Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 65, Issue 7, pp 2139–2146 | Cite as

Transient release of Ni, Mn and Fe from mixed metal sulphides under oxidising and reducing conditions

  • C. Naylor
  • W. Davison
  • M. Motelica-Heino
  • L. M. van der Heijdt
  • G. A. van den Berg
Original Article


The potential release of metals from anoxic sediments exposed to oxygen was investigated by using a synthetic preparation of metal sulphides dominated by solid phase FeS. The technique of DGT (diffusive gradients in thin-films) was used to measure sulphide and Fe, Mn and Ni in the anoxic metal-sulphide slurry, which had a pH of 6.4. Speciation calculations based on these data showed there was moderate supersaturation with respect to amorphous FeS in the solution phase. Measurements made using DGT with a range of diffusion layer thicknesses showed that when Fe, Mn and Ni are removed from solution there is fairly rapid (minutes) release from the solid phase, that is reasonably well sustained. This presumed desorptive release will be responsible for elevated concentrations of some metals in solution when sediments are resuspended. Oxidation of the slurry by bubbling with air rapidly (hours) removed Fe, Mn and Ni from the pore water solution. While Fe concentrations in solution remained low after the removal, Mn and Ni were transiently released. These results were consistent with initial rapid oxidation of Fe(II) to oxyhydroxides, which remove Mn(II) and Ni by adsorption. The slower oxidation of FeS then releases Mn and Ni, but these too are eventually removed by adsorption to iron oxyhydroxides. These data suggest that oxidation of metal sulphides will contribute to the release of metals from sediment disturbed by dredging or remedial aeration, but it is likely to be short lived, with complete removal within a day.


Sediment Trace metals Sulphide Oxidation Mobilisation 


  1. Allen HE, Fu G, Deng B (1993) Analysis of acid-volatile sulfide (AVS) and simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) for the estimation of potential toxicity in aquatic sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:441–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ankley GT (1996) Evaluation of metal/acid-volatile sulfide relationships in the prediction of metal bioaccumulation by benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:2138–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ankley G, Phipps G, Leonard E, Benoit P, Mattson V, Kosian P, Cotter A, Dierkes J, Hansen D, Mahony J (1991) Acid-volatile sulfide as a factor mediating cadmium and nickel bioavailability in contaminated sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:1299–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caetano M, Madureira MJ, Vale C (2003) Metal remobilisation during resuspension of Anoxic contaminated sediment: short-term laboratory study. Water Air Soil Res 143:23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caille N, Tiffreau C, Leyval C, Morel J (2003) Solubility of metals in an anoxic sediment during prolonged aeration. Sci Tot Environ 301:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davison W (1991) The solubility of iron sulphides in synthetic and natural waters at ambient temperature. Aquat Sci 53(4):309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davison W (1993) Iron and manganese in lakes. Earth Sci Rev 34:119–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davison W, Seed C (1983) The kinetics of the oxidation of ferrous iron in synthetic and natural waters. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davison W, Woof C (1984) A study of the cycling of manganese and other elements in a seasonally anoxic lake, Rostherne Mere, UK. Water Res 18:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davison W, Grime G, Woof C (1992) Characterisation of lacustrine iron sulphide particles with proton-induced x-ray emission. Limnol Oceanogr 37:1770–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dzomback DA, Morel FMM (1990) Surface complexation modeling: hydrous ferric oxide. Wiley Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Förstner U, Salomons W (1991) Mobilization of metals from sediments. In: Merian E (ed) Metals and their compounds in the environment. Occurrence, analysis and biological relevance. Weinheim/VCH, New York, pp 379–398Google Scholar
  13. Frevert T (1987) Heavy metals in Lake Kinneret (Israel) II. Hydrogen sulphide dependance of copper, cadmium, lead and zinc. Arch Hydrobiol 109:1–24Google Scholar
  14. Garmo ØA, Davison W, Zhang H (2008) Effects of binding of metals to the hydrogel and filter membrane on the accuracy of the diffusive gradients in thin films technique. Anal Chem 80:9220–9225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton-Taylor J, Davison W, Morfett K (1996) A laboratory study of the biogeochemical cycling of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu across the sediment-water interface of a productive lake. Aquat Sci 58:191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harper M, Davison W, Zhang H, Tych W (1998) Solid phase to solution kinetics in sediments and soils interpreted from DGT measured fluxes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62:2757–2770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huerta-Diaz MA, Carignan R, Tessier A (1993) Measurement of trace metals associated with acid volatile sulfides and pyrite in organic freshwater sediments. Environ Sci Technol 27:2367–2372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huerta-Diaz MA, Tessier A, Carignan R (1998) Geochemistry of trace metals associated with reduced sulfur in freshwater sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 13:213–233Google Scholar
  19. Laxen DPH, Davison W, Woof C (1984) Manganese chemistry in rivers and streams. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:2107–2111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee G, Bigham J, Faure G (2002) Removal of trace metals by coprecipitation with Fe, Al and Mn from natural waters contaminated with acid mine drainage in the Ducktown Mining District, Tennessee. Appl Geochem 17:569–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miao S, DeLaune RD, Jugsujinda A (2006) Influence of sediment redox conditions on release/solubility of metals and nutrients in a Louisiana Mississippi River deltaic plain freshwater lake. Sci Tot Environ 371:334–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morse JW, Arakaki T (1993) Adsorption and coprecipitation of divalent metals with Mackinawite (FeS). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:3635–3640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naylor C, Davison W, Motelica-Heino MGA, van den Berg GA, van der Heijdt LM (2004) Simultaneous release of sulfide with Fe, Mn, Ni and Zn in marine harbour sediment measured using a combined metal/sulfide DGT probe. Sci Tot Environ 328:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Naylor C, Davison W, Motelica-Heino MGA, van den Berg GA, van der Heijdt LM (2006) Potential kinetic availability of metals in sulphidic freshwater sediments. Sci Tot Environ 357:208–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pankow JF, Morgan JJ (1980) Dissolution of tetragonal ferrous sulphide (mackinawite) in anoxic aqueous systems. 2. Implications for the cycling of iron, sulphur and trace metals. Environ Sci Technol 14:183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saulnier I, Mucci A (2000) Trace metal remobilization following the resuspension of estuarine sediments: Saguenay Fjord, Canada. Appl Geochem 15:203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shipley HJ, Gao Y, Kan AT, Tomson MB (2005) Mobilization of metals and inorganic compounds during resuspension of anoxic sediment. ACS National Meeting 45:630–638Google Scholar
  28. Simpson SL, Apte SC, Batley GE (1998) Effect of short-term resuspension events on trace metal speciation in polluted anoxic sediments. Environ Sci Technol 32:620–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stumm W, Morgan J (1996) Aquatic Chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Teasdale P, Hayward S, Davison W (1999) In situ, high resolution measurement of dissolved sulfide using diffusive gradients in thin films with computer imaging densitometry. Anal Chem 71:2186–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tipping E (2002) Cation binding by humic substances. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van den Berg GA, Meijers GGA, van der Heijdt LM, Zwolsman JJG (2001) Dredging-related mobilization of trace metals: a case study in the Netherlands. Water Res 35:1979–1986Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Naylor
    • 1
  • W. Davison
    • 1
  • M. Motelica-Heino
    • 2
  • L. M. van der Heijdt
    • 3
  • G. A. van den Berg
    • 4
  1. 1.Lancaster Environment CentreLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.ISTO, UMR 6113, CNRS Université d’OrléansOrléansFrance
  3. 3.Transport and Water Management InspectorateLelystadThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Kiwa Water ResearchNieuwegeinThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations