Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strengthening foundations of seismically weak buildings on sandy soils in Denizli, Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Marmara earthquake in 1999 was a turning point for Turkey in terms of the emphasis to construct earthquake resistant buildings and to control the performance of existing buildings. To this end, a large number of seismically weak buildings have been inspected. Inherently, a majority of them required some remediation in their foundations. Grouting studies around the foundations of five stories, reinforced concrete buildings with brick walls and strip foundations on three different sites have been conducted. The buildings are built on SC (silty sands) and SM (clayey sands) soils with high ground water level. A grout with a 1:3 cement–water ratio was injected near the columns, and the grouting holes were as much as 7 m deep around the basement level. The injection density was about 10–12 m2/borehole. The soils had low standard penetration test (SPT) (number of blows N) values before grouting. After grouting, the 54.7 mm (NX size) core samples that were obtained from verification boreholes demonstrated that their uniaxial compressive strength and Young’s modulus were remarkably advanced, reaching up to 35.4 and 51.2 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, grouting caused a slight increase in the unit weight of the soils in the examined cases. Similarly, a remarkable relationship was not observed between the operational factors, like grouting pressure and the physico-mechanical properties of grouted soil. Thin sections of the core samples were visualised under polarized light from crossed nicol prisms, which illustrated that small voids that are about 10–30 μm in diameter were homogeneously distributed; additionally, individual voids may reach up to 300 μm in size. This also demonstrated that soil has been replaced by cement and that the amount of voids is highly noticeable, which may explain why the unit weight was not considerably increased. In these cases, a relationship between soil densification and an improvement of compressive strength and Young’s modulus was thus not observed. The study showed that grouting caused soil replacement rather than soil densification in the examined cases. It has dramatically increased the bearing capacity of the tested soils. This practice can be employed to form tough soils when foundations of existing buildings need strengthening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASCE (Committee on Grouting of the Geotechnical Engineering Division) (1980) Preliminary glossary of terms relating to grouting. J Geotech Engg Div ASCE, 106, No. GT7, Proc. Paper 15581

  • Bowles JE (1997) Foundation analysis and design. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Byle MJ, Borden RH (1995) Verification of geotechnical grouting. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York

  • CEN (2003) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Ref. No. prEN 1998-1:2003 E, Brussels

  • D’Ayala D, Charleson AW (2002) Review of seismic strengthening guidelines for R. C. buildings in developing countries. 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, London, September 2002. Paper Ref. 820

  • Dogangun A (2004) Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingol earthquake in Turkey. Eng Struct 26/6:841–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Kelesh AM, Mossaad ME, Basha IM (2001) Model of compaction grouting. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 127(11):955–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (1997) NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Pub. No: 273, Washington, DC

  • Gallagher PM (2000) Passive site remediation for mitigation of liquefaction risk. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute

  • Ilki A, Karadogan F, Pala S, Yuksel E (eds) (2009) Seismic risk assessment and retrofitting. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Inel M, Ozmen HB, Bilgin H (2007) Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Turkey. Eng Struct 30(2):412–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan H, Yilmaz S, Tama YS, Akyol E, Ozmen HB (2006) Seismic strengthening of state buildings: government office of Datca. Turkey First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, (a joint event of the 13th ECEE and 30th General Assembly of the ESC), Geneva, 3–8 September 2006

  • Kaplan H, Yilmaz S, Akyol E, Sen G (2008) A new rapid seismic vulnerability assessment method for Turkey. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, 12–17 October, 2008

  • KOERI (2010) www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/Depremler/onemliler/ege.jpg

  • Rai DC (2005) IITK-GSDMA guidelines on seismic evaluation and strengthening of existing buildings: provisions with commentary and explanatory examples. IIT Kanpur and Gujarat State Disaster Mitigation Authority, Gandhinagar

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubright R, Bandimere S (2004) Ground improvement. In: Moseley MP, Kirsch K (ed) Spon Press, London, pp 440

  • Sanglerat G (1972) The penetrometer and soil exploration. Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun S (1990) Geology and coal resources between Denizli and Usak, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration. Report No: 9985, Ankara, Turkey

  • Tuncdemir F (2007) Theoretical and practical aspects of compaction grouting. Digest 18:1129–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP/UNIDO (1985) Post-earthquake damage evaluation and strength assessment of buildings under seismic conditions, vol 4. UNDP, Vienna

  • Warner J (2004) Practical handbook of grouting; soil, rock and structures. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasti ST, Ozcebe G (eds) (2003) Seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings (NATO science series: IV: Earth and environmental sciences). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Pamukkale University and the Denizli Governorship for their financial support and Zetem Co., Ankara for the injection work and extracting the core samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdal Akyol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akyol, E. Strengthening foundations of seismically weak buildings on sandy soils in Denizli, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 66, 1415–1421 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1352-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1352-x

Keywords

Navigation