Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 69, Issue 5, pp 1673–1683 | Cite as

Interaction of longitudinal surface settlements for twin tunnels in shallow and soft soils: the case of Istanbul Metro

  • Ibrahim OcakEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Increasing demands on infrastructures increases the attention on shallow soft ground tunneling methods in urbanized areas. Especially, in metro tunnel excavations, it is important to control the surface settlements observed before and after excavation, which may cause damage to surface structures. To solve this problem, earth pressure balance machines (EPBMs) have widely been used throughout the world. This study focuses on surface settlement measurements, the interaction of twin tunnel surface settlement, and the relationship between shield parameters and surface settlement for parallel tunnels using EPBM shields in clay and sand soils. In this study, the tunnels were excavated using two EPBMs. The tunnels were 6.5 m in diameter, as twin tubes with a 14 m distance from center to center. The EPBM in the first tube followed about 100 m behind the other tube. Segmental lining with 1.4 m of length was employed as a final support. The results from this study showed that (1) the most important parameters for the maximum surface settlements are the face pressure and backfill; (2) in twin tunnel excavation with EPBM for longitudinal profile, the settlement rate reached its peak value when the shield came to the monitoring section and this peak value continued until the shield passed the monitoring section; (3) every shield affected the other tunnel’s longitudinal surface settlement profile by approximately 35–36.8 %; (4) S A, S B and S C values were found to be 38.0, 35.8 and 26.2 %, respectively for an EPBM, and (5) ensuring good construction quality is a very effective way to control face stability and minimize surface settlement.

Keywords

Twin tunnel excavation Surface settlement EPBM Interaction of settlements 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University, Project Number 24410. The author is grateful to the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality for supplying data.

References

  1. Chen RP, Zhu J, Liu W, Tang XW (2011) Ground movement induced by parallel EPB tunnels in silty soils. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(1):163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chou WI, Bobet A (2002) Predictions of ground deformations in shallow tunnels in clay. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 17(1):3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ercelebi SG, Copur H, Ocak I (2010) Surface settlement predictions for Istanbul metro tunnels excavated by EPB-TBM. Environ Earth Sci 62(2):357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ITA/AITES (2007) ITA/AITES report 2006 on settlements induced by tunneling in soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22:119–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jancsecz S, Steiner W (1994) Face support for a large mix-shield in heterogeneous ground conditions. Tunnelling, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Migliazza M, Chiorboli M, Giani GP (2009) Comparison of analytical method, 3D finite element model with experimental subsidence measurements resulting from the extension of the Milan underground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 36(1–2):113–124Google Scholar
  7. Mroueh H, Shahrour I (2008) A simplified 3D model for tunnel construction using tunnel boring machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(1):38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ocak I (2008a) Estimating the modulus of elasticity of the rock material from compressive strength and unit weight. S Afr Inst Min Metall 108(10):621–626Google Scholar
  9. Ocak I (2008b) Control of surface settlements with umbrella arch method in second stage excavations of Istanbul Metro. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(6):674–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ocak I (2009a) Environmental problems caused by Istanbul subway excavation and suggestions for remediation. Environ Geol 58(7):1557–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ocak I (2009b) Environmental effects of tunnel excavation in soft and shallow ground with EPBM: the case of Istanbul. Environ Earth Sci 59(2):347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ocak I, Bilgin N (2010) Comparative studies on the performance of a roadheader, impact hammer and drilling and blasting method in the excavation of metro station tunnels in Istanbul. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 25(2):181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pantet A (1991) Creusement des galeries a faible profondeur a l’aide d’un tunnelier a pression de boue. Mesures in situ et étude théorique champ de déplacement, PhD thesis, INSA, LyonGoogle Scholar
  14. Suwansawat S (2006) Superposition technique for mapping surface settlement troughs over twin tunnels. In: Intern symp on underground excavation and tunnelling, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 353–362Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mining Engineering DepartmentIstanbul UniversityAvcilar/IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations