Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 1001–1010 | Cite as

Investigation of mercury levels in soil around a municipal solid waste incinerator in Shenzhen, China

  • Jun-Jian Wang
  • Hong-Wei Zhao
  • Xiu-Ping Zhong
  • Si-Fang Kong
  • Yang-Sheng Liu
  • Hui Zeng
Original Article


Within the management hierarchy of municipal solid waste (MSW), incineration with energy recovery is a desired and viable option often used in densely populated and economically developed cities. The gaseous and particulate mercury (Hg) emitted from MSW incinerators may accumulate in the soil entering via dry and wet deposition. To investigate the soil Hg level and estimate the effects of the local meteorological and topographical characteristics (e.g., winds and terrain) on the soil Hg distribution, two layers of soil samples around an MSW incinerator in Shenzhen, China were collected and analyzed. Results showed that the Hg levels ranged from 0.012 to 0.136 mg kg−1 and from 0.013 to 0.100 mg kg−1 in the surface and subsurface soils, respectively. Long-term exposure of the soil to atmospheric Hg from the MSW incinerator dominates the spatial pattern of soil Hg. The wind frequency directly affected Hg distribution but not decisively. Interestingly, the variations of Hg level with downwind distance away from the stack were highly consistent with the terrain profile (r 2: 0.412–0.748). The effects of winds and terrain on soil Hg distribution and their mechanisms are discussed and general Hg dispersion patterns for transport on terrain are further proposed.


Hg Municipal solid waste Incineration Soil Terrain 



This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 20877002), and the “Shenzhen Double-Hundred Talents” program. Thanks the Shenzhen Environmental Monitoring Centre for assistance in instrument analysis. The authors are also grateful to Ying-Han Li for help on sampling and Prof. Eugene Leong for help on language improving.


