:201–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matschullat J (2000) Arsenic in the geosphere—a review. Sci Total Environ 249:297–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MMI (2007) Mining and Metallurgy Institute Bor, Reports on quality of ambient air in Bor from 2005 to 2007, Sector for measuring and control of gaseous and dust parameters, Department Chemical-Technical Control (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  26. Nam D-H, Lee D-P (2006) Monitoring for Pb and Cd pollution using feral pigeons in rural, urban, and industrial environments of Korea. Sci Total Environ 357:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Official Gazette of Republic of Serbia (2006) Regulation about limit values, methods of concentration measurements, criteria for determining the measuring sites and data records. No. 19/06 (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  28. Querol X, Alastuey A, Moreno T et al (2008) Spatial and temporal variations in airborne particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) across Spain 1999–2005. Atmos Environ 42:3964–3979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanchez-Rodas D, Sanchez de la Campa AM, de la Rosa JD, Oliveira V, Gomez-Ariza JL, Querol X, Alastuey A (2007) Arsenic speciation of atmospheric particulate matter (PM10) in an industrialised urban site in southwestern Spain. Chemosphere 66:1485–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Say NP (2006) Lignite-fired thermal power plants and SO2 pollution in Turkey. Energ Policy 34:2690–2701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SEPA (2008) Serbian Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Reports for the Republic of Serbia, 2005–2007. The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Spatial Planning, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  32. Serbula SM, Antonijevic MM, Milosevic NM, Milic SM, Ilic AA (2010) Concentrations of particulate matter and arsenic in Bor (Serbia). J Hazard Mater 181:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Serbula SM, Kalinovic TS, Kalinovic JV, Ilic AA (2013) Exceedance of air quality standards resulting from pyro-metallurgical production of copper: a case study, Bor (Eastern Serbia). Environ Earth Sci 68(7):1989–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shridhar V, Khillare PS, Agarwal T, Ray S (2010) Metallic species in ambient particulate matter at rural and urban location of Delhi. J Hazard Mater 175:600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tasdemir Y, Kural C, Cindoruk S, Vardar N (2006) Assessment of trace element concentrations and their estimated dry deposition fluxes in an urban atmosphere. Atmos Res 81:17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teixeira EC, Meira L, de Santana ERR, Wiegand F (2009) Chemical composition of PM10 and PM2.5 and seasonal variation in South Brazil. Water Air Soil Pollut 199:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toledo VE, Almeida Júnior PB, Quiterio SL, Arbilla G, Moreira A, Escaleira V, Moreira JC (2008) Evaluation of levels, sources and distribution of toxic elements in PM10 in a suburban industrial region, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Environ Monit Assess 139:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. US EPA (2007) US environmental protection agency integrated risk information system—IRIS. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0278.htm
  39. US EPA (2010) US Environmental Protection Agency: national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html
  40. Vieira BJ, Biegalski SR, Freitas MC, Landsberger S (2006) Atmospheric trace metal characterization in industrial area of Lisbon, Portugal. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 270:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. WHO (2001) World Health Organization: air quality guidelines for Europe, 2nd edn. Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  42. WHO (2005) World Health Organization: air quality guidelines, Global update 2005. Particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang S, Yuesi W, Changchun Z (2009) Measurement of the vertical profile of atmospheric SO2 during the heating period in Beijing on days of high air pollution. Atmos Environ 43:468–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang J, Ouyang Z, Miao H, Wang X (2011) Ambient air quality trends and driving factor analysis in Beijing, 1983–2007. J Environ Sci (China) 23:2019–2028CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Snezana M. Serbula
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana A. Ilic
    • 1
  • Jelena V. Kalinovic
    • 1
  • Tanja S. Kalinovic
    • 1
  • Nevenka B. Petrovic
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical Faculty in BorUniversity of BelgradeBorSerbia
  2. 2.Mining and Metallurgy Institute BorBorSerbia

Personalised recommendations