Is use of oil-field brine as a dust-abating agent really benign? Tracing the source and flowpath of contamination by oil brine in a shallow phreatic aquifer

Abstract

In Ohio, 1985 H.R. Bill 501 authorizes the local authorities to issue permits to use oil-field brine surface spreading as a dust and ice control agent. Such permits are usually given without any necessary hydrogeological expertise as to the potential impact on the shallow aquifers, particularly if the brine spreading occurs in a recharge area. One such case occurred recently in the southwestern suburb of the City of Wooster, OH, USA, where a group of home owners were seeking judicial relief when their water wells began yielding salty water as a result of brine spreading on a nearby large open storage area for oil and gas well drilling supplies. The defendant, owner of the storage yard, acted in accordance with the permit issued by the local authorities. Yet, decentralized decision making and an increased emphasis on local and citizen involvement have created a gap between science and society. The local authorities were not required by law to condition the issuance of the permit on an analysis of the potential environmental impact. The decision to issue that permit was made purely on non-scientific grounds. Therefore, the residents had no choice but to embark on a costly process of proving the damages, causation, and liability in court of law. During the protracted, 6-year long conflict, an extensive hydrogeological and hydrochemical data set (including stable isotopes’ analyses along with the complete chemical analyses of major and minor constituents) was amassed at a great cost to both sides. The following article presents the hydrogeological and hydrochemical interpretation of this data set. In addition, the case illustrates a glaring deficiency in the Ohio, 1985 H.R. Bill 501, and one pitfall in the “politically correct” philosophy of delegating decision-making process entirely to the non-professional local authorities.