  1. Aarne Vesilind P, Jeffrey Peirce J, Weiner RF (1994) Environmental engineering. Butterworth Heinemann, WoburnGoogle Scholar
  2. Amirbahman A, Reid AL, Haines TA, Kahl JS, Arnold C (2002) Association of methylmercury with dissolved humic acids. Environ Sci Technol 36(4):690–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bache CA, Gutenmann WH, Rutzke M, Chu G, Elfving DC, Lisk DJ (1991) Concentrations of metals in grasses in the vicinity of a municipal refuse incinerator. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 20(4):538–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahlmann E, Ebinghaus R, Ruck W (2006) Development and application of a laboratory flux measurement system (LFMS) for the investigation of the kinetics of mercury emissions from soils. J Environ Manage 81(2):114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandon NP, Francis PA, Jeffrey J, Kelsall GH, Yin Q (2001) Thermodynamics and electrochemical behaviour of Hg-S-Cl-H2O systems. J Electroanal Chem 497(1–2):18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunner PH, Monch H (1986) The flux of metals through municipal solid-waste incinerators. Waste Manage Res 4(1):105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpi A (1997) Mercury from combustion sources: a review of the chemical species emitted and their transport in the atmosphere. Water Air Soil Pollut 98(3–4):241–254Google Scholar
  8. Carpi A, Weinstein LH, Ditz DW (1994) Bioaccumulation of mercury by sphagnum moss near a municipal solid-waste incinerator. J Air Waste Manage 44(5):669–672Google Scholar
  9. Cheng JP, Yuan T, Wang WH, Jia JP, Lin XY, Qu LY, Ding ZH (2006) Mercury pollution in two typical areas in Guizhou province, China and its neurotoxic effects in the brains of rats fed with local polluted rice. Environ Geochem Health 28(6):499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clear R, Berman S (1994) Environmental and health-aspects of lighting—mercury. J Illum Eng Soc 23(2):138–152Google Scholar
  11. Deng P (2006) Shenzhen statistical yearbook. China Statistical Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillis AA, Miller DR (2000) Some local environmental effects on mercury emission and absorption at a soil surface. Sci Total Environ 260(1–3):191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gustin MS, Stamenkovic J (2005) Effect of watering and soil moisture on mercury emissions from soils. Biogeochemistry 76(2):215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanna SR, Chang JS, Strimaitis DG (1990) Uncertainties in source emission rate estimates using dispersion models. Atmos Environ 24(12):2971–2980Google Scholar
  15. Hu CW, Chao MR, Wu KY, Chang-Chien GP, Lee WJ, Chang LW, Lee WS (2003) Characterization of multiple airborne particulate metals in the surroundings of a municipal waste incinerator in Taiwan. Atmos Environ 37(20):2845–2852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaleri CJ (2000) Implementation issues: mercury transport & fate combustion risk assessments in region 6. US EPA, Region. Accessed December 2009
  17. Katul GG, Porporato A, Nathan R, Siqueira M, Soons MB, Poggi D, Horn HS, Levin SA (2005) Mechanistic analytical models for long-distance seed dispersal by wind. Am Nat 166(3):368–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kinsey JS, Anscombe FR, Lindberg SE, Southworth GR (2004a) Characterization of the fugitive mercury emissions at a chlor-alkali plant: overall study design. Atmos Environ 38(4):633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinsey JS, Swift J, Bursey J (2004b) Characterization of fugitive mercury emissions from the cell building at a US chlor-alkali plant. Atmos Environ 38(4):623–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu YS, Zhan ZY, Du F, Kong SF, Liu YS (2009) Indoor air concentrations of mercury species in incineration plants for municipal solid waste (MSW) and hospital waste (HW). Chemosphere 75(2):266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Llobet JM, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL (2002) Spatial distribution and temporal variation of metals in the vicinity of a municipal solid waste incinerator after a modernization of the flue gas cleaning systems of the facility. Sci Total Environ 284(1–3):205–214Google Scholar
  22. Loppi S, Putorti E, Pirintsos SA, De Dominicis V (2000) Accumulation of heavy metals in epiphytic lichens near a municipal solid waste incinerator (Central Italy). Environ Monit Assess 61(3):361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin DO (1976) Comment on “The change of concentration standard deviations with distance”. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 26:145–147Google Scholar
  24. Meneses M, Llobet JM, Granero S, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL (1999) Monitoring metals in the vicinity of a municipal waste incinerator: temporal variation in soils and vegetation. Sci Total Environ 226(2–3):157–164Google Scholar
  25. Meroney RN (1992) Dispersion in non-flat obstructed terrain and advanced modeling techniques. Plant Oper Program 11(1):6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muenhor D, Satayavivad J, Limpaseni W, Parkpian P, Delaune RD, Gambrell RP, Jugsujinda A (2009) Mercury contamination and potential impacts from municipal waste incinerator on Samui Island, Thailand. J Environ Sci Heal A 44(4):376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nadal M, Bocio A, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL (2005) Trends in the levels of metals in soils and vegetation samples collected near a hazardous waste incinerator. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49(3):290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Bureau of Statistics of China (1996–2007) China statistical yearbook. China Statistical Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  29. Pasquill F (1974) Atmospheric diffusion. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Pirrone N, Keeler GJ, Nriagu JO (1996) Regional differences in worldwide emissions of mercury to the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 30(17):2981–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Primbs T, Wilson G, Schmedding D, Higginbotham C, Simonich SM (2008) Influence of Asian and Western United States agricultural areas and fires on the atmospheric transport of pesticides in the Western United States. Environ Sci Technol 42(17):6519–6525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reis MF, Sampaio C, Brantes A, Aniceto P, Melim M, Cardoso L, Gabriel C, Simao F, Miguel JP (2007) Human exposure to heavy metals in the vicinity of Portuguese solid waste incinerators—Part 1: biomonitoring of Pb, Cd and Hg in blood of the general population. Int J Hyg Environ Health 210(3–4):439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rimmer DL, Vizard CG, Pless-Mulloli T, Singleton I, Air VS, Keatinge ZAF (2006) Metal contamination of urban soils in the vicinity of a municipal waste incinerator: one source among many. Sci Total Environ 356(1–3):207–216Google Scholar
  34. Schilcher H, Trittler R (1997) Investigations on the evaluation of mercury residues in medicinal plants, plant drugs and plant drug preparations. 4. On hazardous contaminant contents in plant drugs and drug preparations. Pharm Ind 59(1):90–94Google Scholar
  35. Schuhmacher M, Meneses M, Granero S, Llobet JM, Domingo JL (1997) Trace element pollution of soils collected near a municipal solid waste incinerator: human health risk. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 59(6):861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Semu E, Singh BR, Selmerolsen AR (1986) Mercury pollution of effluent, air, and soil near a battery factory in Tanzania. Water Air Soil Poll 27(1–2):141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Semu E, Singh BR, Selmerolsen AR (1987) Adsorption of mercury-compounds by tropical soils. 2. Effect of soil-solution ratio, ionic-strength, pH, and organic-matter. Water Air Soil Poll 32(1–2):1–10Google Scholar
  38. Shaub WM (1993) Mercury emissions from MSW incinerators—an assessment of the current situation in the United-States and forecast of future emissions. Resour Conserv Recyl 9(1–2):31–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sheet E (2004) National listing of fish advisories. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. Accessed December 2009
  40. Slowey AJ, Rytuba JJ, Brown GE (2005) Speciation of mercury and mode of transport from placer gold mine tailings. Environ Sci Technol 39(6):1547–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Southworth GR, Lindberg SE, Zhang H, Anscombe FR (2004) Fugitive mercury emissions from a chlor-alkali factory: sources and fluxes to the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 38(4):597–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Southworth GR, Lindberg SE, Bogle MA, Zhang H, Kuiken T, Price J, Reinhart D, Sfeir H (2005) Airborne emissions of mercury from municipal solid waste. II: potential losses of airborne mercury before landfill. J Air Waste Manage 55(7):870–877Google Scholar
  43. Stein ED, Cohen Y, Winer AM (1996) Environmental distribution and transformation of mercury compounds. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 26(1):1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tao S, Deng B (1993) Content distribution pattern and pollution of mercury in soil from Shenzhen area. China Environ Sci 13(1):35–38 [in Chinese]Google Scholar
  45. United Nations Environment Programme Chemicals (2002) Global mercury assessment. Switzerland. Accessed December 2009
  46. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Mercury Study Report To Congress. EPA-452/R-97-005. Accessed December 2009
  47. Wang DY, Qing CL, Guo TY, Guo YJ (1997) Effects of humic acid on transport and transformation of mercury in soil-plant systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 95(1–4):35–43Google Scholar
  48. Wang DY, Shi XJ, Wei SQ (2003) Accumulation and transformation of atmospheric mercury in soil. Sci Total Environ 304(1–3):209–214Google Scholar
  49. Xin M, Gustin MS (2007) Gaseous elemental mercury exchange with low mercury containing soils: investigation of controlling factors. Appl Geochem 22(7):1451–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xin M, Gustin M, Johnson D (2007) Laboratory investigation of the potential for re-emission of atmospherically derived Hg from soils. Environ Sci Technol 41(14):4946–4951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang XP, Wang LQ (2008) Spatial analysis and hazard assessment of mercury in soil around the coal-fired power plant: a case study from the city of Baoji, China. Environ Geol 53(7):1381–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zemba SG, Green LC, Crouch EAC, Lester RR (1996) Quantitative risk assessment of stack emissions from municipal waste combustors. J Hazard Mater 47(1–3):229–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang H, Lindberg SE (1999) Processes influencing the emission of mercury from soils: a conceptual model. J Geophys Res Atmos 104(D17):21889–21896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang H, Lindberg SE, Marsik FJ, Keeler GJ (2001) Mercury air/surface exchange kinetics of background soils of the Tahquamenon River watershed in the Michigan Upper Peninsula. Water Air Soil Poll 126(1–2):151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Urban Planning and DesignPeking UniversityShenzhenChina
  2. 2.Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Circular EconomyShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations