Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 375–381 | Cite as

Hydrochemical variations of epikarst springs in vertical climate zones: a case study in Jinfo Mountain National Nature Reserve of China

Original Article


High temporal resolution (15 min) measurements of stage, pH, electric conductivity, temperature, and other hydrochemical parameters of groundwater at two sites in the Jinfo Mountain Nature Reserve of China were collected using automatic data loggers. Bitan Spring (BS 700 m a.s.l.) sits in subtropical climate zone, while Shuifang Spring (SS 2,060 m a.s.l.) is located in plateau temperate climate. The data show that hydrochemistry of epikarst springs at different altitudes is very sensitive to the changes of their physical environment, especially two factors: air temperature and soil CO2 concentration. Springs at lower altitude are associated with higher air temperature and soil CO2 concentration, thus more likely leading to more active karst processes than those at higher elevation. Water temperature and pH of BS showed a noticeable diurnal circle with high values in daytime and low values at night. The data also indicate that at least there are two effects that could impact the variations of groundwater hydrochemistry during flood pulse: dilution effect and CO2 effect.


Hydrochemical variations Epikarst springs Vertical climates Jinfo Mountain 


  1. Chan HJ (2001) Effect of land use and urbanization on hydrochemistry and contamination of groundwater from Taejon area, Korea. J Hydrol 253:194–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldscheider N, Drew D (2007) Methods in karst hydrogeology. Taylor & Francis Group, London, p 264Google Scholar
  3. Grasso DA, Jeannin PY, Zwahlen F (2003) A deterministic approach to the coupled analysis of karst springs’ hydrographs and chemographs. J Hydrol 271:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Groves C, Meiman J (2005) Weathering, geomorphic work, and karst landscape evolution in the Cave City groundwater basin, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky. Geomorphology 67:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. He S, Xu S, Zhang M (1997) CO2 concentration, hydrochemical measurement in karst soil and their relationship with karst process. Carsologica Sinica 16(4):319–324Google Scholar
  6. Helena B, Pardo R, Vega M, Barrado E, Fernandez JM, Fernandez L (2000) Temporal evolution of groundwater composition in an alluvial (Pisuerga river, Spain) by principal component analysis. Water Res 34:807–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hess JW, White WB (1988) Storm response of the karstic carbonate aquifer of southcentral Kentucky. J Hydrol 99:235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hess JW, White WB (1993) Groundwater geochemistry of the carbonate karst aquifer, southcentral Kentucky, USA. Appl Geochem 8:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jiang Z (2000) Carbon cycle of epikarst system in southern China and its ecological effect. Quat Res 20(4):316–321Google Scholar
  10. Labat D, Abadiou R, Mangin A (2000) Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs. Part I. Convolution and spectral analyses. J Hydrol 238:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lastennet R, Mudry J (1997) Role of karstification and rainfall in the behavior of a heterogeneous karst system. Environ Geol 32:114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li W, Yu L, Yuan D (2004) Researches on activity of carbonic anhydrase from soil and its bacteria in different Karst ecosystems and its ecological significance. Acta Ecol Sin 24(3):438–443Google Scholar
  13. Liu Z, Groves C, Yuan D (2003) Study on the hydrochemical variations caused by the water–rock–gas interaction: an example from the Guilin Karst Experimental Site. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 30(4):13–18Google Scholar
  14. Liu Z, Groves C, Yuan D, Meiman J (2004) South China aquifer storm-scale hydrochemistry. Ground Water 42(4):491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu Z, Li Q, Sun H (2006) Diurnal variations of hydrochemistry in a travertine-depositing stream at Baishuitai, Yunnan, SW China. Aquat Geochem 12(2):103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Z, Li Q, Sun H, Wang J (2007) Seasonal, diurnal and storm-scale hydrochemical variations of typical epikarst springs in subtropical karst areas of SW China: soil CO2 and dilution effects. J Hydrol 337:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pen G, Sun Y, Teng Y (2000) Carbon distribution in Fengcong karst soil system of humid subtropical zone and its transition. Chin J Appl Ecol 11(1):69–72Google Scholar
  18. Ryan MT, Meiman J (1996) An examination of short-term variations in water quality at a karst spring in Kentucky. Ground Water 34(1):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vesper DJ, White WB (2004) Storm pulse chemographs of saturation index and carbon dioxide pressure: implications for shifting recharge sources during storm events in the karst aquifer at Fort Campbell, Kentucky/Tennessee, USA. Hydrogeol J 12:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu W, Kuang M, Wei B (2003) Preliminary study of CO2 concentration in soil in subtropical karst district of shrub. J Guizhou Norm Univ (Nat Sci) 21(2):70–74Google Scholar
  21. Yuan D (1998) Contribution of IGCP379 “karst processes and carbon cycle” to global change. Episodes 21(3):198Google Scholar
  22. Yuan D, Cai G (1988) Karst environment. Chongqing Publishing House, Chongqing, pp 25–29Google Scholar
  23. Yuan D, Jiang Z (2000) Progresses of IGCP379 “Karst processes and the carbon cycle” in China. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 27(1):49–51Google Scholar
  24. Yuan D, Liu Z (1998) Global karst correlation, Final Report of IGCP 299 “geology, climate, hydrology and karst Formation”. Science Press, Beijing; VSP Publisher, The Netherlands, p 308Google Scholar
  25. Yuan D, Zhang C (2002) Karst processes and the carbon cycle, final report of IGCP 379. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, p 220Google Scholar
  26. Zeng Y, Kuang M, Li L (2002) Differences in karst features at different altitudes in Jinfo mountain in Chongqing. J Guizhou Norm Univ (Nat Sci) 20(4):9–12Google Scholar
  27. Zhang C, Cao J (2003) Seasonal and diurnal variation of physical-chemistry of typical springs under different vegetation—a case study of landiantang spring and dongwang spring at Nongla Village, Mashan County, Guangxi. Carsologica Sinica 22(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang C, Yuan D, Cao J (2005) Analysis on the environmental sensitivities of typical dynamic epikarst system at the Nongla monitoring site, Guangxi, China. Environ Geol 47(5):615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhong Z (1997) Progresses in vegetation ecology. Publishing House of Southwest Normal University, Chongqing, p 452Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheng Zhang
    • 1
  • Jun Yan
    • 2
  • Jianguo Pei
    • 1
  • Yongjun Jiang
    • 3
  1. 1.Karst Dynamics Laboratory, MLRInstitute of Karst Geology, CAGSGuilinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Geography and GeologyWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  3. 3.School of Geographic SciencesSouthwest China UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations