Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic studies and elemental analysis of river sediments: a case study from the Ponnaiyar River (Southeastern India)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ponnaiyar River is one of the largest rivers of the Tamil Nadu state (India), flowing a distance of 430 km from its point of origin to the sea. This work contributes with new data of magnetic and elemental composition of river sediments, and improves the knowledge obtained by preliminary and previous studies of rivers from Southeastern India. Magnetic susceptibility, anhysteretic and isothermal remanent magnetization and chemical determinations (major and trace metals) were measured. Magnetic results reveal the predominance of magnetite-like mineral with magnetic grain size variations along the river and in depth. Most of the uppermost samples have the major presence of trace metals and higher values of magnetic concentration. Magnetic and chemical variables were also analysed as potential pollution indicators using multivariate statistical techniques: canonical correlation and fuzzy c-means clustering analyses, which confirmed the existence of relationships, but not in a simple way, between magnetic and chemical variables. Furthermore, fuzzy analysis allows classifying the data in different well-differentiated groups regarding the trace metal load, concentration and feature-dependent parameters. The most polluted samples show high concentration of trace elements and magnetic carriers, softer and coarser magnetic minerals; on the contrary, the unpolluted samples (from the deepest sediments) have the opposite characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annexure (2006) Baseline environmental and social information of river basins. The irrigated agriculture modernisation and water-bodies restoration and management (IAMWARM) project. http://www.iamwarm.gov.in/Environment/annexures.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2012

  • Augustinus P, Barton CE, Zawadzki A, Harle K (2010) Lithological and geochemical record of mining-induced changes in sediments from Macquarie Harbour, southwest Tasmania. Aust Environ Earth Sci 61(3):625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartington Instruments Ltd (1994) Operation manual. Environmental magnetic susceptibility—using the Bartington MS2 system. Chi Publishing, UK, p 54

  • Chaparro Marcos AE, Chaparro Mauro AE, Rajkumar P, Ramasamy V, Sinito Ana M (2011) Magnetic parameters, trace elements and multivariate statistical studies of river sediments from south eastern India: a case study from Vellar River. Environ Earth Sci 63(2):297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro MAE, Gogorza CSG, Chaparro MAE, Irurzun MA, Sinito AM (2006) Review of magnetism and heavy metal pollution studies of various environments in Argentina. Earth Planets Space 58(10):1411–1422

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro MAE, Sinito AM, Ramasamy V, Marinelli C, Chaparro MAE, Mullainathan S, Murugesan S (2008a) Magnetic measurements and pollutants of sediments from Cauvery and Palaru River. India Environ Geol 56:425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro MAE, Chaparro MAE, Marinelli C, Sinito AM (2008b) Multivariate techniques as alternative statistical tools applied to magnetic proxies for pollution: cases of study from Argentina and Antarctica. Environ Geol 54:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro MAE, Chaparro MAE, Sinito AM (2012) An interval fuzzy model for magnetic monitoring: estimation of a pollution index. Environ Earth Sci 66(5):1477–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadras CM (1981) Métodos de analisis multivariante. Eunibar, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing J, Dann R, Hay K, Lees J, Loveland P, Maher B, O’Grady K (1996) Frequency-dependent susceptibility measurements of environmental materials. Geophys J Int 124:228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desenfant F, Petrovský E, Rochette P (2004) Magnetic signature of industrial pollution of stream sediments and correlation with heavy metals: case study from South France. Water Air Soil Pollut 152(1):297–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop J, Ozdemir O (1997) Rock magnetism. Fundamentals and frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 573

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durza O (1999) Heavy contamination and magnetic susceptibility in soils around metallurgical plant. Phys Chem Earth (A) 24(6):541–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Baghdadi M, Barakat A, Sajieddine M, Nadem S (2012) Heavy metal pollution and soil magnetic susceptibility in urban soil of Beni Mellal City (Morocco). Environ Earth Sci 66:141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke C, Kissel C, Robin E, Bonté P, Lagroix F (2009) Magnetic particle characterization in the Seine river system: Implications for the determination of natural versus anthropogenic input. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 10(Q08Z05):20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudadhe SS, Sangode SJ, Patil SK, Chate DM, Meshram DC, Badekar AG (2012) Pre-and post-monsoon variations in the magnetic susceptibilities of soils of Mumbai metropolitan region: implications to surface redistribution of urban soils loaded with anthropogenic particulates. Environ Earth Sci doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1528-z

