Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aquifer heat storage: sulphate reduction with acetate at increased temperatures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aquifer thermal energy storage in urban and industrial areas can lead to an increase in subsurface temperature to 70 °C and more. Besides its impacts on mineral and sorption equilibria and chemical reaction kinetics in an aquifer, temperature sensitively influences microbial activity and thus redox processes, such as sulphate reduction. Microorganism species can only operate within limited temperature ranges and their adaptability to temperature is a crucial point for the assessment of the environmental consequences of subsurface heat storage. Column experiments with aquifer sediment and tap water at 10, 25, 40, and 70 °C showed that under the constant addition of acetate sulphate reduction could be initiated after 26–63 pore volumes exchanged at all temperatures. Fastest initiation of sulphate reduction with the highest reduction rates was found at 40 °C. Maximum rate constants during experimental run-time were 0.56 h−1 at 40 °C and 0.33, 0.36, and 0.25 h−1 at 10 and, 25, and 70 °C, respectively. Hence, microbial activity was enhanced by a temperature increase to 40 °C but was significantly lowered at 70 °C. At 25 °C methane was found in solution, indicating the presence of fermenting organisms; at 10, 40, and 70 °C no methane production was observed. It could be shown that redox processes in an aquifer generally can adapt to temperatures significantly higher than in situ temperature and that the efficiency of the reduction process can be enhanced by temperature increase to a certain limit. Enhancement of sulphate reduction in an aquifer due to temperature increase could also allow enhanced degradation of organic ground water contaminants such as BTEX, where sulphate is an important electron acceptor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arning E, Kölling M, Panteleit B, Reichling J, Schulz HD (2006) Einfluss oberflächennaher Wärmegewinnung auf gechemische Prozesse im Grundwasserleiter. Grundwasser 1:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas RM, Bartha R (1998) Microbial ecology—fundamentals and applications, 4th edn. Benjamin/Cummings Science Publishing, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethke CM, Sanford RA, Kirk MF, Jin Q, Flynn TM (2011) The thermodynamic ladder in geomicrobiology. Am J Sci 311:183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM, Shaw K (1958) Denitrification in soil. II. Factors affecting denitrification. J Agric Sci 51:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brielmann H, Lueders T, Schreglmann K, Ferraro F, Avramov M, Hammerl V, Blum P, Bayer P, Griebler C (2011) Oberflächennahe Geothermie und ihre potenziellen Auswirkungen auf Grundwasserökosysteme. Grundwasser 16:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brons HJ, Griffioen J, Appelo CAJ, Zehnder AJB (1991) (Bio)Geochemical reactions in aquifer material from a thermal energy storage site. Water Resour Res 25(6):729–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canfield DE, Rauiswell R, Bottrell S (1992) The reactivity of sedimentary iron minerals toward sulfide. Am J Sci 292:659–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettmer K (2002) A discussion of the effects of thermal remediation treatments on microbial degradation processes. National Network of Environmental Management Studies Fellow for US EPA

  • Dou J, Liu X, Hu Z, Deng D (2008) Anareobic BTEX biodegradation linked to nitrate and sulfate reduction. J Hazard M 151:720–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert M (1997) Der Einfluss des Redoxmilieus auf die Mobilität von Chrom im durchströmten Aquifer. Dissertation, Universität Bremen

  • Elsgaard L, Isaksen MF, Jorgensen BB, Alayse A-M, Jannasch HW (1994) Microbial sulafte reduction in deep-sea sediments at the Guaymas Basin hydrothermal vent are: influence of temperature and substrates. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58(16):3335–3343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffioen J, Appelo CAJ (1993) Nature and extent of carbonate precipitation during aquifer thermal energy storage. Appl Geochem 8:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harada H, Uemura S, Momonoi K (1994) Interaction between sulfate-reducing bacteria and methane-producing bacteria in UASB reactors fed with low strength wastes containing different levels of sulfate. Water Res 28(2):355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölting B (1996) Hydrogeologie. Einführung in die Allgemeine und Angewandte Hydrogeologie, vol 5. Enke

  • Li X, Chen Z, Zhao J (2006) Simulation and experiment on the thermal performance of U-vertical ground coupled heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 26:1564–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamleam W, Annachhatre AP (2007) Electron donors for biological sulfate reduction. Biotechnol Adv 25:452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Klug MJ (1983) Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations. App Environ Microbiol 45(1):187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Phillips EJP (1988) Manganese inhibition of microbial iron reduction in anaerobic sediments. Geomicrobiol J 6:145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maree JP, Strydom WF (1987) Biological sulphate removal from industrial effluent in an upflow packed bed reactor. Water Res 21(2):141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier J, Costa R, Smalla K, Boehrer B, Wendt-Potthoff K (2005) Temperature dependence of Fe(III) and sulfate reduction rates and its effect on growth and composition of bacterial enrichments from an acidic pit lake neutralization experiment. Geobiology 3:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohn WW, Tiedje JM (1992) Microbial reductive dehalogenation. Microbiol Rev 56(3):482–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe S, Characklis WG (1992) Effects of temperature and phosphorous concentration in microbial sulfate reduction by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Biotechnol Bioeng 39:1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallud C, Van Cappellen P (2006) Kinetics of microbial sulfate reduction in estuarine sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:1148–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabus R, Brüchert V, Amann J, Könneke M (2002) Physiological response to temperature changes of the marine, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfobacterium autotrophicum. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 42:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rintala J, Lettinga G (1992) Effects of temperature elevation from 37 to 55 °C on anaerobic treatment of sulphate rich acidified wastewaters. Environ Technol 13:801–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roychoudhury AN, Merrett GL (2006) Redox Pathways in a petroleum contaminated shallow sandy aquifer: iron and sulfate reductions. Sci Total Environ 366:262–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt T (2005) Müller-Steinhagen H Erdsonden- und Aquifer-Wärmespeicher in Deutschland. In: OTTI Profiforum Oberflächennahe Geothermie, Regenstauf

  • Thauer RK, Möller-Zinkham D, Spormann AM (1989) Biochemistry of acetate catabolism in anaerobic chemotrophic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 43:43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westrich JT, Berner RA (1988) The Effect of Temperature on Rates of Sulfate Reduction in Marine Sediments. Geomicrobiol J 6:99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoda M, Kitagawa M, Miyaji Y (1987) Long term competition between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria for acetate in anaerobic biofilm. Water Res 21(12):1547–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the German Ministry of Science, Economic Affairs and Transport and the University of Kiel and was part of the “GeoCITTI” research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Jesußek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jesußek, A., Köber, R., Grandel, S. et al. Aquifer heat storage: sulphate reduction with acetate at increased temperatures. Environ Earth Sci 69, 1763–1771 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2009-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2009-0

Keywords

Navigation