Interaction of longitudinal surface settlements for twin tunnels in shallow and soft soils: the case of Istanbul Metro
- 582 Downloads
Increasing demands on infrastructures increases the attention on shallow soft ground tunneling methods in urbanized areas. Especially, in metro tunnel excavations, it is important to control the surface settlements observed before and after excavation, which may cause damage to surface structures. To solve this problem, earth pressure balance machines (EPBMs) have widely been used throughout the world. This study focuses on surface settlement measurements, the interaction of twin tunnel surface settlement, and the relationship between shield parameters and surface settlement for parallel tunnels using EPBM shields in clay and sand soils. In this study, the tunnels were excavated using two EPBMs. The tunnels were 6.5 m in diameter, as twin tubes with a 14 m distance from center to center. The EPBM in the first tube followed about 100 m behind the other tube. Segmental lining with 1.4 m of length was employed as a final support. The results from this study showed that (1) the most important parameters for the maximum surface settlements are the face pressure and backfill; (2) in twin tunnel excavation with EPBM for longitudinal profile, the settlement rate reached its peak value when the shield came to the monitoring section and this peak value continued until the shield passed the monitoring section; (3) every shield affected the other tunnel’s longitudinal surface settlement profile by approximately 35–36.8 %; (4) S A, S B and S C values were found to be 38.0, 35.8 and 26.2 %, respectively for an EPBM, and (5) ensuring good construction quality is a very effective way to control face stability and minimize surface settlement.
KeywordsTwin tunnel excavation Surface settlement EPBM Interaction of settlements
This study was supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University, Project Number 24410. The author is grateful to the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality for supplying data.
- Jancsecz S, Steiner W (1994) Face support for a large mix-shield in heterogeneous ground conditions. Tunnelling, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Migliazza M, Chiorboli M, Giani GP (2009) Comparison of analytical method, 3D finite element model with experimental subsidence measurements resulting from the extension of the Milan underground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 36(1–2):113–124Google Scholar
- Ocak I (2008a) Estimating the modulus of elasticity of the rock material from compressive strength and unit weight. S Afr Inst Min Metall 108(10):621–626Google Scholar
- Pantet A (1991) Creusement des galeries a faible profondeur a l’aide d’un tunnelier a pression de boue. Mesures in situ et étude théorique champ de déplacement, PhD thesis, INSA, LyonGoogle Scholar
- Suwansawat S (2006) Superposition technique for mapping surface settlement troughs over twin tunnels. In: Intern symp on underground excavation and tunnelling, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 353–362Google Scholar