  • Hanesch M, Scholger R, Dekkers MJ (2001) The application of fuzzy C-means cluster analysis and non-linear mapping to a soil data set for the detection of polluted sites. Phys Chem Earth (A) 26(1–12):885–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InfoStat (2009) InfoStat versión 2009. Grupo InfoStat, FCA. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

  • Jordanova DV, Hoffmann V, Thomas Fehr K (2004) Mineral magnetic characterization of anthropogenic magnetic phases in the Danube river sediments (Bulgarian part). Earth Planet Sci Lett 221:71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J, Banerjee SK, Marvin J, Özdemir Ö (1982) A comparison of different magnetic methods for determining the relative grain size of magnetite in natural materials: some results from lake sediments. Earth Planet Sci Lett 59:404–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knab M, Appel E, Hoffmann V (2001) Separation of the anthropogenic portion of heavy metal contents along a highway by means of magnetic susceptibility and fuzzy c-means cluster analysis. Eur J Environ Eng Geophys 6:125–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Knab M, Hoffmann V, Petrovský E, Kapicka A, Jordanova N, Appel E (2006) Surveying the anthropogenic impact of the Moldau river sediments and nearby soils using magnetic susceptibility. Environ Geol 49:527–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher BA (1986) Characterisation of soils by mineral magnetic measurements. Phys Earth Planet Int 42:76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher BA, Thompson R, Hounslow MW (1999) Introduction. In: Maher BA, Thompson R (eds) Quaternary climate, environments and magnetism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peters C, Dekkers M (2003) Selected room temperature magnetic parameters as a function of mineralogy, concentration and grain size. Phys Chem Earth 28:659–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovský E, Ellwood B (1999) Magnetic monitoring of air, land and water pollution. In: Maher BA, Thompson R (eds) Quaternary climates, environment and magnetism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 279–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovský E, Kapicka A, Jordanova N, Boruka L (2001) Magnetic properties of alluvial soils contaminated with lead, zinc and cadmium. J App Geophys 48:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy V, Murugesan S, Mullainathan S, Chaparro MAE (2006) Magnetic characterization of recently excavated sediments of Cauvery River, Tamil Nadu India. Pollut Res 25(2):357–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy V, Suresh G, Venkatachalapathy R (2009) Magnetic susceptibility of the Ponnaiyar river sediments, Tamilnadu, India. Glob J Environ Res 3(2):126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby D, Chitra C, Vasantha A, Ramasubbulakshmi T, Manivel M (2010) Integrated analysis of geophysical data of Ponnaiyar river basin using Arcview GIS software. Int J Geomat Geosci 1(3):456–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandeep K, Shankar R, Krishnaswamy J (2011) Assessment of suspended particulate pollution in the Bhadra River catchment, Southern India: an environmental magnetic approach. Environ Earth Sci 62:625–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suresh G, Ramasamy V, Meenakshisundaram V, Venkatachalapathy R, Ponnusamy V (2011a) Influence of mineralogical and heavy metal composition on natural radionuclide concentrations in the river sediments. Appl Radiat Isot 69:1466–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suresh G, Ramasamy V, Meenakshisundaram V, Venkatachalapathy R, Ponnusamy V (2011b) A relationship between the natural radioactivity and mineralogical composition of the Ponnaiyar river sediments, India. J Environ Radioact 102:370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suresh G, Ramasamy V, Ponnusamy V (2011c) Mineralogical and thermoluminiscence characterization of the river sediments from Tamilnadu, India. Nat Res Res 20:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Oldfield F (1986) Environmental magnetism. Allen & Unwin (Publishers) Ltd., Australia, p 225

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • TNPCB (2010) Tamil Nadu pollution control board. http://www.tnpcb.gov.in/pdf/17_catagory_list.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2012

  • Wang XS, Qin Y (2006) Use of multivariate statistical analysis to determine the relationship between the magnetic properties of urban topsoil and its metal, S, and Br content. Environ Geol 51:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Annamalai University, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNCPBA), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET) for their financial support. The authors also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped in improving the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos A. E. Chaparro.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaparro, M.A.E., Suresh, G., Chaparro, M.A.E. et al. Magnetic studies and elemental analysis of river sediments: a case study from the Ponnaiyar River (Southeastern India). Environ Earth Sci 70, 201–213 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2116-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2116-y

Keywords

Navigation