Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the changes in magnetic and chemical properties of soil during plant growth in a controlled environment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in magnetic and chemical properties of soil during the growth of tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) are examined in this study. The synthetic soils, prepared from sand, topsoil and organic material, were treated with magnetite powder (<5 μm) in order to simulate metal contamination. Six soil treatments were prepared from two soil types: controls, low-contamination and high-contamination treatments (0.01 and 0.05 g of magnetite powder/kg soil, respectively). Overall, the contaminated soils had a greater decrease in magnetic susceptibility (MS) than the controls, and the difference in MS decrease between the treatments was found to be statistically significant for both soil types. Potential reasons for the overall MS decrease were explored, and among them, trace element uptake by plants probably had a minor contribution as the concentration differences of Fe and other trace elements (Ni, Mn) between treatments were not statistically significant. In soils, oxidized and weakly magnetic minerals (maghemite, goethite and hematite) were common after plant growth, when compared with the untreated (background) soil. Such mineral transformations could have contributed to the overall MS decrease. The results show that exposure to Fe contaminants can affect plant growth and suggest that plant growth can measurably change the magnetic properties of their growth media. While the potential variables affecting plant growth were controlled as much as possible, there still remains the potential that biotic and abiotic chemical reactions could have affected the results. Thus, continuous monitoring of the changes in soil magnetic and chemical properties in more complex soil–plant systems is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Seedling plants established, about 4 weeks of growth; vegetative until first flower opens, about 8 weeks of growth; reproductive until first fruiting occurs, about 10 weeks of growth; harvestable plant terminated after fully grown, about 12 weeks of growth.

References

  • Angers DA, Caron J (1998) Plant induced changes in soil structure: processes and feedbacks. Biogeochemistry 42:55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell JNB, Treshow M (2002) Air pollution and plant life, 2nd edn. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brake SS, Jensen RR, Mattox JM (2004) Effects of coal fly ash amended soils on trace element uptake in plants. Env Geol 45(5):680–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JC (1978) Mechanism of iron uptake by plants. Plant Cell Environ 1(4):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JC, Von Jolley D (1989) Plant metabolic responses to iron-deficiency stress. BioSciences 39(8):546–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth SM, Lees JA (2001) The application of some mineral magnetic measurements and heavy metal analysis for characterising fine sediments in an urban catchment, Coventry, UK. J Appl Geophys 48:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly EL, Guerinot ML (2002) Iron stress in plants. Genome Biol 3(8):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran PJ, Dunan JL, Gholz HL (1990) Exploring the relationship between reflectance red edge and chlorophyll content in slash pine. Tree Physiol 7:33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Day R, Fuller M, Schmidt VA (1977) Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: grain-size and compositional dependence. Phys Earth Planet Interior 13:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong H, Fredrickson JK, Kennedy DW, Zachara JM, Kukkadapu RK, Onstott TC (2000) Mineral transformation associated with the microbial reduction of magnetite. Chem Geol 169:299–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbs SD, Kochian LV (1998) Phytoextraction of Zinc by Oat (Avena sativa), Barley (Hordeum vulgare), and Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea). Environ Sci Technol 32:802–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson D (2000) Microbial oxidation of Fe(II) and Mn(II) at circumneutral pH. In: Lovely DR (ed) Environmental Microbe-Metal Interactions. ASM Press, Washington, pp 31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautam P, Blaha U, Appel E (2005) Magnetic susceptibility of dust-loaded leaves as a proxy of traffic-related heavy metal pollution in Kathmandu city, Nepal. Atmos Environ 39:2201–2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddu SR, Appel E, Jordanova D, Wehland F (2004) Magnetic properties of road dust from Visakhapatnam (India)––relationship to industrial pollution and road traffic. Phys Chem Earth 29:985–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimley DA, Arruda NK, Bramstedt MW (2004) Using magnetic susceptibility to facilitate more rapid, reproducible and precise delineation of hydric soils in the midwestern USA. Catena 58:183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanesch M, Scholger R (2002) Mapping of heavy metal loadings in soils by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements. Env Geol 42:857–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LD, Silberman D, Fisher GL (1981) Crystalline components of stack-collected, size-fractionated coal fly ash. Environ Sci Technol 15(9):1057–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hell R, Stephan UW (2003) Iron uptake, trafficking and homeostasis in plants. Planta 216:541–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Housen BA, Musgrave RJ (1996) Rock magnetic signature of gas hydrates in accretionary prism sediments. Earth Planet Sci Lett 139:509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen RR, Brake SS, Mattox JM (2004) Trace element uptake in plants grown on fly ash amended soils. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry 86(4):219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (1984) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press, Inc, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapicka A, Jordanova N, Petrovsky E, Ustjak S (2001) Effect of different soil conditions on magnetic parameters of power-plant fly ashes. J Appl Geophys 48:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappler A, Straub KL (2005) Geomicrobiological cycling of iron. Rev Mineral Geochem 59:85–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs K, Kuzmann E, Fodor F, Vertes A, Kamnev AA (2005) Mossbauer study of iron uptake in cucumber root. Hyperfine Interact 165:289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolak E (2003) Accumulation of Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd by Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Web.) in environments with various degrees of metallic contamination. Polish J Environ Stud 12(6):713–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecoanet H, Leveque F, Segura S (1999) Magnetic susceptibility in environmental applications: comparison of field probes. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 115:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher BA (1998) Magnetic properties of modern soils and Quaternary loessic paleosols: paleoclimatic implications. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 137:25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HV, Evans HJ, Matrone G (1963) Investigations of the role of iron in chlorophyll metabolism II. Effect of iron deficiency on chlorophyll synthesis. Plant Physiol 38:638–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzka J, Maher BA (1999) Magnetic biomonitoring of roadside tree leaves, identification of spatial and temporal variations in vehicle-derived particulates. Atmos Environ 33:4565–4569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monna F, Puertas A, Leveque F, Losno R, Fronteau G, Marin B et al (2008) Geochemical records of limestone facades exposed to urban atmospheric contamination as monitoring tools? Atmos Environ 42:999–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno E, Sagnotti L, Turell JD, Winkler A, Cascella A (2003) Biomonitoring of traffic air pollution in Rome using magnetic properties of tree leaves. Atmos Environ 37:2967–2977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muxworthy AR, Schmidbauer E, Petersen N (2002) Magnetic properties and Mossbauer spectra of urban atmospheric particulate matter: a case study from Munich, Germany. Geophys J Int 150:558–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norusis MJ (2000) SPSS® 10.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Novel PS (1977) Water relations of flowering of Agave Deserti. Botanical Gazette 138(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovsky E, Kapicka A, Zapletal K, Sebestova E, Spanila T, Dekkers MJ et al (1998) Correlation between magnetic parameters and chemical composition of lake sediments from northern Bohemia-Preliminary study. Phys Chem Earth 23(9–10):1123–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsch K, Dippon U, Rijal ML, Appel E, Kappler A (2010) In Situ magnetic susceptibility measurements as a tool to follow geomicrobiological transformation of Fe minerals. Environ Sci Technol 44:3846–3852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roden EE, Zachara JM (1996) Microbial reduction of crystalline iron (III) oxides: influence of oxide surface area and potential for cell growth. Environ Sci Technol 30:1618–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapkota B, Cioppa MT (2009) Effects of atmospheric pollutants on plant growth and on soil magnetic properties: preliminary results from controlled experiments. Eos Trans AGU 90(22), paper no. GP32A-04

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt A, Yarnold R, Hill M, Ashmore M (2005) Magnetic susceptibility as proxy for heavy metal pollution: a site study. J Chem Explor 85:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwertmann U, Murad E (1983) Effect of pH on the formation of goethite and hematite from ferrihydrite. Clays Clay Miner 31(4):277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma AP, Tripathi BD (2008) Magnetic mapping of fly-ash pollution and heavy metals from soil samples around a point source in a dry tropical environment. Environ Monit Assess 138:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden RED, Wheeler BD (1993) Iron toxicity to Fen plant species. J Ecol 81(1):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spassov S, Egli R, Heller F, Nourgaliev DK, Hannam J (2004) Magnetic quantification of urban pollution sources in atmospheric particulate matter. Geophys J Int 159:555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strzyszcz Z, Magiera T (1998) Magnetic susceptibility and heavy metals contamination in soils of southern Poland. Phys Chem Earth 23(9–10):1127–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W, Lee GF (1961) Oxygenation of ferrous iron. Ind Eng Chem 53(2):143–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theis TL, Wirth JL (1977) Sorptive behavior of trace metals on fly ash in aqueous systems. Environ Sci Technol 11(12):1096–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Oldfield F (1986) Environmental magnetism. Allen and Unwin Publications Ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodard TL, Thomas RJ, Xing B (2003) Potential for phytoextraction of cobalt by tomato. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 34(5 and 6):645–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge a Premier’s Research Excellence Award and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council award to Dr. Maria T. Cioppa. They would like to thank Daniel Hanley for assisting the color measurements, Ambika Paudel for assisting in morphological measurements, and Dr. Michael Jackson at the Institute for Rock Magnetism (University of Minnesota) for hysteresis measurements. They are grateful to Dr. Ihsan Al-Aasm and an anonymous reviewer for providing helpful comments that improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Sapkota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sapkota, B., Cioppa, M.T. & Gagnon, J.E. Investigation of the changes in magnetic and chemical properties of soil during plant growth in a controlled environment. Environ Earth Sci 65, 385–399 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1099-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1099-4

Keywords

Navigation