Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flooding is one of the most destructive natural hazards that cause damage to both life and property every year, and therefore the development of flood model to determine inundation area in watersheds is important for decision makers. In recent years, data mining approaches such as artificial neural network (ANN) techniques are being increasingly used for flood modeling. Previously, this ANN method was frequently used for hydrological and flood modeling by taking rainfall as input and runoff data as output, usually without taking into consideration of other flood causative factors. The specific objective of this study is to develop a flood model using various flood causative factors using ANN techniques and geographic information system (GIS) to modeling and simulate flood-prone areas in the southern part of Peninsular Malaysia. The ANN model for this study was developed in MATLAB using seven flood causative factors. Relevant thematic layers (including rainfall, slope, elevation, flow accumulation, soil, land use, and geology) are generated using GIS, remote sensing data, and field surveys. In the context of objective weight assignments, the ANN is used to directly produce water levels and then the flood map is constructed in GIS. To measure the performance of the model, four criteria performances, including a coefficient of determination (R 2), the sum squared error, the mean square error, and the root mean square error are used. The verification results showed satisfactory agreement between the predicted and the real hydrological records. The results of this study could be used to help local and national government plan for the future and develop appropriate (to the local environmental conditions) new infrastructure to protect the lives and property of the people of Johor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham A (2005) Artificial Neural Networks. In: Peter H. Sydenham, Richard Thorn (ed) Handbook of measuring system design. John Wiley and Sons, London, pp 901–908

  • Arora MK, Das Gupta AS, Gupta RP (2004) An artificial neural network approach for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 25(3):559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE Task Committee (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology I: preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Tatnall ARL (1997) Neural networks in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 18:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahremand A, De Smedt F (2008) Distributed hydrological modeling and sensitivity analysis in Torysa Watershed, Slovakia. Water Resour Manag 22:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (1994) Neural networks and their application. Rev Sci Instrum 65(6):1803–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Blazkova S, Beven K (1997) Flood frequency prediction for data limited catchments in the Czech Republic using a stochastic rainfall model and TOPMODEL. J Hydrol 195(1–4):256–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunderlik JM, Burn DH (2002) Analysis of the linkage between rain and flood regime and its application to regional flood frequency estimation. J Hydrol 261(1–4):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon B (2005) Applicability of neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting ground-water vulnerability: a GIS-based sensitivity analysis. J Hydrol 309:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farajzadeh M (2001) The flood modeling using multiple regression analysis in Zohre & Khyrabad Basins. In: 5th International Conference of Geomorphology, August, Tokyo, Japan

  • Farajzadeh M (2002) Flood susceptibility zonation of drainage basins using remote sensing and GIS, case study area: Gaveh rod Iran. In: Proceeding of international symposium on geographic information systems, Istanbul, Turkey, 23–26 Sept 2002

  • Feng LH, Lu J (2010) The practical research on flood forecasting based on artificial neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 37:2974–2977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez DS, Lutz MA (2010) Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucuman Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol 111:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood I, Kartam N (1994) Neural networks in civil engineering. I: principles and understanding. J Comput Civil Eng 8(2):131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin. Venezuela. Eng Geol 78(1–2):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan AJ, Ghani AA (2006) Development of flood risk map using gis for sg. Selangor Basin. http://redac.eng.usm.my/html/publish/2006_11.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2008

  • Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess LL, Melack JM, Simonett DS (1990) Radar detection of flooding beneath the forest canopy: a review. Int J Remote Sens 11:1313–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess LL, Melack J, Filoso S, Wang Y (1995) Delineation of inundated area and vegetation along the Amazon floodplain with the SIR-C Synthetic Aperture Radar. IEEE T Geosci Remote 33:896–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holger RM, Dandy GC (1996) The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters. Water Resour Res 32:1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MM, Sado K (2001) Flood damage and modeling using satellite remote sensing data with GIS: case study of Bangladesh. In: Jerry Ritchie et al (eds) Remote sensing and hydrology 2000. IAHS Publication, Oxford, pp 455–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MM, Sado K (2002) Development priority map for flood countermeasures by remote sensing data with geographic information system. J Hydrol Eng 9:346–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingma NC (2002) Flood hazard assessment and zonation, Lecture Note. ITC, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu J, Won J, Park H (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lek S, Guégan JF (1999) Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction. Ecol Model 120:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lek S, Delacoste M, Baran P, Dimopoulos I, Lauga J, Aulanier S (1996) Application of neural networks to modelling non-linear relationships in ecology. Ecol Model 90:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin HS, McInnes KJ, Wilding LP, Hallmark CT (1999) Effects of soil morphology on hydraulic properties: I. Quantification of soil morphology. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:948–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Chandrashekar V (2000) Classification of hydrometers based on polarimetric radar measurements: development of fuzzy logic and neuro-fuzzy systems and in situ verifications. J Atmos Ocean Tech 17:140–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YB, Gebremeskel S, De Smedt F, Hoffmann L, Pfister L (2003) A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modelling. J Hydrol 283:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorrai M, Sechi GM (1995) Neural nets for modeling rainfall-runoff transformations. Int Ser Prog Water Res 9:299–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment DR (2002) Arc Hydro: GIS for water resources. ESRI Press, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (1996) The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters. Water Resour Res 32(4):1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas JF (2004) Mapping land use/cover in a tropical coastal area using satellite sensor data, GIS and artificial neural networks. Estuar Coast Shelf S 59:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh JJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 37(9):1264–1276. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Paola JD, Schowengerdt RA (1995) A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely sensed multi-spectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 16:3033–3058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Beven KJ, Ratto M, Matgen P (2008) Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models. Adv Water Resour 31:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirasteh S, Rizvi SMA, Ayazi MH, Mahmoodzadeh A (2010) Using microwave remote sensing for flood study in Bhuj Taluk, Kuchch District Gujarat, India. Int Geoinform Res Dev J 1(1):13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2009) Groundwater potential zonation for basaltic watersheds using satellite remote sensing data and GIS techniques. Central Eur J Geosci 1(1):120–129. doi:10.2478/v10085-009-0008-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010a) Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J Spatial Hydrol 9(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010b) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38(2):301–320. doi:10.1007/s12524-010-0020-z

  • Pradhan B (2010c) Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis. Int J Comput Int Sys 3(3):370–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2011a) Manifestation of an advanced fuzzy logic model coupled with geoinformation techniques for landslide susceptibility analysis. Environ Ecol Stat 18(3):471–493. doi:10.1007/s10651-010-0147-7

  • Pradhan B (2011b) Use of GIS based fuzzy relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 63(2):329–349. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0705-1

  • Pradhan B, Buchroithner MF (2010) Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Eng Geosci 16(2):107–126. doi:10.2113/gseegeosci.16.2.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2009) Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites. Int J Phys Sci 3(11):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010a) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modeling. Environ Modell Softw 25:747–759. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010b) Delineation of landslide hazard areas using frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural network model at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 60:1037–1054. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0245-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010c) Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using backpropagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides 7(1):13–30. doi:10.1007/s10346-009-0183-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Pirasteh S (2010) Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Disaster Adv 3(2):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Shafie M (2009) Flood hazard assessment for cloud prone rainy areas in a typical tropical environment. Disaster Adv 2(2):7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM (2010) Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide hazard analysis using spatial-based statistical models. Arab J Geosci 3(3):319–326. doi:10.1007/s12517-009-0089-2

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM (2011) A 100-year maximum flood susceptibility mapping using integrated hydrological and hydrodynamic models: Kelantan River Corridor, Malaysia. J Flood Risk Manag 4:189–202. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01103.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Singh RP, Buchroithner MF (2006) Estimation of stress and its use in evaluation of landslide prone regions using remote sensing data. Adv Space Res 37:698–709. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010a) A GIS-based backpropagation neural network model and its cross application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Comput Environ Urban Sys 34:216–235. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner M (2010b) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis and its cross-validation in three test areas using a frequency ratio model. Photogramm Fernerkun 1:17–32. doi:10.1127/1432-8364/2010/0037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM, Varathrajoo R (2010c) Approaches for delineating landslide hazard areas using different training sites in an advanced artificial neural network model. Geospatial Inf Sci 13(2):93–102. doi:10.1007/s11806-010-0236-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010d) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide prone area (Cameron Highland, Malaysia). IEEE T Geosci Remote 48(12):4164–4177. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2050328

    Google Scholar 

  • Principe JC, Euliano NR, Lefebvre WC (1999) Neural and adaptive systems: fundamentals through simulations. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid A, Aziz A, Wong KFV (1992) A neural network approach to the determination of aquifer parameters. Ground Water 30:164–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray C, Klindworth KK (2000) Neural networks for agrichemical vulnerability assessment of rural private wells. J Hydrol Eng 4:162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SJ, Chen HC, Kopaska-Merkel DC, Fang JH (1995) Predicting permeability from porosity using artificial neural networks. AAPG Bull 79:1786–1797

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarle WS (1994) Neural networks and statistical models. In: Proceedings of the nineteenth annual SAS users group international conference, SAS Institute, pp 1538–1550

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, VanGenuchten MT (1998) Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See L, Openshaw S (2000) A hybrid multi-model approach to river level forecasting. Hydrol Sci J 45:523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer E, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2011) Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia. Expert Syst Appl 38(7):8208–8219. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.167

  • Sieber A, Uhlenbrook S (2005) Sensitivity analyses of a distributed catchment model to verify the model structure. J Hydrol 310:216–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K, Ward R (1998) Floods: physical processes and human impacts. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, pp 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamari S, Wosten JHM, Ruiz-Suarez JC (1996) Testing an artificial neural network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1088–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura SI, Tateishi M (1997) Capabilities of a four-layered feed-forward neural network: Four layers versus three. IEEE T Neural Netw 8(2):251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Program (2002) Early warning, forecasting and operational flood risk monitoring in Asia (Bangladesh, China and India). http://www.unep.org/geo/geo3.asp. Accessed 21 Aug 2010

  • Varoonchotikul P (2003) Flood forecasting using artificial neural networks. Taylor & Francis, The Netherlands, p 102

  • World Meteorological Organisation (2008) Urban flood management: a tool for integrated flood management. http://www.wmo.int/pages/mediacentre/press_releases/pr_835_en.html. Accessed 15 July 2010

  • Woldt W, Dahab I, Bogardi C, Dou C (1996) Management of diffuse pollution in groundwater under imprecise conditions using fuzzy models. Water Sci Technol 33:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Hassan AM (2011) Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environ Earth Sci 62(3):611–623. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0551-1

  • Zhu XY, SHi Xu, Zhu J-J, Zhou N-Q, Wu C-Y (1997) Study on the contamination of fracture karst water in Boshan District, China. Ground Water 35:538–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is greatly benefited from very helpful reviews by two anonymous reviewers and editorial comments by James W. LaMoreaux.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biswajeet Pradhan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 158 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kia, M.B., Pirasteh, S., Pradhan, B. et al. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 67, 251–264 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z

Keywords

Navigation