Lab-scale performance of selected expandable clays under HLW repository conditions
Smectite clay has been proposed for embedding canisters with highly radioactive waste in deep repositories because of its isolating capacity. Montmorillonite-rich bentonite is a premier buffer candidate for many national organizations that are responsible for disposal of such waste. Experience from the use of drilling mud at large depths indicates that other smectite clay minerals are more stable chemically and saponite is one of them. The physical properties of smectitic mixed-layer minerals like Friedland clay are known to be less sensitive to high salt contents and such clay may also be a buffer candidate. Montmorillonite-rich MX-80 clay, Greek saponite with a minor amount of palygorskite, and Friedland clay were investigated in hydrothermal tests with dense samples confined in oedometers with 95 °C temperature at one end, which was made of copper, and 35 °C at the other, for 8 weeks. A 1 % CaCl2 solution was circulated through a filter at the cold end. At the end of the tests, the samples were sliced into three parts, which were tested with respect to expandability, hydraulic conductivity, and chemical composition. The tests showed that while the saponite was hardly changed at all and did not take up any copper, MX-80 underwent substantial changes in physical performance and adsorbed significant amounts of copper. The Friedland clay sample was intermediate in both respects.
KeywordsSmectite alteration THMC-framework Mineralogy Hydraulic conductivity Swelling pressure
Support to complete the manuscript from the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development, Vietnam (project code 105.02.54.09) is gratefully acknowledged.
- Andrews PRA (1992) Summary report No. 17: Bentonite, Fuller’s Earth and Kaolinite, CANMET, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- Beverskog B, Puigdomenech I (1998) Pourbaix diagrams for the system copper-chlorine at 5–100°C. SKI Rapport 98:19. Swedish Nuclear Power InspectorateGoogle Scholar
- Henning K-H, Störr M (1986) Electron micrographs (TEM, SEM) of clays and clay minerals. Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Madsen FT, Mueller-Vonmoos M (1988) Das Quellverhalten der Tone. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Grundbau und Bodenmechanik der ETH—Zürich, 133:39–56Google Scholar
- Nguyen Thanh Lan (2012) Mineralogical Characterization of Fe-driven Alteration in Smectites. Inauguraldissertation, University of GreifswaldGoogle Scholar
- Pusch R (2002) Handbook of buffer and backfill. SKB Technical Report TR-02-12. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, StockholmGoogle Scholar
- Pusch R, Kasbohm J (2002) Alteration of MX-80 by hydrothermal treatment under high salt content conditions. SKB Technical Report TR-02-06. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, StockholmGoogle Scholar
- Pusch R, Yong RN (2006) Microstructure of smectite clays and engineering performance. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Pusch R, Kasbohm J, Pacovsky J, Cechova Z (2007) Are all smectite clays suitable as “buffers”? Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 32:116–122 (Clay in natural and engineered barriers for radioactive waste confinement—Part 1). doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2006.03.008
- Svemar C (2005a) Prototype repository project. Final Report of European Commission Contract FIKW-2000-00055, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Svemar C (2005b) Cluster repository project (CROP). Final Report of European Commission Contract FIR1-CT-2000-20023, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Wilson J, Savage D, Bond A, Watson S, Pusch R, Bennett D (2011) Bentonite—A Review of key properties, processes and issues for consideration in the UK context. Quintessa Ltd., Henley-on-ThamesGoogle Scholar