Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Groundwater vulnerability assessment and sensitivity analysis in Nong Rua, Khon Kaen, Thailand, using a GIS-based SINTACS model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The SINTACS approach was used to evaluate intrinsic groundwater vulnerability within Nong Rua District, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand. The approach is based on seven environmental variables prepared in the form of GIS data layers. These variables are depth to water level, infiltration capacity, unsaturated zone, soil type, aquifer media, hydraulic conductivity, and slope. The resulting vulnerability map depicts the spatial extent of six classes of vulnerability ranging from very low to extremely high. High and moderate level classes of vulnerability dominated most of the study area. The northwestern, southwestern and central parts of the study area fell under the very high and extremely high vulnerability levels according to this approach. These regions displayed characteristics that indicated their vulnerability such as a high infiltration rate, coarse-texture soil, and shallow depth to groundwater. The statistical correlation coefficient between the nitrate concentration in 87 wells and the SINTACS vulnerability levels was 0.51. Both map removal and single variable sensitivity analyses were performed to observe the influence of specific variables on the model result. The result of this study is useful for guiding strategic planning of groundwater quality management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Kuisi M, El-Naqa A, Hammouri N (2006) Vulnerability mapping of shallow groundwater aquifer using SINTACS model in the Jordan valley area, Jordan. Environ Geol 50:651–667. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0239-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Amoush H, Hammouri NA, Zunic F, Salameh E (2010) Intrinsic vulnerability assessment for the alluvial aquifer in the northern part of Jordan valley. Water Res Manage 24:3461–3485. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9615-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hacket G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. US Environmental Protection Agency Report (EPA/600/2-87/035), Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, p 455

  • Babiker IS, Mohamed MAA, Hiyama T, Kato K (2005) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. Sci Total Environ 345:127–140. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchment L (2001) Groundwater vulnerability map explanatory notes. NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation. Parramatta, NSW, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita M (1994) Le Carte della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi all’inquinamento. Teoria and practica. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, p 325

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita M, De Maio M (1997) SINTACS. Un sistema parametrico per la valutazione e la cartografia della vulnerabilita` degli acquiferi all’inquinamento. Metodologia and Automatizzazione, vol. 60. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, p 191

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita M, De Maio M (2000) Valutazione e cartografia automatica della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi all’inquinamento con il sistema parametrico SINTACS R5: a new parametric system for the assessment and automatic mapping of ground water vulnerability to contamination. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, p 240

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita M, De Maio M (2004) Assessing and mapping groundwater vulnerability to contamination: the Italian “combined” approach. Geofísica Int 43(4):513–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentati I, Zairi M, Dhia HB (2010) A statistical and geographical information system analysis for groundwater intrinsic vulnerability: a validated case study from Sfax–Agareb, Tunisia. Water Environ J 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2010.00235.x

  • Foster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Van Duijvenbooden W, Van Waegeningh HG (eds) TNO committee on hydrological research. Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants, proceedings and information, vol 38. The Netherlands, The Hague, pp 69–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsley RK, Kohler MA, Paulhus JLH (1988) Hydrology for Engineers. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano P, Fabbri AG (1996) Single-parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In Proceedings of Vienna Conference, IAHS Publ. 235, Wallingford, pp 559–566

  • National Research Council (NRC) (1993) Groundwater vulnerability assessment: predictive relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong’or BTI, Long-cang S (2007) Groundwater overdraft vulnerability and environmental impact assessment in Arusha. Environ Geol 51:1171–1176. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0408-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phetprayoon T, Sarapirome S, Navanugraha C, Wonprasaid S (2009) Surface runoff estimation using grid-based curve number method in the upper Lam Phra Phloeng Watershed, Thailand. In 30th Asian conference on remote sensing, 18–23 October 2009, Beijing, China

  • Rapti-Caputo D, Sdao F, Masi S (2006) Pollution risk assessment based on hydrogeological data and management of solid waste landfills. Environ Geol 85:122–131. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarapirome S, Majandang J (2008) Groundwater vulnerability mapping using a GIS-based DRASTIC model at Lam Takhong Subbasin, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. In: Proceedings of the international symposia on geoscience resources and environments of Asian terranes (GREAT 2008), 4th IGCP 516, and 5th APSEG. Bangkok, pp 559–564

  • Soil Conservation Service (SCS) (1985) National engineering handbook. Section 4-Hydrology. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stempoort D, Ewert L, Wassenaar L (1993) Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can Water Res J 18:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba J, Zaporozec A (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International Contributions to Hydrogeology, vol 16. International Association of Hydrogeologists, Heise Hannover, p 131

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was granted by the Commission on Higher Education granting through Mr. Jiradech Majandang who was funded under the CHE-PHD-THA program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Remote Sensing, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand

    Jiradech Majandang & Sunya Sarapirome

Authors
  1. Jiradech Majandang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sunya Sarapirome
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunya Sarapirome.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Majandang, J., Sarapirome, S. Groundwater vulnerability assessment and sensitivity analysis in Nong Rua, Khon Kaen, Thailand, using a GIS-based SINTACS model. Environ Earth Sci 68, 2025–2039 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1890-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1890-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation