Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increased hydrocarbon recovery and CO2 management, a Croatian example

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhanced oil recovery based on CO2 injection is expected to increase recovery from Croatian oil fields. Large quantities of CO2 are generated during hydrocarbon processing produced from gas and gas condensate fields situated in the north-western part of Croatia. First CO2 injection project will be implemented on the Ivanić Oil Field. Numerical modelling based on Upper Miocene sandstone core samples testing results have shown the decrease of oil viscosity during CO2 injection. Some of the characteristics of the testing samples are porosity 21.5–23.6 %, permeability 14–80 × 10−15 m2 and initial water saturation 28–38.5 %. Water alternating foam (WAF) and water alternating gas (WAG) simulations have provided satisfactory results. The WAF injection process has provided better results, but due to the process sensitivity and costs WAG is recommended for future application. During the pilot project 16 × 106 m3 CO2 and 5 × 104 m3 of water were injected. Additional amounts of hydrocarbons (4,440 m3 of oil and 2.26 × 106 m3 of gas) were produced which confirmed injection of CO2 as a successful tertiary oil recovery mechanism in Upper Miocene sandstone reservoirs in the Croatian part of the Pannonian Basin System.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amonette JE, Barr JL, Dobeck LM, Gullickson K, Walsh SJ (2010) Spatiotemporal changes in CO2 emissions during the second ZERT injection, August–September 2008. Environ Earth Sci 60(2):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer S, Class H, Ebert M, Götze H, Holzheid A, Kolditz O, Rosenbaum S, Rabbel W, Schäfer D et al (2012) Modelling, parameterization and evaluation of monitoring methods for CO2 storage in deep saline formations: the CO2-MoPa project. Environ Earth Sci (special issue). doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1707-y

  • Bennaceur K, Monea M, Sakurai S, Gupta N, Ramakrishnan TS, Whittaker S, Randen T (2004) CO2 capture and storage—a solution within. Oilfield Rev 16(3):44–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošnjaković F (1962) Nauka o toplini, prvi dio [Thermodynamics, 1st part—in Croatian], 2nd edn. Tehnička knjiga, Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Jazrawi W, Moberg R, Wilson M (2004) Role of enhanced oil recovery in carbon sequestration: the Weyburn monitoring project, a case study. http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/01/carbon_seq/2a1.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2012

  • Chadwick RA, Zweigel P, Gregersen U, Kirby GA, Holloway S, Johannessen PN (2002) Geological characterisation of CO2 storage sites: lessons from Sleipner, Northern North Sea. Paper B1-3, 6th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, pp 1–4 October 2002, Kyoto

  • Ennis-King J, Paterson L (2003) Role of convective mixing n the long-term storage of carbon dioxide in deep saline formations. SPE paper 84344, SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, pp 5–8 October 2003, Denver

  • Goričnik B, Domitrović D (2003) Laboratorijska istraživanja primjenjivosti CO2 procesa na naftnim poljima u Hrvatskoj [Laboratory Research of CO2 EOR Potential in the Mature Oilfields in the Republic of Croatia]. Naftaplin 1:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gozalpour F, Ren SR, Tohidi B (2005) CO2 EOR and storage in oil reservoirs. Oil and gas science and technology. Rev IFP 60(3):537–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrnčević L (2008) Analiza utjecaja provedbe Kyoto protokola na naftnu industriju i poslovanje naftne tvrtke [Impact Analysis on the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol in the oil industry—in Croatian]. Dissertation, University of Zagreb

  • Kühn M, Förster A, Grossmann J, Meyer R, Pilz P, Reinicke K, Schaefer D, Tesmer M, Wendel H (2011) CLEAN—Large-scale CO2 storage for enhanced gas recovery in a depleted German gasfield. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2011, abstract #GC51A-0913

  • Lu J, Partin JW, Hovorka SD, Wong C (2010) Potential risk to freshwater resources as a result of leakage from CO2 geological storage: a batch-reaction experiment. Environ Earth Sci 60(2):335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Wilkinson M, Haszeldine RS (2011) Carbonate cements in Miller field of the UK North Sea: a natural analog for mineral trapping in CO2 geological storage. Environ Earth Sci 62(3):507–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malvić T (2008) Production of porosity map by Kriging in sandstone reservoirs, case study from the Sava Depression. Kartografija i Geoinformacije 9:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Malvić T, Velić J (2010) Relations between effective thickness, gas production and porosity in heterogeneous reservoir: an example from the Molve Field, Croatian Pannonian Basin. Pet Geosci 16(1):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malvić T, Velić J (2011) Neogene tectonics in Croatian part of the Pannonian Basin and reflectance in hydrocarbon accumulations. In: Schattner U (ed) New frontiers in tectonic research: at the midst of plate convergence. Rijeka, Intech, pp 215–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Malvić T, Velić J, Peh Z (2005) Qualitative-quantitative analyses of the influence of depth and lithological composition on Lower Pontian sandstone porosity in the central part of Bjelovar Sag (Croatia). Geol Croat 58(1):73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens S, Kempka T, Liebscher A, Lüth S, Möller F, Myrttinen A, Norden B, Schmidt-Hattenberger C, Zimmer M, Kühn M, The Ketzin Group (2012) Europe’s longest-operating on-shore CO2 storage site at Ketzin, Germany: a progress report after three years of injection. Environ Earth Sci (special issue). doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1672-5

  • Novak Zelenika K, Malvić T (2011) Stochastic simulations of dependent geological variables in sandstone reservoirs of Neogene age: a case study of Kloštar field, Sava Depression. Geol Croat 64(2):173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak Zelenika K, Malvić T, Geiger J (2010) Kartiranje gornjomiocenskih pješčenjačkih facijesa metodom indikatorskog kriginga (Mapping of the Late Miocene sandstone facies using indicator kriging). Nafta 61(5):225–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Novosel D (2005) Rezultati projekta pokusnog istiskivanja nafte utiskivanjem ugljičnog dioksida na Naftnom polju Ivanić (The project results of test oil replacement by carbon dioxide on the Ivanić oil field). Naftaplin 1:51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Novosel D (2009) Učinak ugljičnog dioksida u tercijarnoj fazi iskorištavanja naftnih ležišta polja Ivanić [The effect of the carbon dioxide on the tertiary exploration phase at the Ivanić oil field—in Croatian]. Dissertation, University of Zagreb

  • Perić M, Kovač S (2003) Simulacijska studija procesa povećanja iscrpka nafte (EOR-procesa) istiskivanjem ugljik-dioksidom primjenom višekomponentnog modela COMP III [Simulation Study of Enhanced Oil Recovery Process by CO2 injection Applying a Multi-component COMP III]. Naftaplin 1:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Sečen J (2006) Enhance oil recovery methods [Metode povećanja iscrpka nafte—in Croatian], 1st edn. INA-Naftaplin, Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrbanac B, Velić J, Malvić T (2010) Sedimentation of deep-water turbidites in main and marginal basins in the SW part of the Pannonian Basin. Geol Carpath 61(1):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrbošić A, Škrlec M, Novosel D, Ivanović K (2003) Naftno polje Ivanić 1963–2003. (The Ivanić Oil Field 1963–2003). Naftaplin 1:1–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karolina Novak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novak, K., Malvić, T. & Simon, K. Increased hydrocarbon recovery and CO2 management, a Croatian example. Environ Earth Sci 68, 1187–1197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1819-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1819-4

Keywords

Navigation